Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'd like to see them go with a lesser or unknown actor. Jobs was such a known character and public figure that it would be odd to see a major actor playing him [not that it's uncommon with other movies].

And the screen writer is key. There's a lot of ways this story can go.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)

Wyle is a good actor and could be a good choice.

Clooney is a great actor and would be a horrible choice.

I question the premise that a movie needs to be or "will be made"... Jobs was very private and I think wouldn't want a moive made about _him_, maybe about Apple... but not about Jobs.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)

Wyle is a good actor and could be a good choice.

Clooney is a great actor and would be a horrible choice.

I question the premise that a movie needs to be or "will be made"... Jobs was very private and I think wouldn't want a moive made about _him_, maybe about Apple... but not about Jobs.

Thats a very good question. If the proposed movie is going to be based on the biography, it's has the potential to be a massive train wreck. Jobs was clearly brilliant, but also clearly mentally ill for most of his adult life. Do we really need a movie that excoriates the guy so soon after his death? A truckload if literary license will be needed if its going to fit the typical Hollywood formula of "Meet protagonist. Identify with protagonist, he's a nice guy and is everyone's best friend. Etc., etc., etc."

Saint Steve was not a nice guy, which is made abundantly clear in the biography. Those that worship at the altar are going to be tearing their hair out if the movie stays true to the book.
 
Last edited:
I would really hope that if there is a movie that it is done well, but with what I see coming out of Hollywood lately - I have some doubts.

I also agree that they should wait at least a little longer before they start thinking about doing a movie.

Regardless how it turns out, I am sure I will see it. Steve Jobs was an icon ever since I can remember, and whenever I see old footage of him - it definitely brings back memories of way back when....
 
that's too bad, Aaron Sorkin is so yesterday, not too mention over rated and a little bit of a druggie.

I think Steve would absolutely throw up if he knew this was even being considered. I'm actually surprised he did not maintain control of the film rights of the book.

Sadly someone will throw some piece of crap together and it will be less than accurate, and that's being generous, and who ever still actually goes to the movies will think its the truth.
 
Hopefully SONY will come to their senses and offer the job to someone who will understand the project and take it with the seriousness that it deserves.

Sorkin is absolutely the wrong choice. Yup, the Social Network was somewhat entertaining but it was on the whole a work of fiction. The screenplay was based on a FICTIONAL source with wildly misrepresented facts and distorted character portrayals.

THIS film should have a serious director/screenwriter with a track record of bringing non-fiction biographical epics to the big screen. Someone who is good at TV sitcoms, ripping off bad novels, making up dialogue that never took place is not the right candidate to adapt Isaacson's work.

A better selection would be someone like Oliver Stone (just as an example) who has done films about business (Wall Street) and has been doing biographical epics (Born on the 4th, The Doors, JFK, Nixon, Alexandar) for most of his career.

For those uncomfortable with Stone doing the screenplay, Warren Beatty is someone who has had experience writing and directing an award-winning biographical epic -- Reds. This film had to cover several decades in the main character's (John Reed) life and was ruthelessly attentive to the historical record as reported. The first 40 minutes or so of Reds uses the technique of having real friends and associates (most were elderly in 1981) tell their stories, and recall events about John Reed. This section of the film was called the "Witnesses".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reds_(film)

The standard for this film needs to be something higher than a made for TV movie. Done right, it will be a 4 hour epic that will leave the critics spellbound. Anything short of that will end up being a dismal failure.

FWIW, only unknown but talented actors can succeed here. No need to recruit Hollywood stars or reprise average performances from POSV. There are incredibly talented actors in theater all over the US who could do a far better job at playing the various periods of Job's life. The best way to ruin a project like this would be to have recognizable faces (known actors) play this role.
 
I still haven't seen Avatar due to being nothing more than a visual jizz fest. I won't be wasting 2 hours of my time watching any media glorified Steve Jobs movie either. We had Pirates of Silicon Valley, that was enough.
 
I still haven't seen Avatar due to being nothing more than a visual jizz fest. I won't be wasting 2 hours of my time watching any media glorified Steve Jobs movie either. We had Pirates of Silicon Valley, that was enough.

Avatar was more than special effects. If it did not have a strong pro-environmental message there would not be nearly as much animosity towards the film as there was in the time after its release. It also had an uphill battle against all the ignorance about it on the internet. Amazing how people that don't see a film just know everything that is wrong with it. Personally I think James Cameron is one of the best US filmmakers and Avatar was a hugely influential film, even if it attracts snark.

Anyway, I doubt anyone is aiming to make a movie about Steve Jobs to glorify the man. Walter Isaacson's book portrayed him warts and all so the film would follow suit. Jobs was a compelling figure of our times and the point of making a film about him is to make audiences understand him better. I doubt SONY has the agenda of gloryfying someone who was in many ways their competitor.
 
Ashton Kutcher? Really? He can't act. He has one character. A Dumbass Airhead. He does that really well, but that is about it.

I say let Noah do it again. I think he would pull it off.

Maybe let Kutcher play in the movie as the guy that played him in Pirates of Silicon Valley... :D

I can't see Clooney doing it. He looks nothing like him in my mind...

Maybe Bale, but think he needs to be more of a stick like Jobs was.


And whoever was saying let it rest... Theres money to be made and I am sure Steve would love to have a movie about his life.

I would love to see the Movie. I really like the book and to be able to get to see his crazy story on the big screen would be wonderful.

----------

I still haven't seen Avatar due to being nothing more than a visual jizz fest. I won't be wasting 2 hours of my time watching any media glorified Steve Jobs movie either. We had Pirates of Silicon Valley, that was enough.

Your statement and your signature is a clear indication of your feelings. Have you read the book? It definitely doesn't "glorify" Steve.


Avatar nothing more than a visual ... fest? Whatever... How would you know if you haven't seen it... :rolleyes:
 
Avatar nothing more than a visual ... fest? Whatever... How would you know if you haven't seen it... :rolleyes:

Most of us have seen it a long time ago, it was called 'Dances with Wolves' and a sequel named 'Pocahontas'

Nothing new except graphics, which I dont care for if a movie lacks substance.
 
The movie will be watched by the 25,000 Fanboys and that's it...so 99% sure it won't be a movie you spend $12 at a theater for.

Who wants to watch a movie about Steve Jobs?! Maybe a 2-hour Made For TV Special on Lifetime. And the actors and not-so-quite-factual-statements will be terrible as usual.

A 1-2 hour Biography special is probably the best bet for any kind of Jobs biography viewed on a tv.


i agree with you, but think the book probably sold to more than just apple fanboys.

Personally, I'd rather spend my money on the new xmas edition of the macbook air made entirely out of white chocolate and see how many fanboys defend THAT.
 
Most of us have seen it a long time ago, it was called 'Dances with Wolves' and a sequel named 'Pocahontas'

Nothing new except graphics, which I dont care for if a movie lacks substance.

How can you say it lacked substance if you haven't seen it? There is a lot of substance to it. Religion, Politics, Militarism, Capitalism, and Imperialism.

Your opinion... and I wouldn't use "Most" unless you actually have anything to back that up with...
 
Last edited:
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

Sandman1969 said:
Most of us have seen it a long time ago, it was called 'Dances with Wolves' and a sequel named 'Pocahontas'

Nothing new except graphics, which I dont care for if a movie lacks substance.

How can you say it lacked substance if you haven't seen it? There is a lot of substance to it. Religion, Politics, Militarism, Capitalism, and Imperialism.

Your opinion... and I wouldn't use "Most" unless you actually have anything to back that up with...

To me, Avatar touches on those subjects, but does so using broad clichés that don't make you think about those topics in any depth. I mean, of course you had to love the navi and hate the military. You were given no other choice.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)



To me, Avatar touches on those subjects, but does so using broad clichés that don't make you think about those topics in any depth. I mean, of course you had to love the navi and hate the military. You were given no other choice.

I will give you that. However I do think it made you think about a couple of the topics more than others. In particular faith.

Anyway, kind of off topic. I think a movie based on Steve jobs could be a very good movie. He did so many things.

If they can make a movie about Facebook what is wrong with one about Jobs?

I think his life is much more interesting.
 
Last edited:
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

"Done right, it will be a 4 hour epic that will leave the critics spellbound. Anything short of that will end up being a dismal failure."

Don't you think you're setting yourself up for disappointment?

As a side note, if the Eagles don't win the Super Bowl this year I'm quitting my job and moving to a country where 'football' means 'soccer'.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

"Done right, it will be a 4 hour epic that will leave the critics spellbound. Anything short of that will end up being a dismal failure."

Don't you think you're setting yourself up for disappointment?

As a side note, if the Eagles don't win the Super Bowl this year I'm quitting my job and moving to a country where 'football' means 'soccer'.

Lol. So which country are you thinking? Brazil? Somewhere in Europe? ;)
 
Great choice. Bale already has a similar, ******* temperament and also likes to scream at underlings for doing minor things which wouldn't bother regular people.

I agree but that would only be one half of Steve Jobs' persona. He was also very charming, compelling, seductive in a way... Bale would do the horrible boss part very well but his range is limited when it comes to being likeable in those ways.
 
You guys are completely missing the obvious choice...

This should be a PIXAR film. Seriously, who knew Steve better in the film making industry than John Lassiter. They could do an animation/live-action hybrid film. It would be brilliantly written and an almost guaranteed hit. Brilliant.
 
Maybe it should be titled: Steve Jobs, It Takes a Thief.

steve-jobs-vs-dennis-ritchie-confusion-30902-1318678918-8.jpeg
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.