gregorsamsa
macrumors 6502a
Unfortunately that one aspect limits the usefulness of its gpu for certain purposes. I think Apple bet on the Haswell igpu as being good enough for most users who buy the mini. They probably determined the HD 4000 was acceptable. They did move to a somewhat more expensive cpu in the mid range model. With good cord management, I could see someone having a setup for the mini at their home and office. If you only have to transport the brain, it wouldn't be that bad. You just plug in a couple things, and you have a more ergonomic setup than a notebook could provide.
I agree. Also, GPU benchmarks prove that going with integrated video in the high-end 2012 Mini was a backward step for graphically-demanding tasks. Frankly, notwithstanding the impressive quad-core update in the more expensive 2012 model, I'm glad I have the 2011 Mini with HD 6630M.
However, there really isn't that much difference in most of those benchmarks. For those who prefer a faster processor, I imagine the loss of the discrete card won't bother them nearly as much as it did someone like me.
That probably no-one else in the industry, bar Apple, would get away with it, is yet another issue & nothing new when talking about Apple's general business plan of trying to get more people into buying more expensive products, in this case iMacs. 🙄
FWIW, unlike many consumers, I'll never buy into that agenda (not least as I can't stand any AIO's with reflective screens), but I strongly suspect I'm in the minority in this respect.