BEFORE installation. After installation, $1000+.
if thats what youre paying for installation, youre doing it wrong. ive had free install at Best Buy, to $100+. not $500-700.
----------
This sounds good in theory but I would love to see it in action. In particular, going on a road trip and using the iPhone maps to navigate. If you lose signal, wouldn't that make the maps app and phone useless at that point? I seen this before with an older phone thinking that a phone could replace a portable Garmen.
apple said CarPlay-optmized apps will be possible on the head units. id imagine some of the offline-enabled nav apps will apply and obtain CarPlay compatibility -- like Garmin's USA app, etc.
----------
Unless there were a way for an aftermarket unit to include a gps chip that apple could partner with a tom tom or garmin type company to allow for navigation in the car without using cellular service. (I don't think this is going to happen but it would be cool)
the GPS chip is independent from cellular antennas. when i travel abroad i disable cellular but GPS still works. Garmin promotes their app for such non-cellular scenarios.
----------
Pass.
Aftermarket is the key to Carplay success but at these price points they will not sell in large quantities.
these arent price points -- these are rumors. how can you pass on a product that doesnt exist at a price that hasnt been announced?
remember when they said ipad would start at $1000?
----------
$500-$700 is ridiculously overpriced for what it is.
er, "what it is"? it doesnt even exist. it's a rumored product at a rumored price by a foreign newspaper.
----------
I still don't even get what the CarPlay does that's so amazing. I think it's been explained to me before. But haven't people been able to do what the CarPlay does wirelessly for years? I don't have a car with one of those screens or a smartphone, but I see people with their phones wirelessly connected to screens all the time. It seems like the iPhone does that but over a wire.
yes it's true, you dont get what it does. and no, people cannot currently do what CarPlay is hoped to do.
----------
It's not an iPad. It's a radio with a screen. I guess it would have to be a double DIN for Maps, but I don't know.
definitely double-DIN.
----------
My eyes are on the road, not electro-whiz-screens. Maps have turn by turn nav, Bluetooth some music. Can't say that one 'needs' much more.
what's an electro-whiz screen?
if youve spent any great amount of time on the road w/ your phone, then you know its not designed for you to be futzing on it while driving. also, a small screen is not ideal for nav -- note that no auto manufacture builds a nav system w/ a puny cell-sized screen. bigger is better, and theres no denying it.
----------
Is this something that will even be feasible today? Almost all recent cars have elaborate built-in radios and other electronic systems. And it's been like that for quite a few years.
no. most use standard single or double DIN head units, underneath custom dash moulding to disguise that from you. just call a mobile installer or use crutchfield to see what your car can get.
You'll need a car that is capable of accepting an aftermarket car stereo with a large screen... and be willing to part with $1000+
why would i spend $1000? Pioneer's AppRadio series begin at $300 and sport integration w/ iOS including external display support and touch-support for compatible apps.
----------
That's why I use a Note 3 and cheap bluetooth head units.
yeah, but then you have to use a Note 3. this is iOS.
Once Apple releases a larger iPhone interest in this goofy idea will die quickly. [...] Other than music, gps and hands free calling what else do you really need while driving? What else are you suppose to do while driving a vehicle?
thats exactly what it's for -- music, gps, hands free calling, and eyes-free texting. in a big screen thats better than a cell phone's.