Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
March on

So if the G5 Xserve is shipping in 6-8 weeks. That seems a reasonable timeframe for updating the Powermacs. And why announce the updates now when the inventory of the existing ones is pretty high.
No point in pushing tomorrow's product when you need to sell what you have today. And if they announce it 2 months before it's available - then you'll have all those folks whining about how long they have to wait.
 
Re: March on

Originally posted by strangelogic
So if the G5 Xserve is shipping in 6-8 weeks. That seems a reasonable timeframe for updating the Powermacs. And why announce the updates now when the inventory of the existing ones is pretty high.
No point in pushing tomorrow's product when you need to sell what you have today. And if they announce it 2 months before it's available - then you'll have all those folks whining about how long they have to wait.

New products from Apple ALWAYS list 6-8 weeks shipping time. They need shipping data to base ship times off of. When they haven't shipped anything, the software engine doesn't have anything to make estimates off of so it just defaults to 6-8 weeks.

Xserves are due to ship in Feburary. That's 3-7 weeks by the calendar.
:)
I'm thinking they'll ship soon, early Feb.. but I may be acting hopeful. I think the Towers will magically be announced and ship at the same time as the servers.
 
Re: Re: March on

Originally posted by ffakr


Xserves are due to ship in Feburary. That's 3-7 weeks by the calendar.
:)
I'm thinking they'll ship soon, early Feb.. but I may be acting hopeful. I think the Towers will magically be announced and ship at the same time as the servers.

I agree - makes sense to me! Start pumping out the last of the 2.0 GHz G5s in the xServes and then bring on the 2.2, 2.4 and 2.6 GHz G5s! :cool:
 
Re: Re: Steve wanted to refocus attention on GOOD things

Originally posted by Phil Of Mac
You know, that's hilarious. Before iMovie, no one wanted to their home videos on the computer and burn them to DVD. It was a crazy idea until it was easy enough for mere mortals. Making music (especially for said home videos) is gonna be the same.

Sorry, you're wrong. People have always wanted a way to edit their home videos, and before iMovie, many people had to pay professionals or use two VCRs to do it. iMovie just made it a lot easier for people to do it themselves. There is no preexisting need like that for GarageBand.

Originally posted by thatwendigo
Because iLife has been selling at something like $49 for a while now, because of iDVD? Did you complain like this when they added that feature, too?

True, but you could still download iPhoto and iMovie for free, so it didn't really matter. You were basically paying the $49 for iDVD only. I only use iTunes and iPhoto, so it was never a problem. Now I have to pay for a bunch of applications I don't want and will never use, just to be able to update the programs that I have been using for free for years.
 
Re: Re: Re: March on

Originally posted by ~Shard~
Start pumping out the last of the 2.0 GHz G5s in the xServes [...]
I don't follow what you mean since the 2.0GHz Xserve G5 uses the new 90nm processor.
 
Re: Re: Re: Steve wanted to refocus attention on GOOD things

Originally posted by jamdr
Sorry, you're wrong. People have always wanted a way to edit their home videos, and before iMovie, many people had to pay professionals or use two VCRs to do it. iMovie just made it a lot easier for people to do it themselves. There is no preexisting need like that for GarageBand.

Oh, sure there is - people editing their home movies would like to add music to them.
 
Re: Steve wanted to refocus attention on GOOD things

I've resisted 'til now, but...
Originally posted by jamdr
Now I have to pay for a bunch of applications I don't want and will never use, just to be able to update the programs that I have been using for free for years.
And you want someone besides yourself to feel pity for you? Maybe consider giving your tired argument a rest? Unless there's something new to add it seems hopelessly redundant to keep making it.

AFAIK it hasn't been confirmed by Apple whether or not certain iApps will remain downloadable. Now that would be new news...
 
One thing that is unbelievable to me in all of these post keynote discussions is how many people complain that Apple wants to get paid for all of the work they put into programs like iPhoto, iMovie, etc.

Apple is developing innovative software like they never have before. Pay them a little money and watch them use that for more innovation.
 
Re: Re: Re: Steve wanted to refocus attention on GOOD things

Originally posted by jamdr
Sorry, you're wrong. People have always wanted a way to edit their home videos, and before iMovie, many people had to pay professionals or use two VCRs to do it. iMovie just made it a lot easier for people to do it themselves. There is no preexisting need like that for GarageBand.
You sound like someone who is interested in editing movies, but not interested in playing an instrument or making music. That's OK. It's not a problem.
The problem is that you are making arguments based on your inability to understand that other people want different things.

Jobs pointed out that 50% of households have one person in it that _currently_ plays some instrument. That seems high to me, but I know it's got to be a pretty significant percentage. I was always amazed (as a guitar player) at how many guys know how to play some guitar. Nearly everyone dreams of being a rock star at some point.
So, Jobs says there is a huge market for this product. I can say that from my experience, there seems to be a large existing audience. Now figure in all the people who wanted to learn an instrument but never got around to it.. My freaking wife's uncle just bought a keyboard and is taking lessons.. and he's nearly 60. He used to play guitar 20 years ago and he always wanted to play piano! He'd love this product (and he's a PC user).

But wait, there's more. Apple's been working on this for 2 years. They have always been tied into the music industry to a high degree. You don't think that Apple did some market research before they dumped a bunch of money on this?

No wait.. you never commented when I posted that I ran across two people within 10 minutes of the end of the keynote who actually told me, seriously told me 'now I have to buy a Mac for the house'. One of these guys never used a mac till he started working with me 6 months ago.. he's a unix/linux admin. The other is an old school Mac guy who long ago gave up Apple for Unix/Linux. He's got a powerbook from the office so he had Zero need to actually buy a home mac. Even HE want's to buy a desktop for the home based on the release of GarageBand.
These people aren't rabid mac fans. They like the Apple's they use now, but they had no plans to buy one themselves. They didn't even watch the keynote, I had to tell them what was released. 2 out of the first 4 people I ran across want to buy macs now because of GarageBand.

I think you just don't get it. This is really revolutionary software. It is easy to use, Extremely cheap, and it has the features of multiple other apps that cost hundreds each.

True, but you could still download iPhoto and iMovie for free, so it didn't really matter. You were basically paying the $49 for iDVD only. I only use iTunes and iPhoto, so it was never a problem. Now I have to pay for a bunch of applications I don't want and will never use, just to be able to update the programs that I have been using for free for years.
You don't have to pay for anything.
iPhoto will still work. iTunes will still work. iDVD and iMovie will still work.
You pay if you want to upgrade all the apps. $50 for 5 excellent apps.. one entirely new. It's only $29 for anyone in Edu (or if you know someone in Edu).
BTW.. iTunes will still be updated for free. You're forgetting that they give it away to windows users too... they have to provide the updates gratis. Of course you can get all the iApps bundled with any new machine.

I think Apple did a terrible job of spoiling it's users with the iApps. They really are the MS Office for your life. I use iTunes and iPhoto individually more than the whole Office suite. The same would be true of iMovie, iDVD if I had a DV camera.. and I'll certainly use the hell out of GarageBand.
So, Apple gave away all these great apps (they have all had quirks, but they really are great apps) and people just got spoiled. How much does MS charge for an update to Office? How much would you pay for these apps from other vendors? Jobs put a price on competing products at around $300 didn't he?

I could just take these from a new machine when it comes in.. but I appreciate the work. I'm buying a copy of iLife for myself because I can't wait till I get the new G5 this summer.
It really kills me. People bitch about how Apple's market share is low.. how they have to pay too much for hardware (to cover all that R&D) but when it comes to paying $29 to $49 for something like iLife, they bitch and moan. That's less than or as much as ONE game, something that people buy and use for 10, maybe 20 hours before they finish it or move on.
I think iLife is a deal. I'm happy to toss a bit of cash back to Apple for the hard work.

Apple, thanks for GarageBand.
 
Re: Re: Re: Steve wanted to refocus attention on GOOD things

Originally posted by jamdr
Sorry, you're wrong. People have always wanted a way to edit their home videos, and before iMovie, many people had to pay professionals or use two VCRs to do it. iMovie just made it a lot easier for people to do it themselves. There is no preexisting need like that for GarageBand.

No, sorry YOU'RE WRONG. There IS a pre-existing need for GarageBand by many people, as you keep reading over and over on these forums. When will you realize your broad generalizations are incorrect and not truly representative of the interests of people here? It is one thing to say "I will not use GarageBand" but to say "There is no need for it" and that it is a stupid app that absolutely no one will buy (or words to that effect in your previous, much-quoted post), is ignorant and is simply making false statements about the Mac-using community and what their interests are.

Have fun continuing to read all the posts and replies to your comments here that over and over, prove YOU are the one who is WRONG.
 
Re: Re: my take

Originally posted by ktlx
I felt the same way. I did not find the product introductions bad or disappointing at all. However, it did seem like Steve fit 80-90 minutes worth of material into a 120 minute slot.

The Garage Band demo was like slow death. It is a neat product but not a market shaper. I am not sure dual G5 processor iBooks would justify that much time. :D


There was almost no keynote address this year. So I agree the address was stretched out a bit.

Garageband could however by "the iPod App" for Apple. It will likely generate mid range iMac product sales especially when they are upgraded.

No new speed bump upgrades obviously because they are not ready or they want EOM the current line.

I am guessing expect the next upgrade to the iMac line with G5's and then PowerMac speed bumps (maybe the 90 nm chip) and then for sure the PB line with 90 nm chips. I bet the iMac is the 20 th anniversery complete with a new Design ...Part of the Super Bowl ad ...Wouldn't that be key. So I would venture Feb 1 as the next big Apple announcement. It fits into their scheme of things.
 
Originally posted by NicoMan
Maybe better yields per waffer? The smaller the chip the lower the chance of getting a dud because of impurities in the waffer. Does that make sense?

The road map is from 130 to 90 to 60 to 45 nm chips. For speed , heat , reliabity and raw power.

The next BIG improvement to come out will be a huge speed boost for all Apps when the new IBM compiler is functional. (still in alpha or beta not sure which.)
 
What will cost you ?

At the present time we do not know the cost of upgrading your software.

We know that iLife will be a $49 upgrade to the existing version. Now you will get all the new versions + garageband.

Will iTunes upgrades still be free...yes

Will iPhoto and iMovie still be free ...we don't know


When the versions are ready in a couple of weeks and we run our updaters we will know.

Of course all macs bought in 2004 and on will include iLife or you can get it for a $19.95 fee.

Will it be part of the next OS release ..Again we don't know .
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Steve wanted to refocus attention on GOOD things

Originally posted by ffakr
So, Apple gave away all these great apps (they have all had quirks, but they really are great apps) and people just got spoiled. How much does MS charge for an update to Office? How much would you pay for these apps from other vendors? Jobs put a price on competing products at around $300 didn't he?

My only peeve is that Apple doesn't seem to want to sell the iApps separately: I only use iTunes (though I can't wait to get my hands on GarageBand). But given that they cost $49 in total - and I'd willingly pay that for GarageBand alone - I'm not too worried!
 
Originally posted by ddtlm
If these really are 90nm chips and not some typo, then they sure are a dissapointment. Still 2.0ghz, still 512k L2, apparently no architecture improvements (because the transistor count didn't noticably change). Does IBM plan on making a 90nm G5 with a meaningfully-sized L2, and if so, why didn't Apple use it in their servers?
I think the whole point was to achieve the same performance for less power (to be able to put the G5 in the XServe). Now it doesn't mean that we won't get faster, more powerful G5s in the PowerMac relatively soon. They already have a new chip in the pipeline (PPC980) if we believe the rumors, so the point is to milk the current design as much as they can.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Steve wanted to refocus attention on GOOD things

Originally posted by whooleytoo
My only peeve is that Apple doesn't seem to want to sell the iApps separately: I only use iTunes (though I can't wait to get my hands on GarageBand). But given that they cost $49 in total - and I'd willingly pay that for GarageBand alone - I'm not too worried!
Agreed.
Don't get me wrong, I'd be lying if I said I don't mind at all the fact iLife'04 won't be free...
BUT
we need to put all this into perspective: 4 quality apps (5 minus iTunes - free) for $49... $49!!! That's about $12.5 per app. Compare this with the countless useless shareware programs that people pay for without blinking because it's only $10-15...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.