Vudu/Ultraviolet?
All I want is an Ultraviolet service like Vudu on my Apple TV and I'd be set.
All I want is an Ultraviolet service like Vudu on my Apple TV and I'd be set.
No offense intended, but please read my last sentence a bit better. I clearly indicate that with Netflix on Apple TV, Apple is now following a new path.
And your post is really difficult to read without interpunction, let alone understand. Please write a coherent question, because I have got no clue what you are trying to ask me here..
Here, here!
so is the Amazon TV device going to support iTunes? nope....because theyre direct competitors and it'd be like McDonald's serving Whoppers.
Lifetime banning of people's accounts over petty issues with ZERO prior warning? The ban includes previously purchased Digital Content because the morons use ONE Uniformed account for EVERYTHING and ALL services.
I'm not against them banning accounts, I freely admit that I return a lot of stuff, but I also purchased a HELL of a lot more, what I object to is the idea that they did it without providing any kind of warning or grace period and that it f'ed over all my digital content AND bricked 2 Kindles. If they are going to exercise this policy then they damn well should have it clearly spelled out on their site and give people warnings as well.
I'd really hate to see Apple lose the web TV box race.
You should probably do some research into their crappy worker policies and their even crappier scorched earth policies when it comes to eliminating local competition and skirting around local laws.
Like I said, rational people that do research into these things know better.
Happy?
http://blog.seattlepi.com/trevorgriffey/2011/04/03/top-10-reasons-to-avoid-amazon-com/
http://www.thenation.com/article/37484/trouble-amazon#
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon.com_controversies
http://www.theguardian.com/technolo...azon-insider-feature-treatment-employees-work
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/05/business/workers-of-amazon-divergent.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
It's "Hear, Hear!" as in "Hear this", not "Here, here"
(one of my pet peeves)
Just as iOS and Android need each other.
they banned my account with no warnings or notice and screwed over all my DIGITAL PURCHASES and bricked two kindles in the process. F them, even if you think your account would never get banned I want everyone to take note that they have the ability to mess you up real badly and what's worse screw over digital content that you supposedly OWN over issues that have no relationship to the digital purchases. Other than that, yeah, great idea, the market is screaming for yet another set top streaming media box.
Amazon is a great company for those of us who do not abuse and misuse their return policies.
Buying more than you return (lol) does not make you some kind of uber customer. Returns have a significant cost. Margins on most items are such that you would have to buy a massive number of items to offset abuse of their return policies. If you were spending 250k a year and abusing the return system that is one thing. If you are spending 5k a year and abusing the return system you are a bad customer.
You know what you were doing and why they banned you. No sympathy for you at all. It is people like you who ultimately cause companies to enact more stringent policies that don't favor consumers.
Forget the 1st gen. But, gen 2 and 3, come on! Same crappy interface and no App store. Roku's interface looks much better and I can add channels I want.
Pretty simple - Right Amazon does but Apple generally doesn't. Since AppleTV is NOT open currently and Amazon has to negotiate with Apple to get their app on AppleTV. The likelihood goes WAY down if Amazon releases their own competing device.
Now if Apple does open up AppleTV then I would fully expect Amazon to release an app for it.
I'd really hate to see Apple lose the web TV box race.
Since Apple have repeatedly said that the Apple TV is "just a hobby", it's safe to say that they are not really in this race.
It will be much more interesting to observe the products from companies who take this market seriously: Amazon, Microsoft (Xbox One), just to name the big players who are already shipping real products - and not just publishing their "hobbies".
Last May Tim Cook said Apple TV sales had surpassed 13 million. How is that not shipping a real product? Based on 9to5Mac's recent reporting it's pretty much a guarantee we'll see a revamped Apple TV this year. My guess is it will be announced at WWDC, especially if it gets an SDK.
It's an eggcorn to replace the words in such a way. It isn't a sign of illiteracy, poor spelling, or poor grammar when these occur... But imaginative ways to convey something that has been heard into the lexicon in their own way... And when that happens, "wallah," you have a word that conveys the same message (voila)... "Supposebly" this occurs frequently enough someone coined a term for it to describe the occurrences and try to define their usefulness.
It's an eggcorn to replace the words in such a way. It isn't a sign of illiteracy, poor spelling, or poor grammar when these occur... But imaginative ways to convey something that has been heard into the lexicon in their own way... And when that happens, "wallah," you have a word that conveys the same message (voila)... "Supposebly" this occurs frequently enough someone coined a term for it to describe the occurrences and try to define their usefulness.
No, actually, it's called not speaking (or rather, writing) the English language properly.
Glass houses … stones … etc.
No; it's actually called speaking (or, rather, writing) the English language improperly.
If you are going to put yourself out there, make sure your own nose is clean.
Actually both sentences mean the same thing and what I wrote is NOT grammatically incorrect. My nose is more than clean.
"Not speaking properly" is the same as "speaking improperly"
Lol. I am a huge fan of Wikipedia but the first part of that page is absurd. No cites and biased attacks that seem to exist because a third party sold reprinted Wikipedia articles through amazon.
I tried to drudge through the guardian article but it was bad writing that was just leading to complaints by someone who never had to work a real job in their life. It did not point to any systematic mistreatment of employees. It simply points out that warehouse picking jobs generally suck and the pay is not great. There are not exceptions to this out there.
These are reporters trying to write something based on a pitch meeting and a deadline not based on expected or reported workplace atrocities needing further investigation.
I find it very satisfying. It's just as good as Netflix IMO and better than hulu plus.
Hmm. I'm sure Amazon brass never thought about that. Sure did stop the Kindle in its tracks![]()