Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
When will CPU companies hurry up and use synthetic diamond instead of SOI? Synthetic diamond went up to 81GHz in lab tests!

That's the switching rate of a single transistor, not a practical clock speed for a microprocessor of any reasonable scale.
 
Has anyone tried this with Core i7? Or Xeons? I could see a 7GHz Mac Pro...

Oh and by the way... IBM's POWER 6 mainframe processors run at 5GHz. I don't know what cooling they use, but overclocking these things could be awesome (but on another thought, maybe it's the max frequency).
 
Has anyone tried this with Core i7? Or Xeons? I could see a 7GHz Mac Pro...

Oh and by the way... IBM's POWER 6 mainframe processors run at 5GHz. I don't know what cooling they use, but overclocking these things could be awesome (but on another thought, maybe it's the max frequency).

Well, seeing as current i7s overclock fine to 4.2GHz in common instances using only water cooling, I can see their potential be taken beyond and go past the 8GHz barrier.
 
Apart from the 4GB RAM limit on 32-bit OS? You're saying current computing doesn't need any more than around 3.5GB? Really?

I have ordered 8GB for my macbook, i need it for my work flow over the next 2 years. I can see more and more people needed and using more than 3.5GB ram.
 
What a load of baloney. Current Computing needs don't need 64-bit and guess what? Its happening.

I never said computing doesn't need to advance, but currently we don't need it. You want it which is very different. As per 64-bit, that we need. We are seeing applications need more room to breathe and the availability of large memory modules.

What we need is more efficient programs that can run fine without needing 10GHz.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.