You don't password protect folders. You should use Permissions to stop unauthorized access.
You don't password protect folders. You should use Permissions to stop unauthorized access.
Otherwise encrypt it.
How exactly do you set the permissions so it works that way? Pardon the ignorance hehe...
Apimac Secret Folder is a program that provides an easy and fast way to protect personal documents and avoid them being seen, modified, or erased by other users. It allows users to hide multiple folders and their contents. Files and folders can be added by means of a single click on a choose dialog box or via drag and drop.
The application is really simple to use and can be protected with a password for extra security.
Using a password: The 'Require Password' check button lets you protect the application with a password. If this option is selected, at the opening of Apimac Secret Folder a password dialog box will be displayed. To gain access to the application it will be necessary to enter the correct password.
In the "Get Info" window for said folder, expand the "Ownership and Permissions" section, then the "Details" section under that. You should be able to set Owner to yourself with read and write permission, and then "no access" to Group and others. Then click the "Apply to enclosed items" button. After that, you should be the only one allowed in. If anyone else tries to open it, they should either be presented with an "Access denied" message, or a request for an administrator's password (or yours.)
This is also possible from the Terminal, with the chmod and chown commands being a little more direct, but the Get Info method would probably be the easiest.
Unfortunately, it does nothing to protect the contents if you walk away leaving your account logged in, and it does nothing to protect you if someone steals your laptop and uses one of a few various tricks to get root access.Thanks, very useful trick.
you could always use Apimac Secret Folder
How exactly do you set the permissions so it works that way? Pardon the ignorance hehe...
Notes about security: this program uses the standard functionality of the operating system to make folders and files invisible. Programmers and experienced users could gain access to a folder made invisible.
Also please be warned that there are some applications that let you open invisible files or files contained in a folder made invisible. Whether you need advanced levels for protecting your data, there are other ways as protecting information on removable media or using Mac OS X FileVault. To learn more about Protecting information on removable media and on Mac OS X FileVault open Mac OS X Finder's Help.
Maybe the OP is not asking about how to password protect a folder because he's afraid of getting robbed or because he needs to store his bank account login.
Maybe he just wants a simple way to keep certain folders away from visitors (friends, family, etc) who probably don't know anything about root, unix, terminal, etc... and if that's the case then such a simple app that adds a dot to a folder name is quite enough.
I use HideFolders, I don't care if it's good or badly programmed, I click it and it works for the 2 hours I usually need it.
*Snip*
No wonder Mac users are the laughingstock of windows users everywhere.
There is no real folder locking that works, IMO. Your simplest bet is to do this:
This is true too. If the permissions are set right no one will ever get in. In both cases other users will see there's something there they can't touch but that's about it -- otherwise you're fully protected.You don't password protect folders. You should use Permissions to stop unauthorized access.
Otherwise encrypt it.
Hopefully one would set the permissions... correctly? 😀 And Finder can ask all it wants but if the other users aren't admins they won't get in.Which, depending on how you set the permissions for the folder, will result in the Finder conveniently asking you for an administrator password when the folder is accessed.
Yes and a HDD where the folder and its contents reside could be corrupted too and then if you didn't have the sparse image you'd be toast. It goes both ways.Also, a downside with encrypted/passworded disk images is that if part of the image becomes corrupted in some way, all the files inside are most likely toast. Not very likely, but entirely possible (have seen it happen before...)
Keytachi you're dupe of the day. 😛you could always use Apimac Secret Folder
I haven't checked but I thought it used the Finder visible flag?The "hide" function that Secret folder does, is that it puts a period in front of the file so that FINDER AND ONLY FINDER ignores it! UNIX still knows where it is, it isn't like finder.
He seems upset but you're the elitist one here. You say "a majority of Mac users" when it's only one or two at this forum and you have no clue what the real majority is like. And it's no longer as you graybeards have had it and that's for sure.SC68Cal, stop picking your zits and ditch the elitist attitude - you just don't get it! A majority of Mac users don't understand (or care to) how UNIX permissions work
This is true too.If you're worried about friends and family using your computer, create a guest account for them with a password! Then you don't have to worry about them accessing anything that is yours! UNIX principles here people. Even Windows doesn't screw it up too badly.
I read it as being more of a "don't-waste-your-time-and-money-on-this-retarded-app" rant...Excuse me? When did this thread go off-road to the point where you're insulting people because they have different computing habits then yours?
Which if you note has already been mentioned - Finder.Have you ever tried to think that people are actually different from one another and that some prefer it the "easy way"?
On my side of things, I have quicksilver, visor and terminal always open because it is faster and simpler to use the cli a lot of the time. So what's the point of doing extra work? 😀If I can do this with one click of the mouse button, why on earth would I open terminal to do this?
Apple's pursuing unix certification for Leopard. Sooo...technically...Seriously, I've seen a bunch of your posts and you have OCD in what regards computer usage, you should go back to DOS or basic UNIX and leave OSX for the "lesser beings".
Yes it does 🙂And BTW, QUICKSILVER RULES! ...
Barring physical access (as mentioned previously).This is true too. If the permissions are set right no one will ever get in. In both cases other users will see there's something there they can't touch but that's about it -- otherwise you're fully protected.