I read about this a few months ago. The only people that were banned had exorbitant return percentages - if you were banned - you can ask amazon and they will tell you exactly why you were banned and how high your return rate was.
Let's face it. The majority of the people who get banned will never admit to doing anything wrong - but from what I've read, people who were banned rightfully deserved it.
Additionally, if you believed you were incorrectly banned, you had the right to appeal your ban and they would review your case. The people who were on the border of their return "threshold" were given a second chance - meaning those who appealed and STILL couldn't get their accounts reinstated must have had extremely high return rates.
Posts like this just piss me off. I beat my head against the wall when my account was closed and Amazon didn't do squat, nor did they offer to repair my account case despite a lengthy e-mail correspondence back and forth.
I had reviewed all of my order detail over many years and my returns were a tiny percentage. Of course I packaged all of this up for the Amazon folks at the time. The problem I had was at the end I ordered an HDTV that arrived with a serious manufacturing defect. I'm not talking dead pixel, I'm talking something you can photograph from 8-10'. They sent a replacement, which also had a huge defect. In both cases I went through the motions. I had Pioneer send a tech to look at the TV's. Their only solution was to replace the panel in both cases, so they recommended I exchange it with the vendor. I sent Amazon photos, e-mail correspondence with Pioneer, even links to a home theater forum where people were discussing the 2 defects and a Pioneer insider had posted that their engineers were aware of the issues.
Never once did I ask for a refund. I only wanted a fully functioning product. I followed their process. I had the manufacturer check it out. I did everything they wanted by the book. In the end they closed my account because the $$ amount of the TVs weighed against the value of all my orders over time (mostly books, games, DVDs, and the occasional small electronics) exceeded a threshold they won't disclose.
In the end I got my account closed and they stuck me with a defective TV that has a dark line all the way across the screen left to right (centered vertically). The line is about an inch or so high all the way. I still have the original shipping box with the stickers on it about Amazon's "easy returns" if I have a problem.
The stupidest part was that when I called them about the second TV I told the lady I was uncomfortable with returning it because I had sent one back and didn't want to keep doing it. She's like "no way you should keep it with a problem". Of course before the replacement shipped they flagged the account and closed it.
The person with which I corresponded after that basically said that receiving 2 defective TVs in a row is not probable. When I sent him the photographs, and testimony of the manufacturer's repair tech for both... He then admitted I was telling the truth but still refused to "spare" my account. Anyways sorry for the OT rant. I just get ticked off all over again when I read these posts. What good is an "appeal process" if they admit you aren't doing anything wrong, and still won't rule in your favor?
Edit: I just reviewed some of the e-mails. My favorite statement: "We do understand that there will problems with a very small percentage of the items we ship out to customers. This means that any one customer might receive one or two items that are either defective or damaged throughout the lifetime of their account."
If that is their expectation, then they should add that verbiage to their returns policy lingo. Someone that shops there for many years can easily need more than 1-2 returns.