Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
sucks for me, I only use mine as an access point (router software sucks if you want to do anything more advance then the basic stuff.) I would have loved to been able to use the other two ethernet ports to hook stuff up. We tend to saturate the line though.
 
I was just looking at it and was wondering whether the airport drive is as slow as those attached to most other NAS. Read does anyone know if serves faster than lets say 5Mbyte/Sec ?
 
No, you're wrong. The gigabit ports have racing stripes down the side.

:D

And a spoiler. ;)


So, this begs the question, is Apple going to update the Airport Express to similar specs? Right now the Airport Express is the red-headed stepchild of Apple's hardware offerings since the Mac Mini was just updated.
 
Jumbo frames?

Anyone know if the new AE supports jumbo frames over GbE? Or will it take a third revision to get this device right.
 
And yes, for all that were wondering, I do feel screwed for buying the one without the gigabit ethernet a couple months ago...

Amen. They should have a trade-in service or something. All the computers I have hooked to my Airport Extreme have gigabit ethernet and could definitely benefit from it. :mad:
 
Bought one just the other week....but I only use wireless anyway...so no worries! I was more irritated when I bought my MacBook and the local apple store had a sale two weeks later and I would have saved €200. Oh well.....win some lose some! :D
 
Hmmm, your family really really needed Gigabit to transfer huge files between their machines? Or was it their greater-than-100Mbit internet connection? Or maybe, it was your inner-geekiness that's hooked on specs more than functionality that made you go with a much-harder-to-maintain router from another company?

Honestly: I am currently using a 10Mb internet connection that comes with the rent of the flat (and the rent is cheap). It is not an option, the rent is not lowered by not having the internet. A $50 a month extra will get you a 124Mb connection. Yes! Giga-bit is certainly something you DO want. +100Mb internet is easily there by now (at least to the first bottleneck).

Considering HD content, you don't want to move some 10GB by a 100Mb LAN if you can do it 10 times faster... I for one believe that you will feel that yourself in the scope of 12 months or so. If you - like me - haven't upgraded by then, feel free to curse me :)

Best...
 
And a spoiler. ;)


So, this begs the question, is Apple going to update the Airport Express to similar specs? Right now the Airport Express is the red-headed stepchild of Apple's hardware offerings since the Mac Mini was just updated.

I can see apple waiting until 802.11n has some definitive standards to update the Express.

Although I may have to buy the Extreme not that it has gigabit.
 
A Gigabit port looks different than the standard 10/100

No they are both just the same RJ45 connector.

If you really do need 1000BaseT then you can buy a small switch and connect the switch to the router and then have your local LAN running at Gigabit speed. The only thing yu might really want Gigabit for is the conection to a file server or maybe for remote desktop. But mostly if you have a fast file server where you keep you user home directories. If you have a setup like this you likely need a switch anyways. I know I've got many more devices then the Apple router has ports so Ive got a 16 port switch
 
That's nice...how about while they're at it, they add AirTunes so it has all the features that the less expensive model has? I'd love to replace my Express with an Extreme, so I could have one unit that does EVERYTHING, as opposed to what I have now (an Express plugged into a Linksys box).
 
No they are both just the same RJ45 connector.

If you really do need 1000BaseT then you can buy a small switch and connect the switch to the router and then have your local LAN running at Gigabit speed. The only thing yu might really want Gigabit for is the conection to a file server or maybe for remote desktop. But mostly if you have a fast file server where you keep you user home directories. If you have a setup like this you likely need a switch anyways. I know I've got many more devices then the Apple router has ports so Ive got a 16 port switch


Do ANY of you people EVER read other posts??

For the 3rd and last time.

I was thinking of Firewire at the moment.OK?
 
Aren't there incompatibilities between 'jumbo frame' and other 802.11 specs? This may be why Apple hasn't included this support, yet.

I'm not looking for jumbo frame support over the wireless, but rather over the four GbE ports.
 
Do ANY of you people EVER read other posts??

For the 3rd and last time.

I was thinking of Firewire at the moment.OK?

Firewire? But they are not identical! The 400 and the 800 are different connectors.. It is the T100/1000 connectors that are the same.

:D

(sorry, couldn't help myself)
 
I'm not looking for jumbo frame support over the wireless, but rather over the four GbE ports.

I'm not sure, but there are problems with the wired connections to, especially in systems where jumbo framing could actually be used, such as token lans, etc.
I'm not a network guy, so I could be wrong, but this may be a case of Apple ignoring a system that causes more problems than it solves, except in certain particular applications most users are never going to notice.
 
Do ANY of you people EVER read other posts??

For the 3rd and last time.

I was thinking of Firewire at the moment.OK?

Now, they're just having fun with you.

Poor guy. I just made a mistake in the iMac thread, there are apparently two different keyboards, and I expect to hear about it for the next five pages of the thread.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.