And the thermals… my only complaint about the 15 pro max is that its thermals are not great.But thicker and heavier weight, less scratch-resistant screen glass, no camera button.
And the thermals… my only complaint about the 15 pro max is that its thermals are not great.But thicker and heavier weight, less scratch-resistant screen glass, no camera button.
Makes you wonder if they made MagSafe to attach to AC Vents on purpose…And the thermals… my only complaint about the 15 pro max is that its thermals are not great.
New 6‑core CPU with 2 performance and 4 efficiency cores
Maybe. Although I wonder what is the fractional area of just the GPU, that would lead a significant number of naturally binned chips. Although using a single production stream and disabling chips as needed could be cost effective. (Nothing wrong with that, it is commonplace)The difference is likely binning being turned into a marketing difference.
15%, which is claimed by Apple, not proven yet (at this point we don't know what exactly anything they claim means until tested, like their fake 2x telephoto optical zoom on base model that looked liked crap or claiming to have 10x optical zoom on Pro's spec sheet), is basically nothing.I’m sorry, what?!?!
It should be OK, the new iPhone has a completely redesigned plasma manifold.
I’m pretty sure it is 8GB.Any word on how much ram the A18 Pro would have?
I’d like to see 12gb, but I won’t be surprised if it’s 8gb just like the A17 Pro.
Good for a physical strength, but not so much for thermal dissipation. Aluminum is a much better thermal conductor than titanium. And there’s a CTE mismatch too, But probably not a big concern for typical iPhone operating temperatures.
Yes you’re right. 8gb confirmed for 16 Pro. This article confirms it, I must had missed this one from yesterday.I’m pretty sure it is 8GB.
I smoke two efficiency cores in the morning and I smoke two efficiency cores at night. I smoke two performance cores in the afternoon and everything feels alright.And two more efficiency cores as well.
- 6-core CPU with two performance cores and two efficiency cores.
At the end of the day, they both have to manage similar software tasks competently. There really can’t be a big difference between them which is obviously why Apple obfuscated any direct comparison. In a world without marketing and share prices the engineers would no doubt have just used the one chip across all the phones this year.So 1 GPU, promotion & AOD support, USB3. And some nebulous words About fast video encoding and bigger cache.
Lots of mixed comparisons (some compared to A16 and other to A17 pro) to hide direct comparisons between A18 and A18 Pro.
and developed new performance and efficiency cores first for iPhone, we can expect these large performance gains to come to M-series chips in the M5,
So 1 GPU, promotion & AOD support, USB3. And some nebulous words About fast video encoding and bigger cache.
Lots of mixed comparisons (some compared to A16 and other to A17 pro) to hide direct comparisons between A18 and A18 Pro.
You smoke too much! You know it’s bad for you right? 😄I smoke two efficiency cores in the morning and I smoke two efficiency cores at night. I smoke two performance cores in the afternoon and everything feels alright.
Lots of mixed comparisons (some compared to A16 and other to A17 pro) to hide direct comparisons between A18 and A18 Pro.
Yes. The Snapdragon gen 4 single core geekbench score is 5% lower than the A18 pro, but multicore is 20% higher.I think this could be the first time in a while that Snapdragon takes the lead in CPU performance since %15 is basically nothing and they were super close even using 4nm silicon.