A new, modular Apple Computer?

No. MP users want to be able to pick their own monitors.

You have described an iMac with the computer located in the stand instead of behind the screen.

 

So... that?

 

ya, that was the first really attractive Mac I remember in modern history. I wouldn't mind owning one now, just for looks.

 

hahaha thats so brilliant! I used to really love mine back when... such a funny looking thing now though. Wish I had kept it!

C

 

You beat me too it.


I got to the third line of the OP's post and started looking for the image further down the thread.

 

Apple is actually pretty poor at display design. Looking at companies like NEC they use the same panel options as Apple, but it's in what they do with them. Not many people care about the size of the machine. They want features (in terms of ram, cpu, gpu, etc.), a stable machine, and the ability to swap out something like a hard drive without hauling the machine in for servicing.

Once we start to see high resolution displays on macbook pros and ipads, those imac displays are going to look a lot more lackluster.

 

Deep space may remain the best solution?

 

By the way I did like the older G4 imac design better . I thought it looked better and it didn't have the issue of taking off the display to access the computer. Just being old doesn't make it a bad design.

You got me on that one . That was possibly the best display Apple ever made. I thought they did really well hitting a price point and a reasonable level of quality on massive screen real estate. It also profiled quite well and had better contrast stability when turned down than their other displays. The eizo 30" was way way way better, but it was just so expensive and came out later. You'd have to see it to appreciate it. I've never seen another brand with a 30" display that had that kind of uniformity.


Anyway both NEC and Eizo are great companies that engineer complete solutions for accurate displays, but Apple likes things that are thin and pretty with backlights that are glaringly bright . They've made decisions on how to market their line, and there's no currently workable solution to making an imac with a swappable display as long as the computer will remain behind the lcd panel. These others use ccfl backlights on their top displays (led only on the consumer grade ones due to color issues) and require a lot of dedicated hardware. Trying to engineer all of that into a dropin solution for Apple's imac would drive the price through the roof unless the computer was moved back into the base.

All in one could be a stronger solution one day, but today it still has too many compromises and parts like hard drives, displays, and gpus do fail, so having a non user serviceable machine is one of those compromises.

 

What you've described here is arguably less modular than the current Mac Pro.

The whole concept behind the iMac is that it is all in one. Open box. Plug in. Turn on. Done. As long as the iMac exists that basic premise will never change--nor should it.

I do like the idea of a modular Mac Pro however. As a Pro user who often works with other Pro users I can say that every user's needs are different and most of us attach all kinds of peripheral devices to our machines. Few of us rely on the internal HDD's or the optical drive.

I'd like to see a rack mountable unit that includes a fast processor, high quality (but still interchangeable) video card and two 256GB SSD's (for RAID) with obviously user upgradeable RAM. On the back you would find various firewire, USB 2.0/3.0, PCIE, Thunderbolt, audio and HDMI i/o's.

This kind of design could keep the entry price relatively low, making it accessible to existing users who already have most of their peripherals in place and attractive to newer users as well.