Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Abazigal

Contributor
Original poster
Jul 18, 2011
20,474
24,090
Singapore
There is no doubt that actionable notifications have made interacting with my phone more convenient. I can now respond to my friend's iMessage directly from the lock screen, rather than unlocking my phone.

However, this also poses a security hazard. What's stopping someone from accessing your phone's lockscreen notifications in your absence and replying with nonsensical messages, or worse, delete notifications and emails?

The obvious answer here is "Disable this feature then", but then, this seems like a very "Un-apple-like" solution, and obviously a step back. Apple has always prided itself on giving us the best of both worlds. Features like Touch-ID showed us that we can have our cake and eat it too. I should be able to enjoy the convenience of responding to lockscreen notifications and not having to worry about security.

This didn't strike me until I was playing around with the Cloudmagic email app yesterday. When I swiped to delete a junk email from my iPhone's lock screen, I was prompted to authenticate with Touch-ID or my passcode. I just needed to do it once to interact with all my emails; locking the phone resets this.
b91bbbdda1b78ea62bd2afe2d0cfa09c.jpg

891206a579b2b045885f50d6b39f1766.jpg

With Touch-ID, this process was both quick and seamless. It seemed so obvious. What do you think? Should iOS 9 allow us to use Touch-ID to limit access to who can act on our notifications? Moving forward, only the iphone5 won't have Touch-ID anyways.

Edit: I uploaded the images via tapatalk and the ability to resize photos is noticeably missing. Anyone knows how to resize them? Thanks, and sorry if you had to scroll through very gigantic images. :p
 
I don't get the point of your post really.

Right now when I try to act on a notification on my lock screen it ask me to unlock using code or touch-id.

And you seem aware of it.

And you ask if Apple should keep this behavior in iOS 9 ?
 
I don't get the point of your post really.

Right now when I try to act on a notification on my lock screen it ask me to unlock using code or touch-id.

And you seem aware of it.

And you ask if Apple should keep this behavior in iOS 9 ?

You can reply to messages without the need for Touch ID right now.
 
Actionable notifications and Touch-ID

That's pretty much how it works now. It's up to app developers to choose whether they want to require authentication when performing actions from the lock screen. I'm not sure what would change.

EDIT: I suppose you could make it a per-app security setting controlled by the system, as opposed to something each developer has to choose to implement.
 
Last edited:
you can disable it

How will I quick reply if I disable it? This doesn't bother me personally. But a solution would be that after you press send you'll have to input a passcode or your thumb for it to send. If you input the wrong password the message will still be unread on your lock screen.
 
What???? I own an iphone 5 with the latest ios and I never knew that I could reply or delete emails from the lock screen?? Do I slide "left" instead of right time get those options?

Is there any options I need to enable for this??
 
What???? I own an iphone 5 with the latest ios and I never knew that I could reply or delete emails from the lock screen?? Do I slide "left" instead of right time get those options?

Is there any options I need to enable for this??

Yes, slide from right to left.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.