Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This would be absolutely fine for me.

We have a set of keys for locks around the house. The back door, the side gate, etc. These are not my keys or my wife's keys. They get misplaced all the time though.

With AirTags currently, only one of us can make the AirTag beep or locate them.

I can't imagine we're that unusual in having items we want to track that aren't "owned" exclusively by one person in the family.
Indeed, and honestly I don't really see any alternatives here, if they do sharing I think they will do either permanent, or rather short term sharing, with like a month being the maximum, and I don't think the system will allow un-sharing without setting the AirTag up from scratch.
 
5 Users on the internet dont like something... leTs MaKe enTirE aRtIclE aBoUT iT!
 
I am one of those idiots that bought 5 of these in the heat of the pre order moment and now I can’t use either of them really cuz the damn affordable keychain Accessoire isn’t available until the end of June! 😅
First don’t order a tracker that has no hole in it
 
Stop fighting it and let duct tape into your life, brother.
Or get creative. I’m a baseball fan. Cut a baseball apart.
225FA25B-030B-4222-8848-67EE1474297C.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: jasweb and joecomo
Its really easy and Im shocked, I tell you, that this learned community cannot figure this out.
Just have them sign in with your Apple ID. Or, just set up another Apple ID for the Tags.
I'm not sure if the snarky response was sarcastic or not, but it would appear that either of these would cause all kinds of other issues. As far as I can tell, Apple has removed the ability to log in to Find My using any account other than the device's main iCloud account. So you have sign your entire device out and back in, including all the prompts for enabling services (I tried this to check). It's not really viable.

The website doesn't work either, as it doesn't include the new Items category.
 
I am one of those idiots that bought 5 of these in the heat of the pre order moment and now I can’t use either of them really cuz the damn affordable keychain Accessoire isn’t available until the end of June! 😅
You should have invested in samsung smart tags plus and ecosystem. It actually has a hole in it for key rings. Make like the rest,drill a hole in the side rim of it
 
Or get creative. I’m a baseball fan. Cut a baseball apart. View attachment 1770301
🤣🤣🤣
I am one of those idiots that bought 5 of these in the heat of the pre order moment and now I can’t use either of them really cuz the damn affordable keychain Accessoire isn’t available until the end of June! 😅
They are just as much as the air tags,$29. Rather wait for allie express,much cheaper
 
Two AirTags per one set of keys, that way you can both track them🤪
May as well just pay to have the van key fob replaced! I’d need to stick 3 trackers on it! ;)

It’s an interesting feature they have omitted. Really hope it comes out when they release AirTags with the M1
chip and mini LED in 2022. Queue the “should I buy now or wait” threads!
 
This is actually not how it seems to work.

The feature people would like to use, from my understanding of the article and to stay with your example, would mean that the kids activate an Airtag with their iPhone, and then share that Airtags location with their parents.

Right now, the parents can already give their kids an Airtag and track them. The kids would have to have an iPhone that notifies them about being tracked, which they could approve if it is from within a family sharing account.
I understand, but nothing is stopping the parents from taking the kids phone, and approving the AirTags without their consent.

If family sharing allows the kid to remove the tag then great, AirTags those house keys.
 
As a workaround, AppleCare told me that a second person can access the Airtag if they log into iCloud>FindMy on the browser, using the Apple ID of the Airtag admin. I tried this trick. I logged into my own iCloud account on Safari with my own iPhone...but I did not see the Airtags listed under FindMy.
 
there will of course be a small design change so the current accessory won't fit
No kidding - The fact that there is nothing to attach the tags usefully to ANYTHING out of the box was Strike 1. Strike 2 was the fact that any of the Apple "accessory" holders cost as much or more than the tags themselves. Strike 3 is the lack of Family Sharing support. At this moment I will assume that Family Sharing will be added at some point but overall I am very disappointed in Apple. As a Family we spend more than 2% of our annual income on Apple products or services (ridiculous I know) so I expect Apple to step up their game, provide features that they obviously have the ability to do as soon as possible or I will only sing songs of disgust
 
Just discovered this issue. We have multiple foster kids at our house - we have two electric-assist bicycles for them to use that I just put AirTags on. It's kind of annoying that they can't keep tabs on the bikes when THEY have them out and about - without doing the "deregister/reregister" dance. Which I don't want to do, since I want to always be able to have access, just "temporarily grant" access to other people when they're using the bikes.
 
You'd think, given that Apple has been developing operating systems since the late '80s towards the multi-user paradigm (with the basis for that paradigm existing well prior), that they'd not be stupid enough to continue making this mistake. You'd think that the security mess that was/is Windows would have been a guiding (warning) light.
Apple's second chance has been mostly to single-user use cases and hence their multi-user features tend to degrade by every release.
  1. The iPod is a single-user device. One can't easily share 80-160GB of music between multiple iTunes accounts and each person having their own music and playlists.
  2. The iPhone is a single-user device. It makes sense since its' a mobile phone at this point.
  3. The iPad started as an extension of the iPhone's operating system and after 10 years still hasn't gain multi-user support.
  4. macOS (X) was multi-user but its multi-user feature gets broken with each enhancement.
  5. tvOS would best be multi-user, but support has been lack-luster thus far. There's not even a way to secure different user profiles.
  6. HomeKit doesn't really work beyond a small apartment populated by a child-less adult couple—mostly with regard to needing a hub that has no multi-user capability.
Hence multi-user isn't in Apple's current practices. At best it's vestigial inherited from NeXT which has been slowly eroded.
 
Apple's second chance has been mostly to single-user use cases and hence their multi-user features tend to degrade by every release.
  1. The iPod is a single-user device. One can't easily share 80-160GB of music between multiple iTunes accounts and each person having their own music and playlists.
  2. The iPhone is a single-user device. It makes sense since its' a mobile phone at this point.
  3. The iPad started as an extension of the iPhone's operating system and after 10 years still hasn't gain multi-user support.
  4. macOS (X) was multi-user but its multi-user feature gets broken with each enhancement.
  5. tvOS would best be multi-user, but support has been lack-luster thus far. There's not even a way to secure different user profiles.
  6. HomeKit doesn't really work beyond a small apartment populated by a child-less adult couple—mostly with regard to needing a hub that has no multi-user capability.
Hence multi-user isn't in Apple's current practices. At best it's vestigial inherited from NeXT which has been slowly eroded.

So that's why they killed their server software and systems. Apple wants people to say 'GET YOUR OWN DAMNED xxxx!!!'?
 
Apple's second chance has been mostly to single-user use cases and hence their multi-user features tend to degrade by every release.
  1. The iPod is a single-user device. One can't easily share 80-160GB of music between multiple iTunes accounts and each person having their own music and playlists.
  2. The iPhone is a single-user device. It makes sense since its' a mobile phone at this point.
  3. The iPad started as an extension of the iPhone's operating system and after 10 years still hasn't gain multi-user support.
  4. macOS (X) was multi-user but its multi-user feature gets broken with each enhancement.
  5. tvOS would best be multi-user, but support has been lack-luster thus far. There's not even a way to secure different user profiles.
  6. HomeKit doesn't really work beyond a small apartment populated by a child-less adult couple—mostly with regard to needing a hub that has no multi-user capability.
Hence multi-user isn't in Apple's current practices. At best it's vestigial inherited from NeXT which has been slowly eroded.
I think it's a projection of Silicon Valley now a days. Very self centered.
 
More like a projection of American Individualism?
I'm a little bit confused by your post. The article you linked to is extreme individualism, which is by definition is different than American individualism.

I will give you that Silicon Valley is currently an example of extreme individualism. Extreme individualism is often destructive, especially now that it is being forced in to our mainstream culture. This results in the destruction of the nuclear family because "my beliefs (realities) trump all others," etc. Extreme individualism thrives on division at every opportunity and encourages continuous conflict where there once was none, or very little. The average American does not fall in to this category.

American Individualism is a good thing. It allows us to ask ourselves what skill and abilities do I have, and how can I use them to better my status in life by utilizing them to serve the needs of others, who are willing to spend their capital on the products/goods/services that I can provide.

That's what made America go from worst to first in such an unprecedented short amount of time.
 
I'm a little bit confused by your post. The article you linked to is extreme individualism, which is by definition is different than American individualism.

I will give you that Silicon Valley is currently an example of extreme individualism. Extreme individualism is often destructive, especially now that it is being forced in to our mainstream culture. This results in the destruction of the nuclear family because "my beliefs (realities) trump all others," etc. Extreme individualism thrives on division at every opportunity and encourages continuous conflict where there once was none, or very little. The average American does not fall in to this category.

American Individualism is a good thing. It allows us to ask ourselves what skill and abilities do I have, and how can I use them to better my status in life by utilizing them to serve the needs of others, who are willing to spend their capital on the products/goods/services that I can provide.

That's what made America go from worst to first in such an unprecedented short amount of time.

It sounds that you’re an American—from the knee-jerk reaction of defending The US’ style of individualism. If you took the time to click-through the article and into Hofstede’s research, you can see that the US is among the extremities of the individualist countries of the world.

Sure the US is a large country and arguably a country of countries due to its federal system. Hence when zoomed in could show the different kinds of individualism. Nevertheless mobility between states are relatively unrestricted (notably pre-pandemic), hence performing such study state-by-state would create data that gets stale easily.

Back to the original topic, Apple’s systems are inherently bad at multi-users since the original Mac. Perhaps there’s a vestige of multi-user coming from NeXT, but that have not been maintained properly. Maybe it’s Apple, maybe it’s general Silicon Valley, or maybe it’s general American—I wouldn’t know, I’m don’t delve into such studies. In any case, Apple does not command exclusive employments of engineers—and I have seen language that’s normally reserved for Windows systems to be used in Apple’s SDK docs (e.g. “DLL”), denoting that at least the technical writer came from the Windows world.

I can only think of Ubuntu as the only other end-user system nowadays that’s not coming from the US. It started in South Africa and now incorporated in the UK. It’s multi-user support is quite solid, the last time I check.

PS: there is no such thing as the average American. As studied by Americans.
PS 2: Even the word American enforces the US’ sense of self-supremacy (read: individualism). There are two sub-continents that makes up The Americas, the northern one shared by three countries and the southern one by even more. Yet the word American became synonymous with “A USA Citizen”.
 
Last edited:
It sounds that you’re an American—from the knee-jerk reaction of defending The US’ style of individualism. If you took the time to click-through the article and into Hofstede’s research, you can see that the US is among the extremities of the individualist countries of the world.

Sure the US is a large country and arguably a country of countries due to its federal system. Hence when zoomed in could show the different kinds of individualism. Nevertheless mobility between states are relatively unrestricted (notably pre-pandemic), hence performing such study state-by-state would create data that gets stale easily.

Back to the original topic, Apple’s systems are inherently bad at multi-users since the original Mac. Perhaps there’s a vestige of multi-user coming from NeXT, but that have not been maintained properly. Maybe it’s Apple, maybe it’s general Silicon Valley, or maybe it’s general American—I wouldn’t know, I’m don’t delve into such studies. In any case, Apple does not command exclusive employments of engineers—and I have seen language that’s normally reserved for Windows systems to be used in Apple’s SDK docs (e.g. “DLL”), denoting that at least the technical writer came from the Windows world.

I can only think of Ubuntu as the only other end-user system nowadays that’s not coming from the US. It started in South Africa and now incorporated in the UK. It’s multi-user support is quite solid, the last time I check.

PS: there is no such thing as the average American. As studied by Americans.
PS 2: Even the word American enforces the US’ sense of self-supremacy (read: individualism). There are two sub-continents that makes up The Americas, the northern one shared by three countries and the southern one by even more. Yet the word American became synonymous with “A USA Citizen”.
Sounds like you are not an American judging that individualism is a bad thing. I did read through the article thank you, and as I mentioned there is a difference between extreme individualism and individualism. Just because America is more individualistic than most other countries does not make it "extreme" and that is my point.

And while I'm not here to write a paper on American exceptionalism, it is easy to say "there is no average American" when you cherry pick a trait or two. Unlike any other country we have people from around the world come here. Bringing pieces of their culture with them. That is why America was called the melting pot, generally taking the best of what each culture has to offer.

Getting back to the subject at hand, my Commodore VIC 20 was a single user experience. It was discontinued in 1985. NEXT was introduced in 1988. At the time it was near impossible to dedicate machine resources for an individual experience. Air Tags is using 1980's methodology with 2020 technology.
 
Getting back to the subject at hand, my Commodore VIC 20 was a single user experience. It was discontinued in 1985. NEXT was introduced in 1988. At the time it was near impossible to dedicate machine resources for an individual experience. Air Tags is using 1980's methodology with 2020 technology.
Not necessarily a tech limitation. Tile is able to share a tile between more than one user. It’s Apple’s conscious decision to prioritize the singe-user case. Just like how it breaks many of macOS’ multi-user experience and never properly provide multiple profiles accross its iOS-derived products.

Is it individualism? Perhaps. Is it short-sightedness derived from an individualistic culture? Likely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Razorpit
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.