Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Heh? Prior to the apps, you used to get the software for free (when you buy the box, you had the right to download the software). It wasn't until iDevices that sling started charging anyone for their software.

The Slingplayer software was only free for the desktop. For mobile devices, it was always around $30. (There were trial versions as well, and some boxes on sale might've come with a coupon. Perhaps you had one of those?)

The good news was that you could buy a player license and transfer it as many times as you wished. I started using Slingplayer on one old Windows Mobile phone and upgraded to new phones several times over the years.... and just kept using the same license code. (When you activated the player on the new phone, it registered it with SlingMedia, and the old one stopped working.)

I did have to buy a separate version for a non-touchscreen Windows Mobile phone which had no carrier plan. That's the device I used around the house and yard over WiFi as a handheld TV.
 
Since there have been over 200 million iOS devices sold, Amazon (and others) have the potential to reach a far greater audience. This is all possible because of the platform that Apple built. Why then, should Amazon be allowed to profit on this platform without paying "rent"?

Because Apple don't want their customers to have this experience: "Wow! This is so much easier on Android!" :)

MacSmurf had this right on the first page. Here is my more elaborated take:

If all the 3rd party app developers drop in-app purchasing, effectively boycotting Apple, it will only hurt Apple in the long run. Competitors' devices will offer these features and customers will ultimately "switch". If the folks at Apple are as canny as they believe they are, they will have no choice but to drop the 30% surcharge on in-app purchasing. The more likely scenario will be a smaller cut than the ridiculous 30% they are now charging.
 
Apple Should Re-Think This Policy

I haven't read all of the comments on this latest policy change by Apple, so perhaps I have missed a critical piece of the 'logic' applied but for me it can all be summed up to yet another unnecessary inconvenience laid upon the users by Apple. Don't get me wrong, I love Apple and their products; the iPad is truly a revolutionary and game- changing device. But, as with so many other decisions reached by Apple their 'thinking' is arrogant, completly self-serving, and just plain wrong headed. I' m sure that reasonable and defendable points can be produced by any party invested in this discussion but for me, the end user and consumer of the technology, my life just became a little less convenient. Now, when I am shopping for books in my Kindle app on my iPad i can't just press a button and go directly into the store to browse for books, I have to switch screens press a few more buttons and wait. Why?

Apple makes some of the greatest and most innovative products that you can buy today; I salute them for their innovation and their drive to produce and provide us with the neatest and most cool devices and software on the planet, but their arrogance and self-centered thinking is pathetic.

And lets not even go to the FlashPlayer issue....

Apple, wake-up! Don't ruin a great idea with your petty and arrogant policies.

Does anyone that matters at Apple read this stuff?
 
If the folks at Apple are as canny as they believe they are, they will have no choice but to drop the 30% surcharge on in-app purchasing. The more likely scenario will be a smaller cut than the ridiculous 30% they are now charging.

You were right until this point. Apple won't have to drop the 30% surcharge, but they will have to allow 3rd party IAP systems and payment processors. That's the logical next step, make their own service optional and if not used, a developer doesn't have to cripple its application.

Amazon would be happy to use itself as a payment processor, they already have a huge infrastructure in place for all their wares. Why give up 30% to Apple to implement IAP on Kindle for iOS ? Just treat it as a second rate citizen if that's what Apple wants.

However, if Apple was to again relax the rules, Amazon could implement it through a webapp on their site, the app offering it either via a link to safari or through a UIWebView. Then "It just works! on Android" becomes moot again.

Same for all others. It doesn't matter that Apple's service or a 3rd party one is used, what matters if that the iOS apps have the same level of functionality.
 
Sales pitch for Iphone

Apple uses the premise of apps to sell it phones which it makes money from. The apps are not developed or paid for by apple. The apps are provided either free of charge or we buy them, either way it helps apple to sell its phones which is revenue to apple.

Apple is no longer a little beaten down company and in my opinion is behaving worse than microsoft, they charge like wounded bulls, control what you can and can't put on the phone and now after companies have invested money i.e. amazon, apple wants to squeeze every drop of blood out of them, I realise its business, but we the apple users are getting the raw deal. I didn't buy an apple phone so I would have to go and manually open safari to get a book, this isn't ease of use, I could have done that without apps.

My next phone will not be an apple, I will purchase a phone where I can have any reader program, any app I choose and not be dictated to by apple. My last phone was a Jazz Jam and was a dream for me, I had mobipocket on it and could read any book from any store, ease of use, I loved it. Why is it when microsoft tried similar stuff we went up in arms but apple has being doing this sneakily for some time and they go under the radar. Just remember apple when microsoft did this they became the hackers fantasy, you are setting yourselves up and are on the same path. Ibooks in Australia is pathetic and so expensive I may as well go and buy the paper book, amazon was ease of use and now thats altered. I hate this with a vengeance.

In the end apple users will speak with their money, some android phones are just as good, I am now a very unhappy apple customer, and frankly I speak to many more who feel the same way.:(
 
Not so many

My next phone will not be an apple....

In the end apple users will speak with their money, some android phones are just as good, I am now a very unhappy apple customer, and frankly I speak to many more who feel the same way.:(


Not so many, if you believe the surveys: Nearly all iPhone users replace their iPhone with an iPhone. Fewer than half of Android users replace their Androids with Android.

One recent poll:
http://www.appleinsider.com/article...buyers_are_waiting_for_apples_next_model.html
 
In the end apple users will speak with their money, some android phones are just as good, I am now a very unhappy apple customer, and frankly I speak to many more who feel the same way.:(
Ha, no. Drop the iPhone over one app? No. I'll buy a Kindle if I feel strongly enough, but I'm not getting rid of an entire device that I otherwise love, and an ecosystem that works perfectly well otherwise - not to mention all the apps, videos, and music that "just works" with it. No. If I care that much about losing a button that points me to the Kindle store (that I can easily find on the Amazon site) then I'll just buy a Kindle - which I may very well do. Apple IS wrong here, this is a stupid move because things like the Kindle app actually drive people TO their devices, but it won't drive me away. That's just ridiculous.
 
Funny this is still generating comments. I read on my Kindle app every night and frankly have not even noticed anything has changed on the app. Some of us never bought our books through the app in the first place. I prefer to buy them on my computer using the full Amazon site but I could just as easily buy them with the Amazon shopping app if I wanted to. Sure Apple didn't need to do this but I just don't see the big deal. :confused:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.