What?Who is going diving with these? Also did you miss the part where APP3 have shorter battery life than APP2?
This is the one thing that’s putting me off replacing my aging AirPod pro 1’s, and I wish Apple would face more scrutiny for this.
I just can’t justify spending £220 every 4 years or so on headphones, not only is it a colossal waste of money but so bad for the envirnoment
Waiting for AirPod max 2’s, since at least with them you can repair yourself
For those of worried about filling landfills remember....50 square miles can handle all the trash in the US for the next 1000 years and many modern landfills are covered and become parks. We won't run out of landfills.For those of you worried about filling landfills, you can recycle your Apple devices at Apple Stores.
![]()
Recycling
We’ll help you recycle your device. It’s free, easy, and good for the planet.www.apple.com
When the stems were longer, it would’ve been convenient to have removable stems with built in batteries but usually after three years audio quality is deteriorating anyway![]()
This is cost engineering disguised as innovation. Removing magnets and reducing battery capacity directly improves Apple’s margins while the retail price stays unchanged, or even increases. The aluminum chassis shift of the iPhone 17 Pro follows the same pattern: Apple frames it as a thermal performance upgrade, but aluminum is significantly cheaper to manufacture than previous materials. They’re systematically finding ways to reduce production costs while keeping prices high, then marketing these changes as consumer benefits.Yeah, the reduced case battery capacity bothers me a lot. They made the case noticeably bigger than APP2. And apparently they even removed some magnets according to this article. But they gave the case less battery capacity. It makes no sense to me. I could go 5, sometimes even 6 days without recharging my APP2 case, but it's every 3 days with APP3.
That’s even more money, I don’t use them often so AppleCare will have expired by the time I need to use itBuy the pro 3s with an AppleCare plan and once the battery degrades you can get them replaced for free more than once I think
Pretty sure lithium batteries are worse for the environment, just saying.People throw out 18 gazillion water bottles a day, but those AirPods! How dare Apple not let eco-hippies go to their workbench and change all the parts! What about mother nature! They should weave their old AirPods into their macrame.
I am trying to be better at turning them in for recycling. So far Best Buy has been a good place to drop stuff off. Whether they actually do anything, no idea. Apple stuff I will give to Apple for recycling.I'm curious how many people actually throw electronics away. Don't they just end up in a junk drawer?
Who just throws away perfectly working cables? I gave all of mine away to people who were thrilled to get them. There are millions of people who atill use lightning-charged iPhones and iPads.Yeah. Because tens of millions of lightning cables being thrown in the landfill wasn’t enough.
I donated mine to a local college that my wife worked at. However I believe I7guy is right - bet we are the exception to the norm, sadly.Who just throws away perfectly working cables? I gave all of mine away to people who were thrilled to get them. There are millions of people who atill use lightning-charged iPhones and iPads.
Thankfully, we can get a discount at third party retailers. Waiting for the Black Friday sale at $199.80%. BOM is $51. The margin has probably improved now due to even higher economies of scale. It's a really outstanding source of recurring revenue for Apple.
They even give you new ones for free since they can’t repair or check anythingVery much expected this outcome. Airpods are basically consumable devices and once the battery runs out it's time for the next set.
If we follow that logic that the “eco-friendly” choice is to stick with wired headphones then why is Apple, the company that never misses a chance to remind us how much it cares about Mother Nature, flooding the market with sealed wireless earbuds that are destined for e-waste after a couple of years?My Sony mirrorless camera takes a removable battery, yet that battery is sealed in a plastic enclosure with electrical contacts and onboard electronics. I look at the AirPods just the same: sealed in a plastic enclosure with electrical contacts and onboard electronics. The AirPods themselves are the replaceable batteries. In the end, it's splitting hairs...
If you are concerned about the environmental impact of AirPods, go with wired headphones. No battery to wear out, but now you're back to managing a wire and plug (and the eventual deterioration of the wire/plug).
When you hand your old AirPods into Apple, I would hope they at least go to an e-waste reclamation partner that shreds them and recovers some of the raw materials. Would be interesting to know for sure.
The worst thing for e-waste is to have it sitting in a drawer. Send it in for recycling. Apple will even pay for shipping on all sorts of stuff, so there must be some value in it for them. They've even taken old Android phones off my hands.
Usually things like this get shredded and the component materials separated out by mechanical or chemical processes. They can float off the plastics in water and use magnets to recover the driver magnets. Sometimes they will go through several facilities that specialise in recovering a particular material.I'd like to see how e-waste companies recycle these. Do they just crush them and then somehow sort out the salvegable materials? Or are they even recyclable?
RnD, paychecks, higher quality materials than in usual $20 buds.Has anyone ever guessed at the margin Apple has on these? I find it hard to imagine that they even cost Apple $20, but they charge over $200.