Sure there is. However, this involves unplugging and placing the hardware in a vault sealed away from people. Nice thing is that it doesn't matter what OS you are using.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
600,000 Macs Worldwide Reportedly Infected by Flashback Trojan
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Sure there is. However, this involves unplugging and placing the hardware in a vault sealed away from people. Nice thing is that it doesn't matter what OS you are using.
Or you could choose to not be an idiot and Google **** that you don't understand, the word certificate alone should be users to Google wtf their Mac is asking them.
----------
Not yet anyway...
My systems is clean.
BTW, I noticed that no one has mentioned these commands are case specific, so copy and paste is the best way to go. If you don't capitalize what needs to be capitalized you will not get the correct results, as I tried it in all lower case.
BTW, I noticed that no one has mentioned these commands are case specific, so copy and paste is the best way to go. If you don't capitalize what needs to be capitalized you will not get the correct results, as I tried it in all lower case.
That was one of the most helpful posts I've read in a long time here.
Thanks for not being one of the "only dumb people install Trojans so I'm not going to help them" people.
Because hitting the "remove all" button after a scan completes is so difficult in Windows these days.
600,000? Is this a sizable portion of the install base of OSX? I would think this would be just a drop in the bucket for the Windows install base.
Im pretty sure my Mac Pro is clean as I have Office '08 installed. I think it is kind of weird that the presents of this program would interfer with a trojan.
Im pretty sure my Mac Pro is clean as I have Office '08 installed. I think it is kind of weird that the presents of this program would interfer with a trojan.
It exists and it's called " Software Update"
So the fact that I've run Software Update (and always update whenever prompted) and everything is up-to-date means I'm ok? Why all this Terminal shenanigans then?
Also, here is an article about Snow Leopard. I know it's not Lion, but people always thought it's so secure.
http://blogs.computerworld.com/14754/security_pro_snow_leopard_is_less_secure_than_vista_windows_7
Charlie Miller stated that Vista is more secure than Snow Leopard.
OSX is far from "as secure as an OS can be" not only that, but it's not even the most secure OS out there. As a software engineer I can see why hackers don't want to write malware for OSX... why would I risk prosecution to infect 10% of the world? On top of that if a hacker makes a virus for Mac it makes headlines, so there is a lot more attention to it.
Last edited:
That is a reactive approach instead of a proactive one.It exists and it's called " Software Update"
You'll also be shocked at how many people ignore the software update notifications.
It wouldn't be money well spent and it would be the illusion of peace of mind. An anti-virus cannot protect you against future threats, while known threats are patched by Apple via Software Update.
The best strategy against malware for a Mac user is to follow sites like this one to keep informed of any occurrence of malware.
I think that the original question is more of "what if you have an empty directory?"
/Applications/whatever.app (with the program installed or not) is nothing more than a directory name. The OS handles it in a special way when you double-click it. So, is that sufficient or does the malware go deeper and look for the executable which is in a sub-directory?
When I bought my Mac I remember Apple having a series of ads (the "Hello I'm a Mac..." ones) where the 'PC' had a cold and the 'Mac' said he can't get viruses. It was one of the reasons I went for a Mac.
Has that changed or were Apple stretching the truth?
This has to be the most naive comment I've read all day.
The typical non-techie person is not going to waste their time following Apple forums.
I do agree, but then, PEBCAK. There is really no proactive approach against that.
This is just simply untrue. Any decent AV with a good heuristic scanning engine will certainly have a *shot* at detecting 0-day malware. "Software updates" have virtually no chance of doing the same (nor are they supposed to). And your insinuation that an AV can make a system more insecure is just simply dangerous.
Back on topic, I'm not sure this thing is that big a deal. It's an exploit in Java and not OSX itself.
And yet another OS patched it way before Apple, therefore making that OS more secure in this instance.
Software Update is free and it comes with your Mac.
How is installing another piece of software that itself might be compromised being proactive? And if some one is going to ignore software updates what makes you think they'll use AV software properly? Don't AV packages require frequent updates too?
Macs are as safe as ever.
It used to be that when you hooked up a fresh install of windows, connected it to the internet, and waited 20 seconds, you'd already have a few viruses. Since those days, Microsoft has done a good job securing windows, but it's still less secure than a mac.
Macs are safe as long as you read what see on the screen. If you can't, then they're just as unsafe as windows, but it's a USER problem, not an OS problem.
When the day comes (and I don't doubt it will come for a mac, just like for ANY OS), that there is a virus that attacks a mac just connected to the internet, then I will feel that macs are unsafe, but that has never happened yet. Any time new code is created, like Mac transitioning to Lion, the new code might have bugs in it that allows viruses. But nothing has come out yet.
It used to be that when you hooked up a fresh install of windows, connected it to the internet, and waited 20 seconds, you'd already have a few viruses. Since those days, Microsoft has done a good job securing windows, but it's still less secure than a mac.
Macs are safe as long as you read what see on the screen. If you can't, then they're just as unsafe as windows, but it's a USER problem, not an OS problem.
When the day comes (and I don't doubt it will come for a mac, just like for ANY OS), that there is a virus that attacks a mac just connected to the internet, then I will feel that macs are unsafe, but that has never happened yet. Any time new code is created, like Mac transitioning to Lion, the new code might have bugs in it that allows viruses. But nothing has come out yet.
Macs still can't get "viruses". There is actually no known virus for Mac. But Macs can get infected by Trojans, that is malicious code that bad people lure the user into installing on their machine.
You have it backwards. Keeping up to date with software updates is a preemptive or proactive approach.
A reactive approach would be falling behind with software updates, getting the malware, then using a scan and remove program.
Sure it has "a shot" in the dark, but the fact remains that AV software has been used as a vector for attacking Windows. That's not an insinuation, it's the truth.