Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Aluminum or Stainless?
- Thread starter judyg951
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
DragonPrime120
macrumors member
I would get the stainless, it has an extremely scratch-resistant sapphire screen and a ceramic back (although aluminum watches have ceramic backs if you get the LTE+GPS). I had an original sport, but I switched to stainless mid cycle. I got space black steel again with Series 2, and now again with Series 3. I think you'll appreciate the material difference. But if you get Steel, I'd get the black, since it hides the scratches that steel can get.
hank moody
macrumors 6502a
wxnats
macrumors 6502a
What bands do you have for your black SS? I ordered a S3 Black SS; I’ve been looking at some 3rd party brown leather (with black lugs) bands that I like.
jbachandouris
macrumors 603
Stainless. It looks better than an overpriced Fitbit, the sapphire crystal is resistant to scratches, and you can respectively wear it as a nice watch. I recommend the black version over the silver. The screen just looks like one piece on the black model and others have said it hides minor scuffs.
Phonephreak
macrumors 6502a
I’m going to be unpopular but I went from stainless to aluminium when I went from series 0 to 2. I found it not to have scratches on the body and with the stainless steel I had many but I have scratches on the sides of the face now.
I appreciate how light it is as well. That being said, I wear other watches on more formal days which are stainless steel too. I found when I moved to this Watch, the stainless steel did not have a good re sale value as someone above has mentioned.
I appreciate how light it is as well. That being said, I wear other watches on more formal days which are stainless steel too. I found when I moved to this Watch, the stainless steel did not have a good re sale value as someone above has mentioned.
gatorknight904
macrumors 6502a
my s2 was alum, new one is space black stainless, man its so damn nice. Stainless for the win all day.
captain poopers
macrumors member
SS for me simply for the Sapphire face. I'm hard on watches and I can handle a scuffed body, but a scuffed face would drive me insane.
Xarthan
macrumors regular
I went Stainless this time (Got Aluminum for S0, S2) mainly so I don't have to worry about getting scratches on the screen. I was pretty careful with my past two watches, but things do happen out of your control, with the Sapphire Screen, I just don't have to be as careful now.
I had regular aluminum for S0, now have black stainless for S3 w/LTE.
The black stainless looks much more premium than aluminum, very modern and almost a "one piece" design of the case and crystal. Yes, it is heavier, but if you're already used to wearing a watch, you'll be fine.
The main thing I didn't like about aluminum was how badly the crystal scratched. Mine looked pretty bad after 1.5 years.
The black stainless looks much more premium than aluminum, very modern and almost a "one piece" design of the case and crystal. Yes, it is heavier, but if you're already used to wearing a watch, you'll be fine.
The main thing I didn't like about aluminum was how badly the crystal scratched. Mine looked pretty bad after 1.5 years.
Luba
macrumors 68000
Interesting video, but at Mohs 6 and 7, it might be the coating that's scratched. What do you think? The line through 12:00 is Mohs 6, and 1:00 is Mohs 7, and finally the scratch line through 2:00 is Mohs 8. After he puts a flame to the screen to burn away the coating, at 12:00 and 1:00 it looks more like smudges. I don't see scratch lines. At 2:00 I do see scratch lines. Also if the flame burned away the coating completely why do we see different tones (colors) on the screen? Should it all that's left be the scratches?
Take a look and tell me what you think? I want to be wrong since then I would save money getting the aluminum with the Ion-X Glass, plus with the Ion-X Glass the screen is slightly more clear than the sapphire, since the Ion-X Glass reflects ambient light less.
Interesting. The original watch sapphire face as tested by Consumer Reports did not scratch on their hardest pick (9).
I just sold my Series 2 black stainless and the purchaser told me that he could find no scratches or signs of wear anywhere. And that watch was constantly banging into things for a year.
I had the silver stainless. The scratches were very visible and it drove me crazy. Not interested in spending my time buffing them out. Lots of scratches on my black stainless band (as I said, I'm very hard on watches), but you have to look really hard to see them.
I just sold my Series 2 black stainless and the purchaser told me that he could find no scratches or signs of wear anywhere. And that watch was constantly banging into things for a year.
I had the silver stainless. The scratches were very visible and it drove me crazy. Not interested in spending my time buffing them out. Lots of scratches on my black stainless band (as I said, I'm very hard on watches), but you have to look really hard to see them.
I see, that’s is very possible. I’ll leave and comment to him and see if he can confirm that. You have very good eyes.
Another thing I found in a study was the sapphire screen performed worse under strong light, which I remember my old S0 stainless steel had that issue, I wonder if the new S3 has improved?
If the scratches were just on the coating, I might even consider to switch to black stainless myself!
Treebark
macrumors 6502
If you go stainless, and the silver variety, get something like Cape Cod Metal Polishing cloths so you can easily keep it polished / shiny: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B...ia-20&linkId=2e2510156c64574a3dbfa09fe5a34492
Personally I wish they offered the sapphire on the aluminum case. My wife has the stainless, but I prefer the lightness of the aluminum. If you don’t like big watches, you may prefer the aluminum too. The size isn’t different, but the heft certainly is.
Personally I wish they offered the sapphire on the aluminum case. My wife has the stainless, but I prefer the lightness of the aluminum. If you don’t like big watches, you may prefer the aluminum too. The size isn’t different, but the heft certainly is.
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Luba
macrumors 68000
Good points, it's true it's only a matter of grams, but the aluminum feels like nothing while with the steel you do feel it. I don't mind, as I have steel for two years, and it looks like I'm going to have Space Black steel this time. If I had ordered the Space Gray with Gray sport band, I might have gone with Space Gray. Or if the Nike Space Gray was available now. But I have Space Black setup with cellular and don't think I want to delete cellular and set it up on another AW. Space Black does look a bit better IMO than the Space Gray, especially with the Red Dot. I think the Red Dot looks a bit better with black. I had a small number of very fine scratches on steel, wasn't worth polishing out, but with Space Black I don't think those very fine scratches would even show up because of the DLC coating on the Space Black.
In a way, I think the Ion-X glass vs sapphire is a tie. The Ion-X display is a bit more clear to look at, but the sapphire is more scratch proof. Sapphire most likely scratches at Mohs 8, while Ion-X glass scratches at Mohs 6. I don't know if Mohs 8 vs Mohs 6 is a big difference or not, in real life. Some have posted they were really careful and were shocked to discover a scratch on Ion-X.
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
This will be the first time I try the Ion-X Glass. I had a SS Apple Watch 1, and the screen cracked after a short drop on tile floor. My wife dropped her Ion-X many more times and no cracked at all. The weight itself might has a lot to do with it. My screen was also a lot harder to see under sunlight compare to hers. I still like the premium feel of the SS and sapphire, but since now I'm much more active I am afraid I will break another sapphire screen.
Last edited:
Luba
macrumors 68000
Do you mean series 0 steel? 🙂 Direct sunlight on my steel AW0 washed almost everything out. 1000 nits on the AW2 made a big difference. Looking forward to hearing about your experience with the Ion-X!
staggerlee41
macrumors 65816
I sat out on Watch until 2 came out. Water resistance and GPS were what I really was waiting for. Finally I jumped in late spring this year when I found a sale on them.
I wasn't sure how well I'd like it given that i have and enjoy traditional watches. What I've found is that I really don't take it off my wrist, except to charge or whilst in the shower.
I think how you intend to use it and wear are important considerations. Personally speaking, I wanted notification features and wanted a watch that I could wear whist being active more than I wanted a proper looking dress watch. The sport fit the bill for me just fine to get my feet wet and determine how much I'd enjoy it. At time of purchase and to this day, I covet the stainless silver case. Even with traditional watches, that's my go to.
The debate between Sapphire crystal vs XIon is much like traditional watches if my interpretations and research are accurate--please correct me if I'm wrong. Sapphire Crystal vs. Quartz. Quartz is generally going to be more impact resistant, but more prone to scratches. Sapphire, while being more scratch resistant is more prone to impact. It's a trade off I suppose.
This leads me to a question. Is it possible to pair more than one Watch with iPhone and keep the activity data consistent? Effectively merging the data between multiple Watches.
Thinking through the scenario of having one Watch for activity and general wear and one to wear for more formal settings. Can you tell Watch 3 has me thinking? lol
I'm also curious as to what the OP decided after the visit to Apple Store.
I wasn't sure how well I'd like it given that i have and enjoy traditional watches. What I've found is that I really don't take it off my wrist, except to charge or whilst in the shower.
I think how you intend to use it and wear are important considerations. Personally speaking, I wanted notification features and wanted a watch that I could wear whist being active more than I wanted a proper looking dress watch. The sport fit the bill for me just fine to get my feet wet and determine how much I'd enjoy it. At time of purchase and to this day, I covet the stainless silver case. Even with traditional watches, that's my go to.
The debate between Sapphire crystal vs XIon is much like traditional watches if my interpretations and research are accurate--please correct me if I'm wrong. Sapphire Crystal vs. Quartz. Quartz is generally going to be more impact resistant, but more prone to scratches. Sapphire, while being more scratch resistant is more prone to impact. It's a trade off I suppose.
This leads me to a question. Is it possible to pair more than one Watch with iPhone and keep the activity data consistent? Effectively merging the data between multiple Watches.
Thinking through the scenario of having one Watch for activity and general wear and one to wear for more formal settings. Can you tell Watch 3 has me thinking? lol
I'm also curious as to what the OP decided after the visit to Apple Store.
Xarthan
macrumors regular
Yup, I basically had three watches on my account when the series 3 came out and it sync'd all the data across the watches great. They even have this nifty feature that knows which watch you are wearing so the notifications, etc will go to the right one.
staggerlee41
macrumors 65816
Thanks for your feedback on this. It's great to know Apple considered these aspects when creating Watch and the OS. This is something I'll be giving consideration to going forward.