Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hands up, how many people have WiFi 7 routers at home,

I will. Waiting for the Xfinity XB10 to be released, hopefully by the end of this year.

Does anyone really have more than 1 gigabit / s at home or do that much local area networking?

I do.

Future feature proofing.

Yes.

You get a modem that supports multi-gigabit, yet you rarely see more than 100-200mbps speeds in real life.

I've had ~1400 Mbs connections with my iPhone 15 Pro Max since it came out with 6E.
 
🙋‍♂️
At home. TP-Link Deco BE65.
When apple announced something and are in line with modern capabilities, “no one wants this or has the means to take advantage.” When they announce something and aren’t first to the party, “apple sucks and never innovate and android has had this for years.” 🤦🏾‍♂️🤷🏾‍♂️✌🏾
 
  • Like
Reactions: xmach
We have 300mbit down; gigabit is available but have no use for it and we barely use 300-400gb/month in total with 4 people, so I about we would.
Well, you are obviously not the target audience then.
In some countries 300 Mbps is already obsolete, not available anymore, only 500 Mbps and up. And soon only 1 Gbps and up. The tiers will be as follows: 1 - 2.5 - 5 - 10 Gbps.

The amount of data used doesn't matter. It's about how fast you want something done, time is money.
In real life, let's say you go out of the country a couple times only, but prefer to take a flight to get there faster, rather than wasting your time driving.

Imagine downloading a 150GB game on Steam, it takes only 20 minutes on a 1 Gbps connection, but you have to wait over 1 hour on a 300 Mbps connection.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jocamero and xmach
I'm an outlier, but I have synchronous 10Gbps fiber to the home, with municipal fiber. It's connected to a Ubiquiti EFG that routes at up to 25Gbps. My current APs all have a 2.5Gbps uplinks. MBP is connected via 10Gbps fiber. So, yes, as a big tech nerd, I'm super excited for Wi‑Fi 7 and its advantages. 🤓

Multi-Link Operation (MLO), is what I'm most excited for. It allows a device to simultaneously use multiple frequencies. (e.g. 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz and 6 GHz, all at the same time)

More info: https://www.tp-link.com/us/blog/1067/what-is-wifi-7-s-multi-link-operation-mlo-/
I also have 10Gb fiber with Unifi network. It's fantastic. It looks like MLO finally became a feature in the Unifi early access channel, just 2 weeks ago. I hear it's buggy, but I'll be interested to test it when I get the iPhone.

It still pisses me off the Vision Pro doesn't have 6E support, but worse, no ethernet capability via dongle. Running ALVR requires very high bandwidth and very low latency. It works well in my network, I can average around 700 Mb on the 5 Ghz channel on the Vision pro (iPerf to my host PC), but it could be much better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jocamero and xmach
what is this? Will it make my stupid Robot Vacuum finally work? Its 2024 and this "smart 2.4G" robot can't even connect to 2.4 network.
 
I have the UniFi U6 enterprise AP's and they run WARM. The newer U7 Pro's that launched earlier this year have fans built inside so I'm going to wait until that improves.

Don't expect to see wifi 7 at airports or businesses anytime soon. The offices where I've deployed them already are power hungry, failing faster and have required new injectors and switches which is making upgrades more costly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jocamero
Well, you are obviously not the target audience then.
In some countries 300 Mbps is already obsolete, not available anymore, only 500 Mbps and up. And soon only 1 Gbps and up. The tiers will be as follows: 1 - 2.5 - 5 - 10 Gbps.

The amount of data used doesn't matter. It's about how fast you want something done, time is money.
In real life, let's say you go out of the country a couple times only, but prefer to take a flight to get there faster, rather than wasting your time driving.

Imagine downloading a 150GB game on Steam, it takes only 20 minutes on a 1 Gbps connection, but you have to wait over 1 hour on a 300 Mbps connection.

I get it it, but we don't have any gamers in the house, and waiting an hour vs 30 mins isn't a big deal. The kids play Minecraft and Stardew Valley, and we have a switch. That's all, and no one has a Steam account.. We're not big internet users.

300 was the minimum offering. No sense in spending unnecessary money on a faster connection we wouldn't take advantage of.
 
Last edited:
"Great, now I can use it with my Wifi 7 router that totally didn't cost an arm and a leg" - said no one ever
Wifi 7 is invaluable for a variety of local wireless computing use cases and not trivial to implement.

Things can't always cost the same as before when the advancements are much more complex and higher in costs to provide in more risky economy (and suppliers asking for more money in the process).

Even consoles have raised prices. These are not normal time.

If you want the privilege to use Wifi 7, you're gonna have to wait some more till it hits your ideal price (within reason and educated on how. realistic your budget) or accept you'll have to pay more than what you'd like if you want it today
 
  • Like
Reactions: drrich2
Does anyone really have more than 1 gigabit / s at home or do that much local area networking? Especially with apple devices where the trend is client -> iCloud...

I fail to see who cares about wifi 7.

1.6gbit here, but you're right not much LAN on a phone, LOTs from my MacBook though where i'd love Wifi 7 and yet i'm 95% sure we'll see Wifi 6e like the M4 iPad when they launch at the end of the year unfortunately.
 
I'm quite critical of Apple on a number of points, but hats off to them for getting Wifi 7 in this early. Now impress me again when the next round of Macs are announced, perhaps in October...
Ditto. Until this Wi-Fi 7 surprise with all four iPhones 16, I had low expectations for this fall's coming Macs (i.e. I expected them to have only 6e). But now we can reasonably expect the coming MacBook Pro's, etc. to support Wi-Fi 7.

I wonder what the corporate explanation is for why Apple has been so conspicuously behind on supporting the latest-generation Wi-Fi technology in most of its products for the past several years, but now finally it seems to be acting more like what we'd expect from a/the leading technology company. Has there been any change in suppliers -- do we know who made the Wi-Fi chips in last year's iPhones 15, compared to the current iPhones 16? (Broadcom??)

On a related note, it's worth pointing out that a number of Apple's products are still limited to Wi-Fi 4(!!) for example HomePod 2G and HomePod mini, and even the just-introduced Apple Watch Series 10. Also as someone else mentioned, the Vision Pro supports only Wi-Fi 6, not 6E (which it surely could use, and despite having been marketed after last year's iPhone 15 Pro).
 
I have never seen a WiFi 7 router, and I just upgraded to WiFi 6 routers late last year. No one in the house could tell a difference.

It'll be another decade before I upgrade again. 🤣
I upgraded to 6 a year ago and could tell immediately with range and throughput. My car and backyard get WiFi signal and speeds are still strong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drrich2
I upgraded to 6 a year ago and could tell immediately with range and throughput. My car and backyard get WiFi signal and speeds are still strong.

I could tell a difference in range, but not throughput, but I did a mesh setup when I upgraded so that could be why. Three eero 6 wired in out large house house. I'm adding one to the barn too, when I get around to do. It's about 300 yards away, so I'm going to do a point-to-point link.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.