But doesn't Amazon help create jobs as they have to have people maintain these stores, developed the technology, R&D jobs, construction jobs to built these places etc...? Not being a smartass but seriously asking.
Think whatever you want. If I'm going to a physical store I want an actual person working there. Otherwise I'd just order online. Thankfully I don't think anything like this has much chance of showing up where I live in the foreseeable future.LOL, you most certainly will not and we all know that. You'll get your groceries from the most convenient place at the time. Just like everyone else.
And when businesses do things like this I'll take my money to their competitors who actually employ real people and pay them a living wage.
Same here. I use an ATM once or twice a year, and I use a teller about the same.Usually if I need cash I get cash back at the grocery store, by I go into the bank at least as often as I use the ATM if not more.
The unreal has a way of becoming commonplace.but Amazon Go just seem to unreal at this moment.
And if entry level jobs go away how are people supposed to get work experience, working for free in internships? Even if we are somehow able to create enough non service sector jobs for everyone what employer will hire someone who is fresh out of college and has no experience even having to show up on time for a job?Less meaningless jobs.
And if entry level jobs go away how are people supposed to get work experience, working for free in internships? Even if we are somehow able to create enough non service sector jobs for everyone what employer will hire someone who is fresh out of college and has no experience even having to show up on time for a job?
many are now calling for a "universal basic income" (UBI)—where the state gives everyone enough to live on. This would put a floor under the class of people we're calling the "precariat," people for whom work doesn't lead to increased financial security. It would free us from the ********, allowing everyone to benefit from automation, not just the lucky few. And it would leave us more time for creative, fulfilling things, enjoying the "abundance" that new technology affords (think how useful and cheap computers are today and imagine what they might let everyone do in the future).
we need to move towards a "postcapitalist" economy, where working for money loses its centrality, where goods, information, and intellectual property are shared, and where economic actors collaborate in new ways, whether it's credit union-type financial institutions or co-operative-type retailers.
we should socialize aspects of the finance industry (to stop it from taking all the profits while leaving society with bail-out bills), socialize information (so Google and Facebook don't enjoy information asymmetry), encourage collaborative work and nonprofits, and nationalize utilities. In Mason's economy, we would "privilege the free Wi-Fi network in the mountain village over the rights of the telecoms monopoly."
A basic income is a way to spread the rewards of work across socially useful activities, only some of which are currently rewarded, economically speaking. "A basic income says, in effect, there are too few work hours to go around, so we need to inject liquidity into the mechanism that allocates them
I'd definitely be open to that idea, but I don't see it working well with human nature.That's when working society have to change as well.
Envision a society where machines do most of the work, leaving people free to do what they want to do instead of being bogged down with mundane, soul-crushing, mindless work. The government would give everyone a livable income.
http://www.fastcoexist.com/3056483/welcome-to-the-post-work-economy
I'm glad you guys have low gas prices, but comparing your gas prices to other states is comparing apples to oranges. Within your state, if there was option between full-service and self-service, the latter would be cheaper. And consumers deserve a choice.And yet we pay less for gas than many states, go figure!
As a matter of fact, we paid less than much of the country before our moron governor implemented a 23 cent gas tax a couple of months ago. But we're still not the most expensive and still cheaper than other states that don't have mandatory full service.
Impact on jobs shouldn't be that different from the self-checkouts that more and more stores are already deploying. Of course, people will still be required to maintain the stores.
Agreed.
Delivery drivers will still be needed. Merchandisers will still be needed. Stockroom staff will still be needed. Customer service staff will still be needed (which cashiers can easily take over)
Custodial staff will still be needed. IT help will definitely be needed.
And when businesses do things like this I'll take my money to their competitors who actually employ real people and pay them a living wage.
Delivery drivers = drones and automated cars can replace them in the future
Merchandisers and item stocking = robots can be programmed to do that (it's menial work)
Custodial staff = you can program a robot to clean toilets, clean up in Aisle #12
IT staff…. yeah, you still need a few IT experts and software engineers to make it all happen
IBM beat Amazon to it years ago.
I'm still waiting for THIS supermarket:
(old AT&T video snipped)
Exactly! And since most products have those stupid magnetized security sensors hidden in them anyway, why not just put RFID tags on/in everything so you can use it for checkout AND security?Now THAT concept made sense: instantly scanning every item in a cart only at checkout, instead of watching you all the time you're in the store, to see what you pick up or put down.
KISS principle at work.