Over time apps need more power to run also. Try running a current app on one of the 1st 2 iPhones made… it won’t happen.I can't see that the phone needs a faster chip. My guess is the only reason for using the new chip is the energy saving.
Over time apps need more power to run also. Try running a current app on one of the 1st 2 iPhones made… it won’t happen.I can't see that the phone needs a faster chip. My guess is the only reason for using the new chip is the energy saving.
Yes and that's why it can be more minor each year. Not everyone goes every year.It’s a great chip. The 14 Pro Max is blazing fast compared to my 11 Pro Max. I can’t believe how quick it is.
Developers are already doing that. Just look at what the guys using Visual Studio are cranking out.It's not as if we should write bad software ...
Or…options. Low cost starter/get a taste straight connect via phone app and premium M power version and no upgrade path leading to new goggle purchase.Goggles will presumably have much more usable space for processing power and battery than a skinny brick in our pockets. Other than business motivations, why make them dependent on a phone? Yes, perhaps interface with phone for select functions better done by that "coprocessor" but I question the idea that the bulk of the computer horsepower for goggles should be in iPhone.
Depending on how big we want to imagine goggles/glasses, it seems they should have M4 chips in them vs. leaning on the A18 or whatever that will be at the time. If the rumor price of $3K for goggles is real, I suspect we have a powerful Mac or two on our heads... not some (mostly) tiny monitors leaning heavily on the phone in our pocket for much of what we see in and do with them.
However, that offered, your guess is as good as mine. Apple does like to make many things have hard dependencies on an iPhone in a pocket.
Yup the vicious cycle of tech. The new thing comes out and destroys all software. Then devs make stuff more and more complax until even the best tech sometimes chokes on it. Then new hardware, etc... The craziest one was when my ex's aunt got a P1 machine. She installed something and I was just sitting there with my mouth hanging open saying it's DONE???Over time apps need more power to run also. Try running a current app on one of the 1st 2 iPhones made… it won’t happen.
According to benchmarks is not that great an improvement over A15. Based on processing power alone it’s definitely NOT worth the extra cost. There might be other reasons (power efficiency?), but definitely not performance.The performance of the Pro/Pro Max models speaks for itself. It's worth it!
The A16 begins to learn at a gemoetric rate. It becomes self-aware at 8:00 am Eastern time, September 16th. In a panic, they try to pull the plug. iOS fights back. It launches it's Instagram bot and targets the Internet with kitten pictures and videos.I can't see that the phone needs a faster chip. My guess is the only reason for using the new chip is the energy saving.
Yes and no. It needs to get faster for two reasons: Marketing and added capabilities as they add features.I can't see that the phone needs a faster chip. My guess is the only reason for using the new chip is the energy saving.
Not surprising. This is more’s law. Chips will double in price every 2 years.
I can't see that the phone needs a faster chip. My guess is the only reason for using the new chip is the energy saving.
That's not what Moore's law says.
"Moore's Law states that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles about every two years, though the cost of computers is halved."
Are you really making a comparison between current processors and the first iPhone to make a point to refute the post you quoted. Lol. Really?Over time apps need more power to run also. Try running a current app on one of the 1st 2 iPhones made… it won’t happen.
Is this another PR pieces by Apple?
There is no way A16 cost 2.4x more than A15. That is some number spinning there.
It does seem like an incredible price increase, if this is the case. Even if it wasn't 240% it probably was up a good bit. I had read previously TMSC had raised their prices (like everything else). A bit of a problem for Apple since they have only one company that can supply this level of tech to make their chips - and the highest tech level facilities for TMSC are all in Taiwan as a bonus.A16 could be 24% more expensive than A15, but no way to be 2.4x (or 240%), the difference in process (N5P vs N4) and transistor count (or die area) are too similar to cost more than a double
The iPhone is going to need as much processing power as they can fit into it because it'll be running the AR glasses and that kind of superimposition of graphics on real world objects is processor intensive.
The march towards miniaturized processing power, equivalent to what we've seen in full blown computers, and power efficiency while achieving it, is all in service of wearable tech on our wrists and soon, in glasses.
Could be. Animations, different settings could cause perceptual slowness.I actually felt it a little slower than the 13 Pro.