Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Chip NoVaMac said:
Yeah, but there was a more recent example in the regular MR forums that a member specifically used the top bannable phrase, and their posts and the ones that followed were quietly deleted, and that is all that seems to have happened. It just struck me odd.

Just out of curiosity, do you mean something of the "you are an idiot" variety, or something else? Hmmm, just curiosity I guess. I guess I can even stomach that, as long as there are no explicit, intentional racial / ethnic / sexual orientation slurs, I'm pretty happy. The only time I felt hurt by one-such, it wasn't intentional, and the person edited it out right away when I complained. So even that wasn't so bad.

The only time I know of, where I explicitly pissed someone off here, I went back and edited out what I had said and put a sorry in its place. And then he was banned for some unrelated reason a week later. So I guess I win and I don't have to feel too too bad. :p

EDIT: Oh, I wanted to add...I have reservations about the "keep it between the mod and the user" view. I mod somewhere else, where I have the ability to delete posts or edit content out, but not to ban people. There can quickly be a flame war and bad feelings if the reason for a ban is stated, but OTOH, if it is done silently, there are also a lot of hurt feelings, and it puts a damper on the whole community, because people start to get paranoid and believe bans are arbitrary and high-handed, and they don't feel comfortable participating anymore, either because they're afraid of being banned or because the seeming irrationality of the action (because they don't know the reason) puts them off.

So I guess my view is that it is beneficial to state briefly why a person was banned, just for the whole group. No invective, not necessarily even discussion. Perhaps even a closed thread that just gets opened by a mod to add a post saying something like "X was banned because she violated the following rule: she poked a badger with a spoon."
 
mkrishnan said:
Just out of curiosity, do you mean something of the "you are an idiot" variety, or something else? Hmmm, just curiosity I guess. I guess I can even stomach that, as long as there are no explicit, intentional racial / ethnic / sexual orientation slurs, I'm pretty happy. The only time I felt hurt by one-such, it wasn't intentional, and the person edited it out right away when I complained. So even that wasn't so bad.

The only time I know of, where I explicitly pissed someone off here, I went back and edited out what I had said and put a sorry in its place. And then he was banned for some unrelated reason a week later. So I guess I win and I don't have to feel too too bad. :p

You just have to read the rules to see the comment that will result in a banning. I understand where you are coming from though.

Too had a user question a comment that I made in joking. I apologized and edited that comment (I think it was in the Political Forum).
 
mkrishnan said:
"X was banned because she violated the following rule: she poked a badger with a spoon."

Hmm, poking a badger with a spoon is illegal eh? Hope it's not for poking it with a fork....

<looks around suspiously>

<Back on topic>
When the same thing happened to me, the mods basically said "well, we delete a zillion posts a day, and don't have time to send out anything". I always wondered why you just couldn't have something coded into the forum software that the mod could just check off 'off topic', 'obscene', etc and let the forum send out the email. At least that way you'd know which mod had deleted and a rough reason why.
 
relimw said:
Hmm, poking a badger with a spoon is illegal eh? Hope it's not for poking it with a fork....

<looks around suspiously>
Watch out, too much forking around in the threads will probably get the thread sent to the wasteland.

Doing it with a badger ... is rather kinky, and probably illegal, not to mention dangerous.
 
Sun Baked said:
Watch out, too much forking around in the threads will probably get the thread sent to the wasteland.

Doing it with a badger ... is rather kinky, and probably illegal, not to mention dangerous.

I guess spooning is out then also. :rolleyes: :p
 
mkrishnan said:
So I guess my view is that it is beneficial to state briefly why a person was banned, just for the whole group. No invective, not necessarily even discussion. Perhaps even a closed thread that just gets opened by a mod to add a post saying something like "X was banned because she violated the following rule: she poked a badger with a spoon."

That would be a good idea, IMO. The free you-know-whats people don't need threads like this, and the number of "real" members that get banned is pretty low. It is nice-- kind of like a "Don't do this or else" to the rest of us.

With that being said, please don't ban me! :)
 
Mechcozmo said:
That would be a good idea, IMO. The free you-know-whats people don't need threads like this, and the number of "real" members that get banned is pretty low. It is nice-- kind of like a "Don't do this or else" to the rest of us.

With that being said, please don't ban me! :)

Just curious, but how does one go from being 'banned' to being a 'demi-god?' Jimsowden made that leap VERY quickly, I believe. What's the jimmy's secret?
 
I think you would want to do this with a PM..

I didn't bother reading the whole article, so someone might have mentioned this allready..

To quote Arn:

"Posting a public outcry is frowned upon."

linka!
 
keysersoze said:
Just curious, but how does one go from being 'banned' to being a 'demi-god?' Jimsowden made that leap VERY quickly, I believe. What's the jimmy's secret?

Perhaps he apologised or ironed things out with the mods, and then made a contribution within a few days... it is – or was* – that simple to acquire demi/contributor status. Why don't you ask him?




*The contributor scheme is under review and is currently closed.
 
keysersoze said:
Just curious, but how does one go from being 'banned' to being a 'demi-god?' Jimsowden made that leap VERY quickly, I believe. What's the jimmy's secret?

Monopoly charges $50 to get out of jail. Perhaps, there is a similar rule. :D

I've yet to see a post removed for the wrong reason. It seems odd that mymemory would actually have a useful post and it was actually deleted. He seems to be the luckiest of all people in these forums, as far as not being banned after so many objectionable threads/posts. Who else would still be here after making terrible remarks against a certain group?

Is English the problem? I don't think it should be any more difficult for Venezuelans than it is for the Dutch, German, Spanish, French, or Japanese.
 
keysersoze said:
Just curious, but how does one go from being 'banned' to being a 'demi-god?' Jimsowden made that leap VERY quickly, I believe. What's the jimmy's secret?

He was placed on a short (3-day) ban and after working things out with the mods/arn paid his contributor fee. Pretty simple. :)
 
Blue Velvet said:
Perhaps he apologised or ironed things out with the mods, and then made a contribution within a few days... it is – or was* – that simple to acquire demi/contributor status. Why don't you ask him?




*The contributor scheme is under review and is currently closed.

So it is closed!? I've been looking for it all day! I don't have any need for a fancy title, but the forums have been running slow lately, and I was thinking about maybe donating some to the site. (not decided yet tho.)

Thanks for clearing things out.! :)
 
mymemory said:
Well... I think we have found the subject who is affraid to go over this topic in public and who think is not a big deal to go over some one elses post just because he felt like it.

So, I would sugest, at list in my case because I do think is a BIG DEAL, to be notify of the issue when my post is deleted.

Sometimes I do like to pick on some one but other times I just feel some answers goes over some peoples head. Moderators are not perfect machines, are humans and obviously some can be more mistaken than others. Call my attention that edesignuk is the only one how feel agravated by the issue "There's really no need for this to be public".

Again, the last post that was deleted was about me telling the G5 was not fast enough (read my signature) and it was deleted. That shows a lack of principals and is actually making Macrumors other than pacefully place just because there are not rules. If I had the answer of 5 moderators I would say there is at list some sort of profile but I think we have found the one who is acting by his own rules.

So, edesignuk, if you are going to delete something I wrote take the time to PM me (because looks like you feel good using them) and tell me about it next time. Those are called manners just to let you now.
Oh, I remember, the thread where, after dozens of posts, we find out that you loaded a G4 laptop OS X image on the G5 and wouldn't accept the idea that that *may* just have something to do with the fact that it wasn't running correctly. Of course, we can't forget that you also bought the G5 with every intention of using it for your work for a couple of weeks and then taking it back for a refund; basically a free rental on the sly. Boohoo, I feel sorry to hear about your deleted posts.
 
keysersoze said:
Just curious, but how does one go from being 'banned' to being a 'demi-god?' Jimsowden made that leap VERY quickly, I believe. What's the jimmy's secret?

Cold, hard, cash. :confused: ;) :p

I'm content with working my way up to whatever you can go for free. Then I'm gonna see about donating. Etc.
 
mkrishnan said:
Perhaps even a closed thread that just gets opened by a mod to add a post saying something like "X was banned because she violated the following rule: she poked a badger with a spoon."
And apparently it's illegal to put squirrels down your pants for the purposes of gambling. Yes, I did have to make an obscure Simpsons reference.

Seriously though, I think that's a good idea. Instead of just deleting the offense, I'd like to see it Wastlelanded or something. I realize some things, like stuff in the Private or even Political forums, can't just be sent there, but it is weird when someone just suddenly gets banned and we can't figure out why. Sometimes it's obvious, but sometimes, not so much.

Maybe I should just stop letting my curiousity get the better of me, but I think a "here's how to get banned" thread would be kinda cool. Even if it is censored.
 
solvs said:
And apparently it's illegal to put squirrels down your pants for the purposes of gambling. Yes, I did have to make an obscure Simpsons reference.

Seriously though, I think that's a good idea. Instead of just deleting the offense, I'd like to see it Wastlelanded or something. I realize some things, like stuff in the Private or even Political forums, can't just be sent there, but it is weird when someone just suddenly gets banned and we can't figure out why. Sometimes it's obvious, but sometimes, not so much.

Maybe I should just stop letting my curiousity get the better of me, but I think a "here's how to get banned" thread would be kinda cool. Even if it is censored.

Consider that putting it in Wasteland still takes server space, deleting it will (eventually) remove it from the server.
 
Chip NoVaMac said:
Sort of OT, but do Wasteland threads show up in the search?

I typed "Free iPod" in the search bar, and I got a wastelanded thread in the results, but only one. And a bunch of non-wastelanded threads complaining about wastelanded threads advertising free iPods. ;)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.