Canon really screws its users over.
Does it say if the new lens is rectilinear?Hm, interesting. Nice to see a new 300 and 400 prime, and the 8-15 just looks weird and rather specialist - I'll stick with my 15mm fisheye! The issue of prices is an old one, and the street price will always drop after the first round or two of purchasers have gotten theirs.
The 60D is an upgrade for 550D owners rather than 50D owners. If you currently own a 40D or 50D, is the 60D an enticing upgrade? Price-wise, if the quoted price is correct, the 60D doesn't seem like a good deal compared its predecessor. In my opinion, it isn't.How?
The 60D is an upgrade for 550D owners rather than 50D owners. If you currently own a 40D or 50D, is the 60D an enticing upgrade? Price-wise, if the quoted price is correct, the 60D doesn't seem like a good deal compared its predecessor. In my opinion, it isn't.
It has less features than its predecessor for one:
- made of plastic instead of metal
- slower fps (5.3 instead of 6.3) and smaller buffer than the 50D
- uses SD cards (so if you're upgrading from a x0D, you have to sell your compact flash cards
It's a camera driven by marchitecture, more of an upgraded 550D than an upgrade to the 50D. They had to cripple the features in order to be able to sell it alongside the 7D. That's an attitude that bugs me.
Does it say if the new lens is rectilinear?
As for the lenses, I'm disappointed that the people who say there will never be a 24-70mm f/2.8L IS seem to be right. All of those rumors about it, and yet again, it remains a "unicorn."
So they just wanted to make a lens the will work on both ff and crop but will end up being slower than if they had an 8mm and a 15mm both at f/2.8.
Sounds like they're just thinking about their bottom line![]()
I suspect you'd be less bothered if they had just named the camera something else. Obviously anyone who really needs more camera than the 50D can step up to the 7D. The 60D slots in logically in price and features between the 550D and the 7D."
No, I'd still be bothered by it. In my opinion, Canon has one camera too many in its line-up: I'd have gotten rid of the current 550D instead and called the 60D an upgrade to the 550D. I don't see it as a camera that fills a gap in Canon's line-up.I suspect you'd be less bothered if they had just named the camera something else. Obviously anyone who really needs more camera than the 50D can step up to the 7D. The 60D slots in logically in price and features between the 550D and the 7D.
8-15??? Why??? Seems to be a pretty limited market for this thing.
New extenders ... Huh!!?? are they really better or just marketing hype?
70-300 ... Might be interested in this as a travel lens . Looks to be pretty small,though it extends.
I hope Nikon doesn't take a page out of Canon's book
Given the prices they are asking (particularly for the lenses), I would say Canon is taking a page from Nikon's book. Some of it is probably attributable to FOREX, but yikes.
On the other hand, I think Nikon is already taking a (good) page from Canon's book with their new f/4 lenses. That's always been a hole in Nikon's lens offering. I admire Canon and Sony's ability to use their ability to understand consumer markets (think about all the other "stuff" they sell aside from cameras). I think Nikon is starting to catch on.
I do not want to make this into a Canon vs. Nikon debate. Let me say this: I don't think Nikon is screwing as much with their high-end customers (all semi-pro to pro bodies use variants of the same AF system, are fast and not crippled in any obvious way), they're screwing a little more on the low end -- most notably by omitting a focus motor in the low-end models and disabling some metering functions for AI-S lenses (which doesn't affect the majority of people who buy one or two cheap consumer-grade lenses, but people like me).Given the prices they are asking (particularly for the lenses), I would say Canon is taking a page from Nikon's book.
As far as I remember, Nikon has recently released only two f/4 lenses recently and only one of them is `new:' the 16-35 mm and the 24-120 mm. The latter is the third incarnation. However, I appreciate that both are built more solidly (the previous 24-120 mm was optically ok and made of quality plastic rather than metal).On the other hand, I think Nikon is already taking a (good) page from Canon's book with their new f/4 lenses. That's always been a hole in Nikon's lens offering.
Remember, we don't know what the actual prices will be. Usually they are several hundy less than what Canon lists them on their website.