Let me put it this way : WTF?
You are a 22yr old dude, who shoots with a 30.000$ Hasselblad,who cant afford a 250$ PS CS3 update for PS, who just sold his MBP to buy a old tech computer to run his CS2?
You got to be ******** me?
First.
If you work in/for a pre-press,why dont you use
their computers for all the work? I bet they are well equipped, I mean,they have to for chrissake?!
Second.
The hasselblad is not yours. It can´t be. If it isnt yours,you propably loan it once in a while to shoot your own stuff?
-Can´t you work on your own stuff with the firms computers?
If you cant, then you will get by with a MBP and CS2 just fine. PS CS2 runs just fine on intells too,if you keep the pics under 500MB.
Thirded.
nope, megapixels although now that I checked it was 31 mp not 35...they where from a Hassey digital back...big tiffs the raw files are only like 25-30mb though, they must be compressed.
Wtf? You convert a 31mp image to a 16 bit tiff and it would be around 150MB.
Only way they would be under 100MB would be if they would be 8bit pics. Wich would be utterly dumb. It would be like using champagne to wash your porch. Or dumber.
And the stuff that they must be compressed,you must be ******** me?
What on earth are you talking about?
So. Forgive me but I have a feeling you are ******** us and taking us for a ride. Your stuff just dont make
any sense at all. It´s like münchausen-esque.
If not,I do sincerely apologise.
In that case,still dont buy a G5.
Buy that MBP back and get the bloody PS CS3 update!
Get a external fw400/800 disk for scratch disk and load the computer with max memory. Sorted. A lot of photogs work with that kind of setup, and not only in field but in studio as well.
If it´s ok for them, I am sure as hell it is ok for you too.
Waiting for a 8 core harpers is useless anyway if you work only with CS3.
The threading in CS3 utterly sucks. Yes it is better than CS2,but the way photoshop is coded,it just dont thread well.
Normal load is around 100-120% (with a 4 core MP) and you can very occasionally se peaks around 250%. I think I never have seen them over 300%.
Why would you wait to buy a 8 core mac when you would end up not using 5 of them most of the time?
Ok,some smart ass is gonna say that Multitasking is the shitznitz.
I say bollocks.
You have your workflow.
1.Import photos to disk:Takes your time even if you have a FW card reader. Uses about 2% of your processor.
2.Import them to LR/Aperture. A 8GB shoot will take about 2-3 mins to get previews. Your procs are around 200-300% that time. In that 2 mins you import a bit more photos form you memory cards.
3.Sort/Edit your pics in LR/Aperture: Your procs run at about 20-250% for that time.
4.Export pics: LR runs at about 200% when doing a 100 pic batch of 72MB TIFFs.It takes 2-3 mins. Meanwhile you can import a bit more pics into LR. And you can read your mails.
5.Then you are sorted for photoshopping.
Video stuff is a different thing,obviously, but in the photo world you will be just fine for the next 18 months with your MBP or MP.
Why 18 months?
Well, photoshop CS4 should come out by then, and if Adobe has
totallyrevamped their code, we
might get a bit more multicore aware product.
Might.
End of rant.
And no offense.
I just run out of coffee.