Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Amazon Prime - Airplay to Apple TV quality good?
- Thread starter dmk1974
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Incorrect. The Airplay SDK is feature complete and made available by Apple for third party developers to use, and they can choose how they wish to implement it in their apps.
This is explicitly explained in the developer documentation linked to earlier in this thread.
If Amazon is choosing not to implement the handing off of the url of the content by the iDevice to the ATV then that is a concious choice on the part pf Amazon, not a technical limitation imposed by Apple on the SDK.
Can you point me to the specific document on this page that explains it? I didn't find it.
Well, as already mentioned it's not as simple as just handing off a URL.
From the developer documentation link in this thread here:
So you see, it is actually as simple as handing off the url to the stream to the ATV - it is all built into the API.
Also from the same page, the warning about how streaming will be cut off if you try to use any other multimedia functions on the same iDevice while Airplaying to the ATV:
----------
Nope. But as mentioned, it appears their iOS app is allowing AirPlay to the ATV. Can't verify though as I'm outside of the US.
Thanks.
Well, it wouldn't work for content offered by the company I work for, since we use a different (more secure) authentication scheme which does not allow authentication with URL-embedded credentials. But yeah, I see how it can work for some services that use a setup like this.
I don't have one but did some research before buying a family member a Roku for Xmas. I really think Apple should allow Amaxon to have a Prime channel on the ATV. In my opinion that's the ATV's biggest weakness and a good reason to delay buying one. Netflix competes with iTunes yet Apple lets them on the ATV. Amazon has a huge library with some exclusive content that you shouldn't have to use a workaround to get on your TV.
Don't believe so.
When it comes to content such as movies and tv shows. Everything has to be negotiated with the owners of that content. So it's really not as easy to just put amazon prime on ATV.
When it comes to device that attaches to a tv, Hollywood seems to have a different criteria than mobile devices.
It does. The iPhone will only download in SD. The iPads will do HD, depending on your internet connection.
Since Amazon is so protective about you using there crappy Kindle Fires as I bought one and returned it 4 days later as it was horrible and got a Nexus 7 from Amazon 
which was way better. But wait they only allow Amazon Instant on the Kindle not the Nexus 7 so no Chromecast support.
Really if you are serious about Amazon Instant then the only cheap solution is to get a Roku. I have a Roku 3 that I use for Amazon Instant and it works good.
which was way better. But wait they only allow Amazon Instant on the Kindle not the Nexus 7 so no Chromecast support.Really if you are serious about Amazon Instant then the only cheap solution is to get a Roku. I have a Roku 3 that I use for Amazon Instant and it works good.
Well, I wound up connecting a Roku 2 to the TV that already has an Apple TV and TiVo Mini. The sole purpose of the Roku is for Amazon Prime (which looks great). To me, aside from Amazon Prime, that Roku kinda sucks. HBO Go doesn't work with Comcast/Xfinity on the Roku (at least great on my Apple TV). Nexflix on the Roku 2 doesn't support profiles (also great on my Apple TV). ESPN app is ok, but already have it on Apple TV. Aside from Amazon Prime, I haven't found the Roku to be too impressive.
And iPad 2 was better than iPad 1 and so on and so on. What's your point? Suggesting that I spend $90 just to watch Amazon Prime when I already have an Apple TV???
You said you were unimpressed by the roku 2. Just letting you know the 3 is heads and shoulders above the 2. Even die hard Apple TV fans here will tell you it's UI beats the current Apple TV.
If have both. The only significant difference that I can see is that the menu navigation is more fluid on the 3. But otherwise, the 2 runs all the channels just fine. IMO upgrading is not worth it unless you want the headphone jack in the remote.
Personally, I like the UIs of some of the apps better on the ATV (primarily the Hulu app).
Don't bother with the Roku 1, 2. They are just re-branded older versions with slower processors. Pay a bit more and get the Roku 3 which will end up getting all the newest features.
It depends on your network. If you have an N class router or better and good signal strength, AirPlay results are very good. On a B or G network however, it might not be as acceptable. Either case though, your end video result will be limited to 720p. (which is all you would get with an Apple TV 2 anyway.)
What makes you think that it's Apple preventing Amazon, when you see Amazon removing both chromecast, and appletv from their store?
You're quoting a post made long before Amazon's decision not to sell the new ATV.
Anyway it's no secret that Apple uses content to drive hardware sales, and Amazon uses hardware / software (eg Kindles) to drive sales of content. Both companies are happy if you buy a new iPad and use it to buy books on the Kindle app. Apple doesn't have to sell you the book and Amazon doesn't have to sell you a Kindle tablet. Both companies still win. I don't understand why video is fundamentally different.
I have the Amazon Fire TV set-top box. It's superb. It looks great -- it could easily have been designed by Apple. The user-interface is simple and elegant. And it just works. It cleverly pre-downloads things it thinks you're going to play so that there's no delay and the video starts immediately.
The only drawback is that it doesn't have a Now TV app or All4 app.
The only drawback is that it doesn't have a Now TV app or All4 app.