Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What's to stop any of these publishers to release a free App for their magazine, and then make them subscribe via Credit Card to access the content? Other apps do this, like the Sirius radio App, and I would imagine it would be a way to get around the 70/30 split.

The Zinio App comes to mind. You subscribe to magazines directly from them.
 
I'm an app developer and I'm pretty sure I get 60-40. I think all of the AppStore's pricing is standard between categories so it sounds like Amazon are actually undercutting Apple.

No, your deal is the same 70/30 as everyone else who sells apps on the App Store.
 
I don't believe it's got anything to do with Apple.

A 70/30 split is pretty common in business. I can't imagine that Apple are the first people to draw up a contract with that sort of sharing, and they wont be the last. People on this site are far too quick to assume ideas are the property of Apple.

Arn is seriously clutching at straws here to pass this off as 'Apple' news.

Can't disagree there. Although, I think it goes to highlight how much of an influence Apple has on the overall digital publishing/delivery market, so I don't mind this bit of fodder. (Plus, my CNBC app showed this article as the latest AAPL-related news too.)
 
No, your deal is the same 70/30 as everyone else who sells apps on the App Store.

Much to my surprise Apple's pricing structure is not standard. My app is tier 7 which equates to the following:

$6.99 proceeds $4.90 = 70%
£3.99 proceeds £2.43 = 60%
€5.49 proceeds €3.34 = 60%
$8.99 (Aus) proceeds $5.72 = 64%
¥800 proceeds ¥560 = 70%
 
Wow, just wow. As soon as Apple does it everyone else does it. I guess if Apple did 50/50 split Amazon would've copied that too.

Surely ye jest. Apple is not the trendsetter you want to think it is.
 
I don't believe it's got anything to do with Apple.

A 70/30 split is pretty common in business. I can't imagine that Apple are the first people to draw up a contract with that sort of sharing, and they wont be the last. People on this site are far too quick to assume ideas are the property of Apple.

Arn is seriously clutching at straws here to pass this off as 'Apple' news.

Are you kifdding? Apple was the first to come up with such split :D
 
Much to my surprise Apple's pricing structure is not standard. My app is tier 7 which equates to the following:

$6.99 proceeds $4.90 = 70%
£3.99 proceeds £2.43 = 60%
€5.49 proceeds €3.34 = 60%
$8.99 (Aus) proceeds $5.72 = 64%
¥800 proceeds ¥560 = 70%

You answered why by showing the currencies. Apple is still only taking 30% for their services, and they're taking care of additional taxes for you so that you don't have to report & pay taxes on your App Store sales. (Of course by this I mean sales tax/VAT only, not income taxes which you still have to account for yourself - there is a difference.)

http://www.shapehq.com/blog/app-store-revenue-split-clarification
 
Much to my surprise Apple's pricing structure is not standard. My app is tier 7 which equates to the following:

$6.99 proceeds $4.90 = 70%
£3.99 proceeds £2.43 = 60%
€5.49 proceeds €3.34 = 60%
$8.99 (Aus) proceeds $5.72 = 64%
¥800 proceeds ¥560 = 70%

You answered why by showing the currencies. Apple is still only taking 30% for their services, and they're taking care of additional taxes for you so that you don't have to report & pay taxes on your App Store sales. (Of course by this I mean sales tax/VAT only, not income taxes which you still have to account for yourself - there is a difference.)

Right. In Australia we have a 10% GST that goes to the government. So the ex-GST price of your $8.99 app is actually $8.17. $5.72 is 70% of that.
 
Why are publishers failing to save themselves?

Its unbelievable to me that publishers fail to jump at this chance from Apple to save their industry. Apple is the one company that has shown the ability to convince millions of users to part with micropayments for content. It does this by running an honest and transparent service, something almost every other company has shown a complete inability to do.

No, I don't work for Apple. I am simply a software developer who has seen a hundred other models fail where the app store has succeeded.

As an app developer for the iPhone, I can honestly say that Apple's 70% revenue split for developers and publishers is more than fair. For their 30%, Apple handles all the billing and distribution issues in 70 countries, they create an environment that makes buyers confident and happy, they provide access to the tens of millions of potential customers who have already trusted Apple with their credit card information, and they even run expensive TV advertising for the app store. I can't believe how newspapers have taken their industry down a failing path and seem to be ignoring this chance to save themselves. They should be asking Apple to PLEASE design a beautiful reader for their content and let them into the app store!

As an avid believer in the importance of the press to our society, it pains me to see newspapers try to go it alone, as it is simply not even remotely their area of competency.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.