Sorry, there was an issue with this entry. It's fixed now, shouldn't be asked to fill anything in.
But if one did enter something prior to your company "fixing" it, does our entry still count?
Sorry, there was an issue with this entry. It's fixed now, shouldn't be asked to fill anything in.
Though unless the thieves think it's a sort of safe, they are less likely to take a 15 pound external HDD with them, there prefer a higher value to weight ratio....any disaster except burglary.
But if one did enter something prior to your company "fixing" it, does our entry still count?![]()
So, you are putting them at least into a low orbit around Earth.Yeah, let's launch a few hard drives into the space in case Earth is attacked by monsters.
I am sticking with the cloud services![]()
I agree. I work for an Apple reseller and 30% having backups seems wayyyy closer my experience.
Unfortunately, managing a Synology NAS requires Java. And since it's done using a web browser, that means that you must have Java enabled in the browser.
I would much rather not have Java, and not have it enabled. But there's no choice, it seems. Maybe I could disable it in all browsers except one.
This is completely false.
I don't have a single bit of Java installed on my Mac, PC, or Linux box, and can manage my DS215j without any problems. Browsers I've used have been Safari, Firefox, and Opera.
BL.
Anyone know what kind/brand of mini wireless AP this is in the picture sitting on top of the ioSafe?
Its tiny!
It used to be required. The file browser on their web manager was Java based. It's not anymore though. The past few versions in the past year and a half or so have been a dream to work with.
After Synology's poor handling of the Synolock ransomware, I will never get another Synology product. I lost so much data and my NAS is still a brick.
You do realize that the Synolock issue was taken care of by a patch that you didn't apply, right? Since it was fixed, you left your NAS vulnerable. You'd only have yourself to blame for that.
BL.
No, I don't have myself to blame. I wasn't notified of an issue or a patch. I was away from my NAS for about 3 months and during that time I lost remote access to my files. Synology left my NAS vulnerable as that vulnerability should have never existed in the first place.
Description
It is confirmed that Synology NAS servers running older versions of DiskStation Manager are being targeted by a ransomware known as SynoLocker, which exploits two vulnerabilities that were fixed in November and December, 2013, respectively. At that time, Synology released security updates and notified users to update via various channels.
The cloud just means you are relying on someone else to keep all of your precious memories both protected and secure. Nothing beats something at home for security and speed. Cloud is only handy in my experience for data you do not care if someone else got hold of.
I hope you understand that's not how software works. Furthermore, you always have the option to run your NAS offline (for local backups only) and never having to worry about vulnerabilities or hackers. If you connect a device of any kind to the internet, you assume the risk of ransomware, malware, rootkits, etc. affecting your device(s).Synology left my NAS vulnerable as that vulnerability should have never existed in the first place.
they specifically said, they think the cloud is great, but for anything above about a terabyte its easier to store it on a hard drive.
If the basement is flooded (from the water used to extinguish the flames or just plain old flood), the tupperware box floats up.