Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Amazon Developing Competitor to Apple TV Set-Top Box

DTphonehome said:
Apple is really dropping the ball by not allowing third party apps on the AppleTV. The space is wide open, and Amazon offers a great product with Prime. If they capitalize on that with a cheap set top box that allows apps, they can really own the space.
Apple has a great opportunity to change the whole industry with an app-enabled ATV. Video games, channel-specific streaming, etc. there's huge demand for this, and while I'm sure they're working on it, they can't wait forever.
Click to expand...

Baloney!

----------

"The box will compete with similar offerings like the Apple TV..."

What, like the Kindle "competes" with the iPad?
 
So is this going to be another Apple "killer" like the Kindle Fire was?
 
Aragornii said:
Have no idea why there is so much hate for the ATV over at Apple, going for years calling it a hobby, etc.
Click to expand...

There is no hate. It is a hobby. You gotta remember, no matter how vocal this crowd may sometimes be - this was (and in many ways still is) a very niche business. Typically a company like Apple wouldn't even be involved in such a product. The very fact that they have continued to even look at it, shows that they know there will be a market in the future.

Consider the aTV as a prospector laying claim. At the moment they are just keeping up appearances. Making sure that it has a story to tell (Integration with the rest of your Apple Products & Services more than anything)

Once they have found the appropriate interface to control a TV* in a living room setting, they will re-define what the aTV is and show the world what they have been working on.

When SJ says he cracked the TV, my guess is he was referring to the control mechanism; and that's fine if other people know that. They still have no idea what it may be.**

Karl P

* - I don't think that it exists yet, or at least in a useable form. Maybe for some reason it just can't exist yet

** - They may not even realize that what we currently have doesn't work well enough to be a player outside of a curious niche.
 
Rogifan said:
So is this going to be another Apple "killer" like the Kindle Fire was?
Click to expand...


Apples and oranges. How "smart" does a set top box have to be. If the Amazon box has a decent UI and accesses Amazon's movie/tv library - and it's "cheap" - that's all they need. They don't need to "kill" anything.
 
samcraig said:
Is that a customer concern? Or a stockholder concern?
Click to expand...

I suppose its both, if you're a customer that's some how invested in AMZN. It still blows my mind that Apple can make in one quarter more profit than Amazon has made in its entire existence.
 
samcraig said:
Actually - I wonder if they would offer the box free to prime members as an incentive to sign up
Click to expand...

Good point! That would bring extra pressure on Netflix which I think is the real competition for Amazon Prime (at least for a while).
 
rhett7660 said:
I am guessing everything is being devoted to the iPhone/iPad teams and products.

I agree 100% with your statement. This box could do so much more!!!
Click to expand...

that really is quite pathetic considering apples size. and lets not fool ourselves into thinking that something revolutionary happens every year with the different sized touch device.

apple is so much on its heels its embarrassing
 
DTphonehome said:
Apple is really dropping the ball by not allowing third party apps on the AppleTV. The space is wide open, and Amazon offers a great product with Prime. If they capitalize on that with a cheap set top box that allows apps, they can really own the space.
Apple has a great opportunity to change the whole industry with an app-enabled ATV. Video games, channel-specific streaming, etc. there's huge demand for this, and while I'm sure they're working on it, they can't wait forever.
Click to expand...

airplay, a feature that amazon instant video disables in their app
 
Apple should buy netflix and then take care of the live tv sports/news stuff and they will be golden. netflix is already experiencing a slight decline in its market as people just share their username and password with everyone. Apple is obviously better at preventing this then netflix and would make perfect sense with that mound of cash sitting in apples hand.
 
samcraig said:
Apples and oranges. How "smart" does a set top box have to be. If the Amazon box has a decent UI and accesses Amazon's movie/tv library - and it's "cheap" - that's all they need. They don't need to "kill" anything.
Click to expand...

Guess I should have used a /s tag. These days every product rumor from another company is called an Apple [insert product name here] killer. I mean no other reason for this to be front page news on MR is there?
 
Rogifan said:
I suppose its both, if you're a customer that's some how invested in AMZN. It still blows my mind that Apple can make in one quarter more profit than Amazon has made in its entire existence.
Click to expand...

If I'm a customer - I don't care whether or not Amazon is making a profit on a device they are selling me as long as the device I am buying works as promised and is worth what I am paying for it (value/bargain).

If I am a stockholder - of course I care about profit margins.

I'm just trying to understand the comment made. Was it snarky as a dig on Amazon's hardware model - or a genuine question. Because again - as a customer - I'm not sure why I would concern myself with Amazon's bottom line.

Whatever they will charge for the device won't really concern me with "lifetime" of usage. It's not like Amazon will release the box and then be out of business a few months later. Buying "into" their ecosystem isn't much of a risk.
 
samcraig said:
Apples and oranges. How "smart" does a set top box have to be. If the Amazon box has a decent UI and accesses Amazon's movie/tv library - and it's "cheap" - that's all they need. They don't need to "kill" anything.
Click to expand...


if all it does is amazon instant video, then its a major fail
 
also Roku competitor. Among many others. No one wants more set top boxes.
 
Rogifan said:
Guess I should have used a /s tag. These days every product rumor from another company is called an Apple [insert product name here] killer. I mean no other reason for this to be front page news on MR is there?
Click to expand...

I would agree with that. There's a lot of link/post bait on this site - more than from what I remember a few years back. Then again - competition is greater.

alent1234 said:
if all it does is amazon instant video, then its a major fail
Click to expand...

Never said that's all it would do. And if that IS all it did but was offered free with prime membership - I think it could still be successful as a means to stream movies/tv shows to a TV that isn't "connected" of which there are millions out there.

I guess we'll see what is released when it's released. Until then - I guess we'll read a lot of posts about "fail" or the like. Silly nonsense if you ask me.
 
DTphonehome said:
Exactly. They make tiny little tweaks here and there, but it's not much different than when it first came out. I bet they're hesitant because of poor interface via remote, but everyone has a smartphone now, and if you integrate siri, you can eliminate a lot of typing/searching. Apple is giving everyone else a huge opening.
Click to expand...

The good news is that is works with a bluetooth keyboard now, so makes navigation and searching waaayyyy better.

One of the main things I was looking for in a new tv was amazon instant video. Kind of works out that panasonic makes the best plasmas and has it built in.
 
Rogifan said:
I suppose its both, if you're a customer that's some how invested in AMZN. It still blows my mind that Apple can make in one quarter more profit than Amazon has made in its entire existence.
Click to expand...

Give it a decade or so.

They are slowly killing their competition*

While I agree that Amazon has a crazy valuation, the reality is they are in the process of building a "legal monopoly" the likes of which we may have never seen before.

Once Amazon has built enough infrastructure and made enough deals (all while running on savagely thin margins) they will have legally suffocated* a good portion of the market. Once that happens they can get down the business of making money.

Lots. Of. Money.

With no effective competition and the cost of trying to compete coming with an astronomical** start up price to even take a (statistically dangerous) stab at it, Amazon will be able to charge what they or their shareholders want.

Not saying this will end up happening, but that's the long game - and the one which Wall St is very, highly interested in.

Karl P


* If not by shutting them down outright, then by using market pressure to force them to succumb to use amazon for payment processing, distribution or even their IT infrastructure.

** Billions upon Billions upon Billions
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back