This isn't really a comparison, it's just a quick overview of the watch for a couple of days, the good and bad.
Heart Rate: I did a run with both watches. On the Fenix I had Stryd connected and a Wahoo forearm strap. The pulse rate between the two was basically the same for the entirety, I think one beat higher on the AW for my max heart rate. The average was the same. So, I think the heart rate accuracy is still good, certainly better than an unaided Fenix.
GPS: It seems to record the tracks a bit more accurately, meaning I don't run down the middle of the road and through back yards, but it still has the same distance problems. I did a 5K (3.12 miles) and the AW recorded 3.19. This is exactly what prior versions have done and I have pretty good faith in the Fenix in the area I tested it.
Battery: It seems better but no hard metrics. I'd probably put it near the 4 and with faster charging so it's an improvement. It also doesn't seem to eat battery on GPS as badly as I remember but I'd have to take it to 100% and test, which I probably won't do in the next few days.
Fit: I'm including this because it seems like the backside is bigger than before making the watch less comfortable. It seems like it digs in more than it used to or is harder or something. I've wound up loosening the band to the point that it's too loose to use for brief periods of time.
PulseOx: This seems like a good implementation, and reliably produces a result something the Fenix doesn't do, but it needs better data transparency. I went low 90's while sleeping but I can't figure out if I did it briefly (probably), or all night. It seems fairly accurate during the day, and runs a bit higher than the Fenix which I expected based on finger readings I've had done.
No conclusions. I'll probably keep it, or for some reason, I seem to want a SS gold one this time so maybe I'll get that. I'd like to try it with cell service and it looks like I can do that without burying myself in fees if I'm lucky.
Heart Rate: I did a run with both watches. On the Fenix I had Stryd connected and a Wahoo forearm strap. The pulse rate between the two was basically the same for the entirety, I think one beat higher on the AW for my max heart rate. The average was the same. So, I think the heart rate accuracy is still good, certainly better than an unaided Fenix.
GPS: It seems to record the tracks a bit more accurately, meaning I don't run down the middle of the road and through back yards, but it still has the same distance problems. I did a 5K (3.12 miles) and the AW recorded 3.19. This is exactly what prior versions have done and I have pretty good faith in the Fenix in the area I tested it.
Battery: It seems better but no hard metrics. I'd probably put it near the 4 and with faster charging so it's an improvement. It also doesn't seem to eat battery on GPS as badly as I remember but I'd have to take it to 100% and test, which I probably won't do in the next few days.
Fit: I'm including this because it seems like the backside is bigger than before making the watch less comfortable. It seems like it digs in more than it used to or is harder or something. I've wound up loosening the band to the point that it's too loose to use for brief periods of time.
PulseOx: This seems like a good implementation, and reliably produces a result something the Fenix doesn't do, but it needs better data transparency. I went low 90's while sleeping but I can't figure out if I did it briefly (probably), or all night. It seems fairly accurate during the day, and runs a bit higher than the Fenix which I expected based on finger readings I've had done.
No conclusions. I'll probably keep it, or for some reason, I seem to want a SS gold one this time so maybe I'll get that. I'd like to try it with cell service and it looks like I can do that without burying myself in fees if I'm lucky.