You’re not their target customer. That’s ok, and more importantly, nobody cares.Until they fix their scamming price subscription model, Adobe should Premiere a launch out of the market.
Let me use your professional labor for free as much as I like then.Some folks don’t like being able to use professional tools for free anymore. ;0)
Our company makes pro apps and we are regularly getting feedback and making improvements, new features, and squeezing extra power whenever apple drops new chips and improvements. That costs money, every single month. Support alone is a big expense. Subscription model makes sense for professional software in professional environments.Until they fix their scamming price subscription model, Adobe should Premiere a launch out of the market.
DxO PhotoLab 9 has pretty much nailed LR. There’s really no reason to be extorted each month by Adobe anymore.(Except Lightroom, that one's good IMHO)
Weird concept. Pirates are actually the group that couldn’t care less about the pricing model changing, as they do not pay, either way.Some folks don’t like being able to use professional tools for free anymore. ;0)
Are you suggesting that software packages like DxO PhotoLab, Affinity Photo or Final Cut Pro or lots of other software aren't for professionals? Gee, how on Earth do those people make a living!!!man this get so tiring. Adobe is professional software primarily for people making a living creating media. It’s DEAD CHEAP if you are a working professional. I do my first photo job in a month and a tiny portion of what I get paid for a 2 hour job pays for my entire month of Creative Cloud.
There’s many free or one time purchase alternatives if you aren’t a working professional.
That’s what support contracts are for. Of course a company likes to have a steady stream of income; the company often likes the customer having to keep paying them much more than the customer likes to have to keep paying to use their software.Our company makes pro apps and we are regularly getting feedback and making improvements, new features, and squeezing extra power whenever apple drops new chips and improvements. That costs money, every single month. Support alone is a big expense. Subscription model makes sense for professional software in professional environments.
iMovie is such an old-timer it can only make horizontal/landscape videos.
It’s DEAD CHEAP if you are a working professional.
While I am all for the concept of ownership versus renting, you got your math wrong, as you divided the one time price of your NLE (FCPX, I assume) by total months to compare against the Premiere Pro monthly price but then used that single month price to compare against the cumulative price of PP (and also chose the highest possible subscription pricing).Yeah, you keep telling yourself that. You'll have paid anywhere between $3,400 to $7,800 to date – assuming you fell for it on day one – depending on your subscription, and that cost will obviously keep going UP!
I on the other hand have paid a whopping $1.75/month for my NLE since its inception, and because it was a ONE TIME purchase (lifetime license!) that cost will continue to go DOWN.
Guess what means? I've made $7.798,25 more than you in the same time frame. Even if I had never made a dime off my work. Guess which I prefer?
Thanks for the tip. I’ll have to check that out.DxO PhotoLab 9 has pretty much nailed LR. There’s really no reason to be extorted each month by Adobe anymore.
Good. iMovie (which I paid for, btw, before it was made free) is practically useless.