josh.thomas said:The .17Ghz isn't really that noticeable I've found.
Rosetta uses a lot of RAM, and Macs love RAM anyway - 512 wouldn't be enough to run Photoshop and do 50+MB files if it was running nativley (ie: on a PowerPC Mac).
The fact Photoshop loves RAM, the Mac does, and Rosetta does, means 512 wouldn't be enough.
A 1.83Ghz with 2GB of RAM will run fine. Remember, I'm going from a G5 to an Intel, not a G4 - which is slower, in comparison.
Also, just because CS3 will be Intel compatible doesn't mean my computer will gain .34Ghz. It would still be a 1.83Ghz/2Ghz machine - its just CS3 would be running nativley, and would be smoother, and less of a RAM hog as it wouldn't be using Rosetta (so it would run faster) but the computers speed itself does not alter.
I ealize this, but i will say that i had my macbook, 2 ghz and with photoshp cs it took about 20 seconds to open and kept up with everything i did, now with 1 gig it takes about 15 to open. if you want me to test anything thing i will, but i can only test with a gig. and according to what i have read cs3 will have much better support for dual cores so you will notice a slihht difference. Id get the 2 ghz, and slowly up that ram to 2 gig and than when cs3 comes out itss fly. You cant upgrade the macbooks cpu since it is saudered on, the 2 ghz will prepare you a little more. but, that 1.83 sure is nice, and if you dont need a dvd burner its hard to justify the cost difference. I dont worl with 50 mb files though i work with about 10 mb.