Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,483
37,748


Apple introduced new second-generation 3-nanometer chips for both the iPhone 16 and the iPhone 16 Pro models, bringing notable improvements in performance. The iPhone 16 and 16 Plus have an A18 chip, while the iPhone 16 Pro and Pro Max have an A18 Pro chip.

a18-chip.jpg

The chips are similar, but there are some differences to be aware of, along with differences in the iPhone 16 and 16 Pro thermal design.
A18 and A18 Pro Shared Features

  • Built on second-generation 3-nm process with smaller transistors.
  • 6-core CPU with four performance cores and two efficiency cores.
  • Upgraded 16-core Neural Engine optimized for running large generative models.
  • Upgraded memory subsystem with 17 percent more memory bandwidth.
A18/iPhone 16 Features

The A18 has a 5-core GPU rather than the 6-core GPU in the A18 Pro.

The iPhone 16 models have a new thermal design. Apple says that it updated the main logic board, centralizing chip placement and optimizing the surrounding architecture. There's a recycled aluminum substructure that dissipates heat for 30 percent higher sustained performance for gaming.

The A18 also adds hardware accelerated ray tracing, a feature that was available in the iPhone 15 Pro models with A17 Pro, but is new to the standard iPhone lineup. Hardware accelerated ray tracing is useful for gaming, and the iPhone 16 models can run all of the console-quality games that Apple touted for the iPhone 15 Pro models last year.

A18 Pro/iPhone 16 Pro Features

The A18 Pro has the same 6-core CPU as the A18, as well as the same Neural Engine, but it has one more GPU core for a 6-core GPU instead of a 5-core GPU.

According to Apple, the iPhone 16 Pro maximizes thermal capacity with a machined chassis that uses 100 percent recycled aluminum. It is bonded to the titanium frame using solid state diffusion, and it is combined with a graphite clad aluminum substructure. The new thermal architecture enables a 20 percent improvement in sustained gaming performance compared to the A17 Pro.

A18 Performance

Compared to the A16 Bionic chip, the A18's CPU is 30 percent faster, and it offers the same performance while using 30 percent less power.

The GPU is 40 percent faster than the A16 Bionic GPU, and it is also more efficient. It offers the same performance using 35% less power.

The new Neural Engine is 2x faster for machine learning than the Neural Engine in the A16 Bionic chip.

A18 Pro Performance

The 6-core A18 Pro CPU is 15 percent faster than the A17 Pro CPU, and it delivers the same performance using 20 percent less power. Apple says that it is the fastest CPU in any smartphone, with next-generation ML accelerators that are directly programmable for high-efficiency, high throughput and low latency computations.

The 6-core GPU is 20 percent faster than the GPU in the A17 Pro, and hardware accelerated ray tracing is 2x faster.

The upgraded Neural Engine is faster and more efficient than the Neural Engine in the A17 Pro. Apple says that Apple Intelligence features run 15 percent faster on the A18 Pro than the A17 Pro.

There is a new advanced display engine for ProMotion, a new video encoder, and a new image signal processor. Combined, they process twice the amount of data for fast video encoding and improved efficiency.

Article Link: A18 vs. A18 Pro: What's the Difference?
 
Last edited:
Compared to the standard A18, the A18 Pro also includes wider memory bandwidth and larger caches, enabling support for some "Advanced media" features, including always-on display and ProRes video recording.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1180.jpeg
    IMG_1180.jpeg
    93.4 KB · Views: 973
This is similar to what Apple did with the iPhone 13 series; the regular 13 and mini had a 4 core GPU and the Pro had a 5 core GPU. It makes sense that Apple would at least give the two chips distinct names to imply the difference, though I don’t know if a single GPU core elevates the chip to being “Pro” versus the base chip.
 
I think this could be the first time in a while that Snapdragon takes the lead in CPU performance since %15 is basically nothing and they were super close even using 4nm silicon.
And I would take their efficiency claims with grain of salt, they claimed A17 Pro would be significantly more efficient as well, and battery life was barely better than two years old 13 Pro Max.
 
This is similar to what Apple did with the iPhone 13 series; the regular 13 and mini had a 4 core GPU and the Pro had a 5 core GPU. It makes sense that Apple would at least give the two chips distinct names to imply the difference, though I don’t know if a single GPU core elevates the chip to being “Pro” versus the base chip.
The difference is likely binning being turned into a marketing difference. Still, I ordered the 16 Pro Max. I had been a buying a pro version every other release but went with the 15 max last time. Wife needs a new phone so I will "upgrade her 12 Pro" to the 15 max and take advantage of the 0% interest via the Apple Card.
 
A17 Pro is faster than A18.

Instead of buying iPhone 16, you should go for iPhone 15 Pro and get 120Hz display and 1 more GPU core.
But thicker and heavier weight, less scratch-resistant screen glass, no camera button.
 
This sort of means that the iPhone 13 Pro's A15 chip was more of an "A15 Pro" compared to the iPhone 13's A15 chip, due to the lower GPU core counts.

However, this would have made the iPhone 14 seem weird for having that "A15 Pro" chip in a non-Pro iPhone. This would have also made the iPhone 14 Pro having a regular A16 chip vs. the iPhone 14's "A15 Pro" seem even weirder, so they decided to avoid having those names since back then.

This at least finally rights that wrong. Finally, a win for consistency.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.