Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iKwak said:
The washington site can't be in the worst category. Looks good.

Yeah, and the fact you can actually read the text on the site automatically disqualifies it ;)

As it happens i noticed a pretty bad one today, which was in the referers for my site (although doesn't actually link to it) - http://www.geocities.com/eriyjake/

I've always been tempted to intentionally write a really bad website to demonstrate what you shouldn't do.
 
How about msnbc.com? Content is fine, but it only works intermittently in Firefox 0.8 (on a new Win XP pro machine). (E.g. this morning it rendered nothing but ads from about 9-11:30 easterm). I'm not as rabid anti-MS as many folks here, but you can't tell me that MS does not try to tweak users of better, non MS browers from time to time with their crappy non-compliant sites.
 
we kind of make fun of my friends site, not in front of him though. he is out to compete with my site i think. i made my web site and its a hit amongst the teachers and high students, check his out.

www.ducekin.com

iJon
 
The company I work for has perhaps the most useless corporate site in the world.

And I'm not going to provide the link because that would create more site hits than it truly deserves and some techie guy on the third floor would think his work had some sort of credence.
 
Another vote for the UW

acidrock said:
Not including porn sites, what are the worst designed sites on the net? I think this gets my vote: uni washington

Thats really funny; I am Faculty at the University of Washington and sent an email to the webmaster a couple of years ago telling them that they should be ashamed of their web site! The previous version was even worse.

Right now FedEx gets my vote since it bogs down when you are trying to track your new PowerBook using Safari. Works with Internet Exploder though!

Jon
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.