I know what you guys are thinking before I start - another Buckwheat rant. But hey, this one may have some teeth.
Why would I want the new Airport-N? Apple just forgot all the other stuff in the router that pertains to IP, routing and ethernet. It makes the unit no better than the old Extreme.
If I connect at 5.4ghz, my Network Utility says I'm at 300bps. THATS fast for wireless. But so what? I get to the router quicker with N, but the entire router is wrapped around 100-bps [not giga-bit] ethernet!
Apple also made the unit unusable with your non-10.0.x network if you're using a Cable/DSL modem. I'll give the Apple IP guys a 2 on that one.
Well wait a minute - maybe I can use this N stuff for the hard drive. Makes sense. So I connected the USB drive first to the Macbook Pro and did some throughput tests. Very fast indeed actually. About 200mB/sec (that's Bytes not bits).
So I connected the same drive to the Airport-N. After the usual permissions snafu that Apple hasn't dealt with, I did the same testing. About 30mB/sec via the fastest N connection available. And the computer sits right next to the Extreme-N.
So Ok the HDD is a bust, well what about Cable/DSL? Whoooosh - it's off to the router at 300bps, then another slam on the brakes to 1/3 the speed for the Ethernet-Router connection. Then of course Cable is running about 5mbp/s anyway. Oh well, no gain there.
Well wait a minute I'm told by a die-hard Apple fan. "What about your LAN"? he asks. Ok, I'll take a Linksys "G" router ($39.95) and we'll see. Copied files to/from a Sun array, and I'm getting the usual 30-40mBp/s. "Now" said my friend "Now I'll show you what N can really do".
He hooked up the Airport-N to the LAN, and we did the same test. Sure enough, the usual 30-40mBp/s throughput. "But how can that be"? he was almost crying. I reminded him it was still 100mb Ethernet on the Airport-N. Apple did not do Gig ethernet on this unit, it would have increased the costs dramatically, almost $1.67 per/unit.
And besides, Apple said we (consumers) didn't need it, and wouldn't know what to do with it anyway. They didn't want us to hurt ourselves.
Dang. Another one going back to California. I have GOT to get away from this ordering the day Apple announces something
Why would I want the new Airport-N? Apple just forgot all the other stuff in the router that pertains to IP, routing and ethernet. It makes the unit no better than the old Extreme.
If I connect at 5.4ghz, my Network Utility says I'm at 300bps. THATS fast for wireless. But so what? I get to the router quicker with N, but the entire router is wrapped around 100-bps [not giga-bit] ethernet!
Apple also made the unit unusable with your non-10.0.x network if you're using a Cable/DSL modem. I'll give the Apple IP guys a 2 on that one.
Well wait a minute - maybe I can use this N stuff for the hard drive. Makes sense. So I connected the USB drive first to the Macbook Pro and did some throughput tests. Very fast indeed actually. About 200mB/sec (that's Bytes not bits).
So I connected the same drive to the Airport-N. After the usual permissions snafu that Apple hasn't dealt with, I did the same testing. About 30mB/sec via the fastest N connection available. And the computer sits right next to the Extreme-N.
So Ok the HDD is a bust, well what about Cable/DSL? Whoooosh - it's off to the router at 300bps, then another slam on the brakes to 1/3 the speed for the Ethernet-Router connection. Then of course Cable is running about 5mbp/s anyway. Oh well, no gain there.
Well wait a minute I'm told by a die-hard Apple fan. "What about your LAN"? he asks. Ok, I'll take a Linksys "G" router ($39.95) and we'll see. Copied files to/from a Sun array, and I'm getting the usual 30-40mBp/s. "Now" said my friend "Now I'll show you what N can really do".
He hooked up the Airport-N to the LAN, and we did the same test. Sure enough, the usual 30-40mBp/s throughput. "But how can that be"? he was almost crying. I reminded him it was still 100mb Ethernet on the Airport-N. Apple did not do Gig ethernet on this unit, it would have increased the costs dramatically, almost $1.67 per/unit.
And besides, Apple said we (consumers) didn't need it, and wouldn't know what to do with it anyway. They didn't want us to hurt ourselves.
Dang. Another one going back to California. I have GOT to get away from this ordering the day Apple announces something