I was mistaken. It was FaceTime. Someone corrected me earlier.I'm interested to read a source or citation to this promise, if you have one.
It very much is but you know how some of these cross platform Apple users are.Right. I just don't understand jumping through hoops to have iMessage on unsupported devices. Just seems niche.
I'm deep in the Apple ecosystem, and I'm still interested. I live in Europe where almost no-one uses iMessage. Everybody has FB Messenger and Whatsapp, and just recently there's an increased interest in Signal and Telegram. But I don't want to carry around 5 messenger apps.It very much is but you know how some of these cross platform Apple users are.
I get that but from an American perspective and even a general consensus perspective nobody is going to pay $10 for an average at best experience which will likely get blocked by Apple since it is against their terms of service I’d imagine.In a perfect world where everyone uses iMessage except that one loser friend with an Android device, I understand your point. But most of the world is not like that and iMessage is not used a lot.
There’s no reason why in 2021 communication channels like direct chat should be proprietary. Similar to email, there should be an open protocol for chat, and then it doesn’t matter what client you use.I get that but from an American perspective and even a general consensus perspective nobody is going to pay $10 for an average at best experience which will likely get blocked by Apple since it is against their terms of service I’d imagine.
and this is coming from the girl who was a big windows phone fan and had to use third party apps to be able to use tinder, Snapchat and YouTube. I get the need for it but I also don’t support it because it seems like a security risk.
that’s the beauty of a smartphone. You don’t have to use iMessage. Many friends of mine I don’t have their numbers. We talk on snap. We talk on messenger. Kik. Twitter. Insta Etc etc.
It’s 2021. There’s a universal app we all use that at least one of us has so if we neee a group chat we likely have it. Sms still works for group chats.
Exactly. I need to have Telegram, Whatsapp, FB Messenger, Hangouts etc.I'm deep in the Apple ecosystem, and I'm still interested. I live in Europe where almost no-one uses iMessage. Everybody has FB Messenger and Whatsapp, and just recently there's an increased interest in Signal and Telegram. But I don't want to carry around 5 messenger apps.
If I could integrate them all in one, I'm all for it. I would no longer have to think about which channel to use to contact a friend or group.
In a perfect world where everyone uses iMessage except that one loser friend with an Android or Windows device, I understand your point. But most of the world is not like that and iMessage is not used a lot.
There’s no reason why in 2021 communication channels like direct chat should be proprietary. Just like email is an open protocol, there should be one for chat, and then it doesn’t matter what client you use.
This is the long term vision of Beeper. They do support the open Matrix protocol but also current proprietary protocols using bridges. Over time people should move away from them and use the open protocol.
That way there will be a boost in client app innovation, universal search becomes possible, snoozing work chats, etc. And you don’t need to think about the envelope and channel, only the message content.
But you are definitely right that they will never realise this vision of it costs 10 dollars a month while the current offerings are free.
I'm thinking from a very egoistic perspective. Larger proportion of friends using iMessage is generally better. By opening it up to Android users, Apple users won't need WhatsApp or similar isnt installed (and have data mined) to effectively share images, videos.It doesn't ruin the experience for or my friends who use Android. For them to integrate into that App would require them to support RCS which they are not going to be doing. Somethings should remain exclusive to Apple only. But it's nice to know not everyone agrees which me and that is swell![]()
Afaik that was FaceTime. Before iMessage was iMessage (and introduced to the world) they tried to have it as the new texting standard to replace SMS and showed it off to carriers, who then literally told them to **** off cause of E2EE (and potentially little control over it, unlike RCS where they can do whatever). That‘s when they decided to do iMessage.Wasn’t an original promise of iMessage that it would be cross-platform? I guess Apple ended up realizing it was actually a draw for it to be exclusive...
No, but I've followed Apple long enough to know that they will use just about any means possible to shut things like this down. They will likely use the fact that the company is sending you a jailbroken device, calling it a DMCA violation.There is nothing illegal about a jailbroken iPhone. Or any of this. Are you stupid?
what I'm saying is that historically, Apple goes after things like this. Don't be surprised if they come after this one.
I was mistaken. It was FaceTime. Someone corrected me earlier.