(A) Should I complain that the computer is super sensitive to liquid?
(B) Should I admit right up front that the problem was caused by water damage? I suppose its possible its from something else. But I assume they'll suspect liquid if only from seeing the indicator.
(C) Should I admit up front that I already saw a technician on the issue and he observed liquid, or should I not bring that up?
(D) Should I avoid blaming the product for being sensitive?
(E) And if they insist on charging, should I take it to a different Apple store?
They dissected it, observed liquid, and stated it would be a $1200 repair (new logic board)
"They may well know it to - it may already be noted against your serial number, to prevent Apple being scammed like this"
I don't know for sure what caused the malfunction.
They dissected it, observed liquid, and stated it would be a $1200 repair (new logic board)
But they do.
A genuine 'thank you' simonsi for the insurance tip.
But I don't see how the fact that they observed liquid guarantees that liquid caused the problem. It still seems fair to point out the actual possibility that it could have been a defect.
Absolutely no idea why 2 separate replies have assumed I would be dishonest with the Genius.
I am not certain of what caused the malfunction and neither are they
There is nothing wrong with acting in a way that minimizes the odds of them refusing to repair a defective product (I can't know for sure if it was damaged or defective).
At twenty days old, and being honest, I can't see any outcome except a replacement.
Thanks. You make a good point that it's being new probably minimizes the odds of defect.
Umm, electronics follow a "bathtub curve", so the chance of failure due to a defect is higher during the early-life period, then follows a flat-line, then rises at some point towards the end of life.
Non of that applies with damage or contamination though.