The article is of course talking about gross margins per unit. Not accumulated income. That would be stupid, considering the iPhone the last 5 years.That's silly.
I'd not be surprised if Apple has even made 1 cent profit yet.
Just think how much they have invested since the day they though "let's make a watch" and how many they will have to sell the recoup all of that outlay.
That's silly.
I'd not be surprised if Apple has even made 1 cent profit yet.
Just think how much they have invested since the day they though "let's make a watch" and how many they will have to sell the recoup all of that outlay.
That's silly.
I'd not be surprised if Apple has even made 1 cent profit yet.
Just think how much they have invested since the day they though "let's make a watch" and how many they will have to sell the recoup all of that outlay.
This is the most successful "smart-watch" ever made by initial indications, and all you have to say is this comment?
You have knocking this thing since the beginning. I don't get all the negativity you associate with this product.
This is the most successful "smart-watch" ever made by initial indications, and all you have to say is this comment?
You have knocking this thing since the beginning. I don't get all the negativity you associate with this product.
I'm not knocking the product, I'm saying that articles way of thinking is stupid.
So you make cakes and you want to start making donuts.
So you spend 2 years with your staff planning the donuts out, hundreds of staff being paid to work on the project.
You then, find land to build your donut factory, build it, costs you 100 million dollars to make this plant, you then spend the next 6 months promoting the product, spending even more millions to get the public to want them.
You launch and sell 2 million.
yay
Long way to go yet, and a long long way before your costs are recouped and you start making any profit, you may make a few more million and the public go off donuts.
I'm not knocking the product, I'm saying that articles way of thinking is stupid.
So you make cakes and you want to start making donuts.
So you spend 2 years with your staff planning the donuts out, hundreds of staff being paid to work on the project.
You then, find land to build your donut factory, build it, costs you 100 million dollars to make this plant, you then spend the next 6 months promoting the product, spending even more millions to get the public to want them.
You launch and sell 2 million.
yay
Long way to go yet, and a long long way before your costs are recouped and you start making any profit, you may make a few more million and the public go off donuts.
Actually, aside from people using AMEX cards, consumer accounts haven't even been charged yet, have they? So they may have on paper had big sales (no one knows the actual numbers), until they start charging cards and shipping units, I am in Piggie's corner...they haven't started to get their return on investment yet. Even then the first watch is the most expensive, the last one will be the cheapest (read most profitable). It is entirely possible that the first million or two watches are at cost and they are counting on watch sales (and app store, and accessories, and licensing) in the future to be where the real money is.They sold 3M. They made about $2 Billion. I'd say that's pretty damn good and probably covered a lot, if not all of their R&D, etc. And that was just the first two weeks.
I don't think the first version will generate a lot of profit. They've spent millions if not billions on developing, researching and testing hardware and software, creating manufacturing facilities etc. for it. You cannot just calculate their profit by simply doing (retail price)-(BOM)...