Developers need to eat. You can help feed them by paying for products and services.
So, you can feed them! Likewise I have to eat, and if I had to choose to eat or pay for my diary entry, my to-do list, to edit an image, and about 15 other things that went subscription, I'd have trouble eating just like the devs.
I have no problem paying subscriptions for SERVICES. Most subs are NOT services. Subs for a to-do list? Subs for a diary? Subs for email? Either write software that does something more substantial to charge for more, or price your software accordingly for sale. I refuse to go broke by a thousand subs. If I added up all software I dropped due to subs, It's something like $150/mo. Um, sanity check! That's not even looking at media streaming services, which can add another $100+ to your bill. I choose NO.
I just dropped DropBox after their latest price hike. I have always overpaid for DB because of the great service, but now it's too much to overpay for what I need.
So please give the dev $5 on my behalf. Thank you.
[doublepost=1563280450][/doublepost]
Over the years I learned the hard way to use built in apps as much as possible. Works for me. App subscriptions are bad. I can understand some serious software if you depend on it to make a living, but when you start adding all the Twitters, email clients, translation apps etc., your budget blows up.
This. If my friends at Panic software subbed Coda (or the product that is replacing Coda) or Transmit, guess what, I'd have to pay. But yeah, I use that software so I can put money in *my* pocket, more so than the devs pocket. I'll still fight till the end, but I'd have to submit, or move to Windows... which I'm not ready to do that.
Hell, even MS lets you buy Office for a one-time fee and doesn't force you into a sub. And as much as I hate Adobe for starting all this sub business.. at least the software they are subbing actually has real value. An email client? A to-do list? A diary? WTF?!?