Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Who is going diving with these? Also did you miss the part where APP3 have shorter battery life than APP2?
What?
1759349560025.png


Or you talking case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ntombi and noraa
This is the one thing that’s putting me off replacing my aging AirPod pro 1’s, and I wish Apple would face more scrutiny for this.

I just can’t justify spending £220 every 4 years or so on headphones, not only is it a colossal waste of money but so bad for the envirnoment

Waiting for AirPod max 2’s, since at least with them you can repair yourself

Buy the pro 3s with an AppleCare plan and once the battery degrades you can get them replaced for free more than once I think
 
For those of you worried about filling landfills, you can recycle your Apple devices at Apple Stores.
For those of worried about filling landfills remember....50 square miles can handle all the trash in the US for the next 1000 years and many modern landfills are covered and become parks. We won't run out of landfills.
 
When the stems were longer, it would’ve been convenient to have removable stems with built in batteries but usually after three years audio quality is deteriorating anyway :rolleyes:

I've also wondered if a design more akin to AP1 could be crafted so the battery is in the long stem and possibly replaceable.

Related .. seems like someone is able to design repairable earbuds.

The Fairbuds get a 10/10 ifixit score.


I'm sure Apple could make an even better design that is still repairable, if they actually wanted to.
 
Yeah, the reduced case battery capacity bothers me a lot. They made the case noticeably bigger than APP2. And apparently they even removed some magnets according to this article. But they gave the case less battery capacity. It makes no sense to me. I could go 5, sometimes even 6 days without recharging my APP2 case, but it's every 3 days with APP3.
This is cost engineering disguised as innovation. Removing magnets and reducing battery capacity directly improves Apple’s margins while the retail price stays unchanged, or even increases. The aluminum chassis shift of the iPhone 17 Pro follows the same pattern: Apple frames it as a thermal performance upgrade, but aluminum is significantly cheaper to manufacture than previous materials. They’re systematically finding ways to reduce production costs while keeping prices high, then marketing these changes as consumer benefits.
 
People throw out 18 gazillion water bottles a day, but those AirPods! How dare Apple not let eco-hippies go to their workbench and change all the parts! What about mother nature! They should weave their old AirPods into their macrame.
Pretty sure lithium batteries are worse for the environment, just saying.
 
I still don’t understand why you can’t unscrew the metal end and swap out the battery. AirPods as they are currently designed are still horribly disposable.

Mother Earth would be very pleased
 
I find the premise of this video to be overly simplistic. Good design isn't about solutions so much as tradeoffs. The AirPods can't be repaired, but they are designed to be ultra reliable in the first instance and there isn't much inside that will ever need repair. They are sealed up tight such that they can't be opened, but that also means that they won't get instantly nuked when they fall out of your ears and into a puddle or toilet. Would it be better if they were less well sealed and more repairable? I've dropped my AirPods in water and they survived, but I've been using my AirPods2 for years without any failures . . . so I would say that this was the better design choice. Eventually the battery will die, and they will become trash but by then most consumers will want to upgrade anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ntombi
i don't think any regular person is going to bother repairing these things, let alone try to disassemble them. maybe 0.05% or less actually would.

it makes as much sense as washing and reusing a single ply toilet paper.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: KENESS
Who just throws away perfectly working cables? I gave all of mine away to people who were thrilled to get them. There are millions of people who atill use lightning-charged iPhones and iPads.
I donated mine to a local college that my wife worked at. However I believe I7guy is right - bet we are the exception to the norm, sadly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ntombi and I7guy
My Sony mirrorless camera takes a removable battery, yet that battery is sealed in a plastic enclosure with electrical contacts and onboard electronics. I look at the AirPods just the same: sealed in a plastic enclosure with electrical contacts and onboard electronics. The AirPods themselves are the replaceable batteries. In the end, it's splitting hairs...

If you are concerned about the environmental impact of AirPods, go with wired headphones. No battery to wear out, but now you're back to managing a wire and plug (and the eventual deterioration of the wire/plug).

When you hand your old AirPods into Apple, I would hope they at least go to an e-waste reclamation partner that shreds them and recovers some of the raw materials. Would be interesting to know for sure.

The worst thing for e-waste is to have it sitting in a drawer. Send it in for recycling. Apple will even pay for shipping on all sorts of stuff, so there must be some value in it for them. They've even taken old Android phones off my hands.
If we follow that logic that the “eco-friendly” choice is to stick with wired headphones then why is Apple, the company that never misses a chance to remind us how much it cares about Mother Nature, flooding the market with sealed wireless earbuds that are destined for e-waste after a couple of years?

They’ve built entire campaigns around Apple + the planet, with the Earth literally cast as a character praising Apple for being responsible. If the concern is truly the environmental impact, and if wired is supposed to be the greener solution, shouldn’t Apple simply stop selling AirPods altogether?
 
Good to see the teardown. Not surprised with the score. These devices are just simply use and throw whenever they become bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
I'd like to see how e-waste companies recycle these. Do they just crush them and then somehow sort out the salvegable materials? Or are they even recyclable?
Usually things like this get shredded and the component materials separated out by mechanical or chemical processes. They can float off the plastics in water and use magnets to recover the driver magnets. Sometimes they will go through several facilities that specialise in recovering a particular material.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.