I guess the best argument there is battery life. My point though was perceived speed isn’t an issue anymore for most such activities. A12 is already very, very fast in that regard. That’s why on iPhone SoCs, Apple prioritized small cores not big. There are four efficiency cores and two performance cores.
Put it this way, for such basic daily activities as you descrribe, I don’t feel that even the A10 on the 7 Plus is slow on an iPhone, and that’s a four year old SoC. However, I can notice occasional pauses, which I attribute to insufficient RAM, not SoC performance.
It’s different on an iPad though. Whereas A10 is very fast with mobile websites aimed at phones for example, you now can feel some slowdowns on the desktop sites you get on iPads. It’s not bad at all on A10, but the difference can be noticeable, esp. when you multi-task. Interestingly though, multi-core largely solves this problem too, as an A10X iPad Pro feels faster for surfing desktop sites than A10 does.
—-
Meanwhile, some Twitter user is claiming the iPhone 12 mini will have a lower performance chip called B14, postulated to be a downclocked version of A14.
The soon-to-be-released iPhone 12 Mini will allegedly run a scaled-down version of the A14 Bionic. Dubbed as the Apple B14, the chip will also appear alongside subsequent variants of the iPhone SE. The B14 is, in all likelihood, an underclocked A14 Bionic fine-tuned for efficiency instead of...
www.notebookcheck.net