A better photo library application?

Discussion in 'Mac Apps and Mac App Store' started by ArisaemaDracont, Feb 8, 2018.

  1. ArisaemaDracont macrumors member

    ArisaemaDracont

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Location:
    Madison
    #1
    I need a more robust photo library program. I need to share between multiple computers on a network and be able to tag photos easily, and have geotagging functions as well.

    Photos doesn't do tagging well, iPhotos and Aperture don't play well shared over a network.

    What are some options?
     
  2. kirky29 macrumors 65816

    kirky29

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Location:
    Lincolnshire, England
  3. TiggrToo macrumors 6502a

    TiggrToo

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Location:
    Out there...way out there
    #3
    For $150 for the discontinued Lightroom 6 or $9.99 for Creative Cloud Photography package that includes 7, it better be. Surely there are better cheaper (maybe even free?) options out there...
     
  4. ArisaemaDracont thread starter macrumors member

    ArisaemaDracont

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Location:
    Madison
    #4
    I’m willing to pay for a good product, but I want to host the photos locally on our small company’s macMini server, not in the cloud, and I don’t want to pay a subscription fee.

    My needs are primarily organization and tagging, not editing/manipulation.
     
  5. jasnw macrumors 6502a

    jasnw

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Location:
    Seattle Area (NOT! Microsoft)
    #5
    I've not made the jump from iPhoto yet, but have seen good words about Lyn and Pixave.
     
  6. robgendreau macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    #6
    Lr can access and reference images on a NAS or locally mounted server, but it's not a multi-user DAM. For that you need something like Daminion, but I think the server side might be Windows only. There's a list of other DAMs here: https://www.capterra.com/sem-compare/digital-asset-management-software?headline=Digital Asset Manager Software&gclid=CjwKCAiAk4XUBRB5EiwAHBLUMW-vCxptUz6T-LxVIfDg3QudUhkzc7qaGgoD-Gh9ciTeOUHmozHo2RoC38YQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

    Since your needs seem pretty lightweight, and maybe not enterprise level, maybe Photo Supreme. It can run in a shared environment with a client and server. Requires PostgreSQL be installed on the server, and uses licensing based on users. BTW, on sale right now, act fast!

    If that's still too much (money or effort), your best choice would be Lr (getting past the subscription objection) and organize single-use instances of Lr and/or Bridge so that people aren't stepping over each other in editing the same photos differently. Say if one person adds the metadata, initial development, and then the others just use Bridge to access photos for say product catalog placement, insertion in newsletters, etc. Tough to find something on a Mac that does the keywording, georeferencing, and all the other metadata work of Lr in one package.
     
  7. jedwards87 Suspended

    Joined:
    May 21, 2015
    #7
  8. ArisaemaDracont thread starter macrumors member

    ArisaemaDracont

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Location:
    Madison
    #8
    UPDATE:

    I gave Lyn a try. I liked that it just worked with image files which are stored in folders, rather than a "library" file that can get corrupted. I would also assume this would mean that multiple staff members could access the image library from different computers at the same time, as long as they weren't editing the same file at the same time.

    Unfortunately, Lyn is very poor at using keywords. I need to be able to search keywords and batch apply them, which does not seem possible in Lyn.

    I guess I'll look at ACDsee and Pixave.

    I remember that Aperture has the ability to manage photos within a library or out of a library (there is a term for this I can't recall at the moment). I'm kind of wondering if I just use Aperture to export the photo library and manage it that way rather than as a "library", if I can keep trucking without the file permission errors... at least until an OS upgrade finally kills Aperture.
    --- Post Merged, Mar 2, 2018 ---
    OK, I looked up the Aperture feature. There are Managed libraries where all the photos are in there, and Referenced photos, that are not in the library, but the data you save about them IS in the library.

    I suppose, in theory I could have an Aperture library on each computer in the office that references a folder full of photos on the server. But then each Aperture library would have to be set-up individually... I'm not sure how this would impact applying keywords and such, if the original files are altered in that they have keywords applied to them or if the keywords are stored in the Library, in association with the photo.

    That, and Aperture is EOL.
     
  9. robgendreau macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    #9
    If you use Aperture (shudder) then yes, you can use a referenced (vs managed) library. And you can write the metadata changes to file with the Write IPTC Metadata to File command. Unlike Lr, you can't write in adjustment parameters themselves, so remember whoever accesses the image is gonna get the master plus IPTC, like say caption and keywords. But if others don't need adjusted images, it would work. They could use Spotlight and any old image browser that can do keywords to find stuff.

    If you want free, just use Bridge to keyword. Or if you want to get something more powerful, Photo Mechanic. It's the best keyword application for photos period. Both can do templates and such for fast keywording, and PM can do geotagging. I prefer HoudahGeo, but it's mostly just for that.
     
  10. camelia macrumors 6502

    camelia

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2015
    Location:
    Mexico City
    #10
    Is Lightroom 6 32-bits or 64-bits?
     
  11. TiggrToo macrumors 6502a

    TiggrToo

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Location:
    Out there...way out there
    #11
    As far as I know 6 was only ever available in a 64 bit version.
     
  12. CLS727 macrumors regular

    CLS727

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2018
    #12
    Google Photos is currently the best app for this.....

    And they have macOS and iOS apps for it.

    I use 100% apple hardware..... but do not use iPhoto at all.
     
  13. Serge88 macrumors member

    Serge88

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    #13
    If you're looking for a DAM and not a photo editor, Entermediadb is the best. You can have one or thousand of users. And it's open source.

    https://entermediadb.org
     

Share This Page

12 February 8, 2018