Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

uzapucax1

macrumors member
Original poster
Sep 29, 2022
47
4
Hi people!
Do you know of alternatives of good Externals SSD for the Mac Mini 2020? Mine has an internal of 512 GB but it would be nice to have an external for future working files and music at least 1TB

I read some good things in this forum about the


Good speed and the price is right. The form factor kind of clash with Mac Mini aesthetics but it could be a good choice.


This model was also mention but i find it too expensive and i don't know if it worth it


Any other alternatives that you might suggest?
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Like
Reactions: uzapucax1
For fastest speeds, you can buy an NVMe SSD + an enclosure:


That seems like a good combo and price as well.
Is there any drawback between an NVMe compared to a regular SSD?

Speed is important but since they are working file life span of the drive is also good to consider.

Best
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
That seems like a good combo and price as well.
Is there any drawback between an NVMe compared to a regular SSD?

Speed is important but since they are working file life span of the drive is also good to consider.

Best

Actually, I think that Anker enclosure would not be ideal for the NVMe SSD I linked, as the enclosure maxes out at 10Gbps which is only 1250 MB/s, thus making it barely faster than the Samsung one you listed (which apparently is also an NVMe, but limited by the enclosure they pair it with). Check this video out:

 
  • Like
Reactions: uzapucax1
Actually, I think that Anker enclosure would not be ideal for the NVMe SSD I linked, as the enclosure maxes out at 10Gbps which is only 1250 MB/s, thus making it barely faster than the Samsung one you listed (which apparently is also an NVMe, but limited by the enclosure they pair it with). Check this video out:

Very good info and video too!
I am checking that Mac Mini M1 has USB 3.1 version so most modern USB versions will not work or be as fast. Is that right?

By the way, what do you think about this housing paired with Samsung EVO NVMe SSD?

Housing

SSD


This housing alternative look interesting too

 
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Very good info and video too!
I am checking that Mac Mini M1 has USB 3.1 version so most modern USB versions will not work or be as fast. Is that right?

By the way, what do you think about this housing paired with Samsung EVO NVMe SSD?

Housing

SSD


This housing alternative look interesting too


According to the tech specs, your 2020 Mac Mini M1 (the same one I have, btw) is Thunderbolt 3 / USB 4 compatible, so just be sure the enclosure you get is USB 4 for max performance.


Screen Shot 2022-10-14 at 9.41.06 AM.png
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Like
Reactions: uzapucax1
Thanks for the update!
I got confussed with the USB A being 3.1 but TB or USB 4 is the same, i did not know that.

I think i have to find a housing tha supports USB 4 now (which is USB C in form, right?). I hope i can get one housing that is not very expensive. The video has very good suggestions but they are a bit pricey right now.

I guess the Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe is good enough.

Best
 
Thanks for the update!
I got confussed with the USB A being 3.1 but TB or USB 4 is the same, i did not know that.

I think i have to find a housing tha supports USB 4 now (which is USB C in form, right?). I hope i can get one housing that is not very expensive. The video has very good suggestions but they are a bit pricey right now.

I guess the Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe is good enough.

Best

It's very confusing. Here is a chart that helps a lot, though. According to the M1 Mini tech specs, the 2 USB-A ports on our Mac Mins are USB 3.2 Gen 1 (max 5 Gbps / 625 MB/s). The Thunderbolt 3 / USB 4 ports (max 40 Gbps / 5000 MB/s) are backwards compatible with USB 3.2 Gen 2 (formerly called 3.1 Gen 2 as Apple shows . . . confused yet?).

USB_Standards_and_Connector_Shapes.jpg


USB_Specifications.jpg


 
This is a very good explanation but it will take a while to digest 😅😅
 
It's very confusing. Here is a chart that helps a lot, though. According to the M1 Mini tech specs, the 2 USB-A ports on our Mac Mins are USB 3.2 Gen 1 (max 5 Gbps / 625 MB/s). The Thunderbolt 3 / USB 4 ports (max 40 Gbps / 5000 MB/s) are backwards compatible with USB 3.2 Gen 2 (formerly called 3.1 Gen 2 as Apple shows . . . confused yet?).

USB_Standards_and_Connector_Shapes.jpg


USB_Specifications.jpg


By the way, considering that list and in your expert opinion which do you think is the best match for around $200 for a good housing or enclouse and the Samsung 870 NMVe SSD?

USB 4 should be nice but $170 for just the enclosure is too much for me now and unfortunately the nice and budget ICY BOX are all unavailable in Amazon right now

Thanks again for the help! :)
 
Well, I'm not an expert! But based on your criteria, you'd actually be paying more for the Samsung 970 ($100) + Icy Box ($45) than just getting the original Samsung Extreme you originally linked ($127) and I don't think the internal Samsung 970 would get you any better performance due to the limitations of the Icy Box 10 Gbps max speed. In either case, though, it's definitely going to be much faster than an HDD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uzapucax1
Well, I'm not an expert! But based on your criteria, you'd actually be paying more for the Samsung 970 ($100) + Icy Box ($45) than just getting the original Samsung Extreme you originally linked ($127) and I don't think the internal Samsung 970 would get you any better performance due to the limitations of the Icy Box 10 Gbps max speed. In either case, though, it's definitely going to be much faster than an HDD.

The Sans Extreme SSD sounds a a good option then. Too bad is a bit ugly for a Mac Mini setting but passing that it is very good as a choice.

Thanks for the help! :)
 
What about the sleek, small and elegant looking Samsung T7? It comes in 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB if I recall correctly. Also comes in one's choice of colors: Royal Blue, Red, and Gray.

 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Like
Reactions: uzapucax1
What about the sleek, small and elegant looking Samsung T7? It comes in 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB if I recall correctly. Also comes in one's choice of colors: Royal Blue, Red, and Gray.

That Samsung disk is really nice in design. It is even $30 less expensive than the Sans disk and I guess they both have the same features regarding speed which is 10 GB/s, right?

The only point is that Hard Disk Interface for the Sans Disk says USB 3.2 and the Samsung USB 1.1 which is slower.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
That Samsung disk is really nice in design. It is even $30 less expensive than the Sans disk and I guess they both have the same features regarding speed which is 10 GB/s, right?

The only point is that Hard Disk Interface for the Sans Disk says USB 3.2 and the Samsung USB 1.1 which is slower.

I know all these acronyms are confusing, but it's 10 Gbps (gigabits per second), not 10 GB/s (gigabytes per second). 10 GB/s would be 10,000 MB/s, but 10 Gbps is 1,250 MB/s 😉

Also, that USB 1.1 has to be a misprint in the product details. It says USB 3.2 Gen 2 in the title of the product. And USB 1.1 is not going to have 1050/1000 MB/s read/write speeds like they state.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uzapucax1
@uzapucax1, I know you said you said you need the drive for working files and music, but what type of working files and what type of music files?

If you're talking about huge design files and music production, then perhaps you need a super fast drive, but if you're talking about Office files and MP3s for playing in the background, then any drive will do.

What about the sleek, small and elegant looking Samsung T7? It comes in 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB if I recall correctly. Also comes in one's choice of colors: Royal Blue, Red, and Gray.

The T7 Shield is faster for sustained transfers than the T7 in reviews. ie. They behave differently. Or at least the models they tested (with the same capacity) behave differently.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Like
Reactions: uzapucax1
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Like
Reactions: uzapucax1
I know all these acronyms are confusing, but it's 10 Gbps (gigabits per second), not 10 GB/s (gigabytes per second). 10 GB/s would be 10,000 MB/s, but 10 Gbps is 1,250 MB/s 😉

Also, that USB 1.1 has to be a misprint in the product details. It says USB 3.2 Gen 2 in the title of the product. And USB 1.1 is not going to have 1050/1000 MB/s read/write speeds like they state.
Thanks for the good info!
Sometimes it gets confusing.

You are right about the Samsung T7 being USB 3.2 Gen. 🙌
 
@uzapucax1, I know you said you said you need the drive for working files and music, but what type of working files and what type of music files?

If you're talking about huge design files and music production, then perhaps you need a super fast drive, but if you're talking about Office files and MP3s for playing in the background, then any drive will do.


The T7 Shield is faster for sustained transfers than the T7 in reviews. ie. They behave differently. Or at least the models they tested (with the same capacity) behave differently.

I work mostly in graphic design with Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator files. Illustrator is a bit of a "heavy" app with files that can have 500 Mb and upwards. I don't how that compares in resources with Music Production. I know is not as demanding as Video Editing.

In my previous Mac Mini 2014 1.4 GHz the beach ball did appear from time to time working with large files. It supposed to be a slow Mac. Nevertheless it does have a OWC SSD Aura Pro X2 de 1.0 TB which i used as the main OS system, Apps and Files disk. It supposed to be noticeable fast but to be honest i could not see that. Maybe i did not configure it the right way. I don't know. Maybe even with the OWC Aura Pro X2 cannot do too much if I have a 1.4 GHZ chip.

The T7 Shield SSD looks like a nice and fast workhorse and worth to be a viable option as well.

By the way, how come this SSD is so affordable? It supposed to be fast because is Games oriented, right?

 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Arcasis Thunderbolt case with Sabrent Rocket is working very well with 2300 MB/s write and 2800 read.
I have this combo as System Disk.

Looks like a really solid option too. I does have very good recomendation in the video review posted in this tread.
I thought i was only in Amazon Germany but i was found it in the US.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
I work mostly in graphic design with Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator files. Illustrator is a bit of a "heavy" app with files that can have 500 Mb and upwards. I don't how that compares in resources with Music Production. I know is not as demanding as Video Editing.

In my previous Mac Mini 2014 1.4 GHz the beach ball did appear from time to time working with large files. It supposed to be a slow Mac. Nevertheless it does have a OWC SSD Aura Pro X2 de 1.0 TB which i used as the main OS system, Apps and Files disk. It supposed to be noticeable fast but to be honest i could not see that. Maybe i did not configure it the right way. I don't know. Maybe even with the OWC Aura Pro X2 cannot do too much if I have a 1.4 GHZ chip.
That 1.4 GHz 2014 Mac mini is super slow. In recent times, SSD made it tolerable for office use (if it had 8 GB or more RAM) but not for graphic design. Even a super fast SSD is not going to change that.

I'm running an 8 GB 2014 Mac mini with 2.6 GHz Core i5-4278U and that's pretty slow too. I mean it's fine for my business application usage, but even 4 years ago I wouldn't have recommended it for graphic design, even if it had 16 GB RAM.


By the way, how come this SSD is so affordable? It supposed to be fast because is Games oriented, right?

That's a spinning hard drive, not an SSD.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Like
Reactions: uzapucax1
That 1.4 GHz 2014 Mac mini is super slow. In recent times, SSD made it tolerable for office use (if it had 8 GB or more RAM) but not for graphic design. Even a super fast SSD is not going to change that.

I'm running an 8 GB 2014 Mac mini with 2.6 GHz Core i5-4278U and that's pretty slow too. I mean it's fine for my business application usage, but even 4 years ago I wouldn't have recommended it for graphic design, even if it had 16 GB RAM.



That's a spinning hard drive, not an SSD.
You are right the Mac Mini 1.4 GHz 2014 is way too slow.
Upgrading its orginal internal fusion drive to an NMVe OWC SSD Aura Pro X2 de 1.0 TB, was a waste of time and money. 🙁

Well, i learn a new thing with that 😀
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.