Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Ahh, the good old days when people were incredibly b*tching about not having Flash on iPhones and iPads... Fun times :p
 
Good news, login to Netflix, Account -> Playback Settings, you'll notice a new option "Prefer HTML5 Player instead of Silverlight" :D

Thanks! I'll check this out.
I heard about it but I remember something about it being Windows 8.1 only, unless that's something else.
 
I'll have to update our labs at work, which need Flash. (And heck, I just updated Flash a couple weeks ago!) But at home, I have a clean install on my new Mac and have decided to abandon Adobe. I gave up Photoshop for Pixelmator and am creating multimedia with Hype instead of Flash. There are a few sites that treat my computer as a mobile device because there's no Flash player. And there are a few others that pester me to install Flash. Outside of that, the lack of Flash hasn't bothered me at all.
 
In other news - a company is responding to an issue with their software to plug a security vulnerability. But yet, some MacRumors posters find a reason to make this a bad thing.

Could it be this software has more holes than Swiss cheese?
 
Adobe has released a "critical update" for its Adobe Flash Player software on both Mac and Windows, addressing a zero-day vulnerability that gives complete control over compromised systems to hackers.

What does zero-day vulnerability mean in this context? Is it just a normal vulnerability with some extra words added because it sounds pro (or because it pays more)?
 
What does zero-day vulnerability mean in this context? Is it just a normal vulnerability with some extra words added because it sounds pro (or because it pays more)?

Given the fact that the update is exactly one build number higher than the old? I think there was a vulnerability found and they quickly patched it. As in, there was a vulnerability found eight after they patched and it was considered important enough to rush a fix.
 
What does zero-day vulnerability mean in this context? Is it just a normal vulnerability with some extra words added because it sounds pro (or because it pays more)?

A zero-day vulnerability is one with an exploit in the wild before the vulnerability can be identified/mitigated by the application's development team. An exploit is actively being used and none of the affected computers have a fix in place.
 
Because they didn't just try, they shut it out of their platform long before the alternative was ready. Of course, there are still some things that there isn't anything better than flash for, but we should ignore that.

----------



He predicted that Adobe would continue to try to make their software better? Woe is them, they're doing the responsible thing. They should just plug their ears and pretend that vulnerabilities don't exist. That's the right thing to do, right?

I would argue that they're not making their product better (Adobe that is), but simply trying to keep the same product, plugging the security holes as others find them. That is not very comforting as far as I'm concerned. Nor is it moving forward - something that Adobe seems to have issues with.
 
I would argue that they're not making their product better (Adobe that is), but simply trying to keep the same product, plugging the security holes as others find them. That is not very comforting as far as I'm concerned. Nor is it moving forward - something that Adobe seems to have issues with.

Then you'd be arguing an incorrect point. They have been improving Flash. To not see it is to not be looking at the huge improvements. Even the OS X version is better than it was when I first got my MBA.
 
A zero-day vulnerability is one with an exploit in the wild before the vulnerability can be identified/mitigated by the application's development team. An exploit is actively being used and none of the affected computers have a fix in place.

Ok, thanks. I'm aware a zero-day exploit, exploits a vulnerability that becomes known in that context as a zero-day vulnerability. But I didn't realise that the vulnerability remained 'zero-day' once the vendor found out about it. Fixing a zero-day vulnerability sounds like an oxymoron, but if you're correct then I guess not.
 
Why does Adobe insist on naming the file install_flash_player_osx.dmg?

Why can't they append the version number to it?


Because you're not actually downloading that version of a Flash Player installer. It's Adobe, so you're downloading a Flash Player installer downloader, which then downloads the latest version from Adobe's site and launches that installer. I think this is actually a pretty recent change, but as an SCCM admin, I deal with it a lot more at work (where we have the enterprise installers, which are "real" installers) than at home, so I might just have a skewed memory.

In any case, consider yourself lucky that it's just an installer downloader and not an Download Helper Updater update you have to run so you can update Download Helper, thus enabling you to download the plugin. :) (Or whatever crazy shenanigans Adobe is known for.)

PS - Mine was called AdobeFlashPlayerInstaller_12_ltrosxd_aaa_aih.dmg.
 
Don't mind the update, software patches are expected.

What I do mind however is that stupid box in the Flash settings that says "Allow Adobe to install updates". MAKE THAT FREAKING WORK SO I DON'T HAVE TO BE BOTHERED EVERY 2.3 DAYS ABOUT ANOTHER UPDATE!!

Thank you.
 
Don't mind the update, software patches are expected.

What I do mind however is that stupid box in the Flash settings that says "Allow Adobe to install updates". MAKE THAT FREAKING WORK SO I DON'T HAVE TO BE BOTHERED EVERY 2.3 DAYS ABOUT ANOTHER UPDATE!!

Thank you.
If you give it time it'll work, it just usually doesn't happen the instance an update is released, could be hours or a day or two until it does its thing, as is often the case with automatic update type of things for majority of software.
 
Because you're not actually downloading that version of a Flash Player installer. It's Adobe, so you're downloading a Flash Player installer downloader, which then downloads the latest version from Adobe's site and launches that installer. I think this is actually a pretty recent change, but as an SCCM admin, I deal with it a lot more at work (where we have the enterprise installers, which are "real" installers) than at home, so I might just have a skewed memory.

In any case, consider yourself lucky that it's just an installer downloader and not an Download Helper Updater update you have to run so you can update Download Helper, thus enabling you to download the plugin. :) (Or whatever crazy shenanigans Adobe is known for.)

all_adobe_updates.png
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.