If Apple made a high quality note like product, I would be all over it!
I still don't get why you're arguing that Apple will always treat the iPad Mini as a second-tier product. Isn't it more probable that the Mini got crappy specs because a) development likely started a while ago, when iPad 2 was the flagship and b) it was developed in secret by a separate team so that the full-size iPad was on a different schedule and got all the goodies while the Mini was essentially a previous-generation device when it was released? A similar thing happened with the very first iPad, which was basically an iPhone 3GS and which even had its own special iOS version - the teams working on the iPad and the iPhone 4 likely didn't know anything about each other.
Now that the Mini has come into its own as a product I think Apple will give it some love, i. e. at the very least current-gen SOCs and ideally a retina display. Again, it doesn't make sense to artificially cripple a product which is already successful, but probably has even more potential. I'm not sure consumers don't care about these things, neither I nor anyone I know (non-techies for the most part) are interested in the Mini until it gets a retina display, for example. That's not some kind or arcane spec only nerds care about, even my dad can immediately perceive the difference between retina and non-retina.
I demonstrated in many ways that I don't think it's an artificial limitation yet you keep trying to put words in my mouth.
I think that there are technical, financial and logistical reasons why the mini can't have the most powerful CPUs and that the full iPad will always allow for more power (because of its size and higher margins).
And I don't think they intend to artificially cripple the mini. And I didn't say that consumers did not care about screen resolution, I was specifically talking about CPU speed/generation.
Anyway, end of discussion, since you obviously did not read my replies thoroughly and avoided addressing the core of the issue (the full iPad is bigger and more expensive so it can be more powerful).
If the next Mini retains crappy specs, I'm going to quote this post again and admit that I was wrong and Casiotone rules. If not, well...
I can't tell if you're being serious or not? Their stock was at its highest under Steve Jobs, and is now at its lowest under Tim Cook. I'm not saying Cook is an all around bad leader, because Steve obviously saw something in him. However what Apple was doing previously was a winning formula. Sure Cook wants to put his mark on Apple but not everything needs to be changed. Maybe I'm just throwing a shot in the dark. But it seems like to me, in order to have a balanced year Apple was better off releasing several products throughout the year, instead of releasing several products all at once. To me it seems like Cook is really just taking a gamble.
If Apple made a high quality note like product, I would be all over it!