Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

browser740

macrumors member
Original poster
Jun 8, 2017
89
33
I’m sure you have seen the above titles in YouTube videos. I for one am SICK of it…

But having said that , now that’s it 2026 and I don’t expect an Apple TV before march , what would you accept…

8K IS SO ridiculous, hardly any TV IS displaying it. So let’s move on.

Last March the A17 Pro processor would have been acceptable but it’s 2026 and the A20 chip will be out… So 17 18 19 20… 4 Generations behind… I would not pay money for a 17. The 18 PRO would be acceptable.

As for display, most things you watch are 60 FPS or less. If your a gamer your probably not using the Apple TV 4K. So is 120 FPS something you really want. I would think If you have movies that are HD/UHD you would want this…

Apples new com chip… I think it’s N1 or is it C1. With the new C2 chip being released the the iPhone 18… I can’t imagine Apple would issue the C2 chip with the Apple TV , but for AI purposes and the Home Control thing, it would be nice if all com chips were on the same level.

Audio, better Audio HD…

Please don’t watch the YouTube videos for Apple TV, until the new model is released. Thank you in advance!
 
An A17 Pro would still be overkill for an Apple TV. It is doubtful they would use a more powerful chipset. Apple uses one of the lowest end chipsets that is still in production for the Apple TV 4K so the A17 Pro makes the most sense.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.