MacNeXT said:While I don't want to discourage criticism, I don't give much credit to this Bill Palmer figure. First he was ABSOLUTELY SURE that the headless mac rumour was FAKE, because, according to him, it was an incredibly dumb thing for Apple to do. Then when it turned out to be true, he put up a very long rant on why he was disappointed and a lot of reasons why it would fail, and now he tries something like this.
I don't understand how someone can put so much negative energy into something that 1. He doesn't have to buy and 2. A lot of people are very happy about. He sounds like a very frustrated guy.
madmaxmedia said:Some suggestions are not bad, such as having low priced CRT (or LCD) options in the Apple stores. For LCD's, just small 15" models that don't compete with the Apple displays. They wouldn't take up too much space and don't weigh a ton.
You need to cut costs on the eMac in order to lower its price? Then consider making moves such as downgrading the 5400 RPM hard drive in the eMac to match the 4200 RPM hard drive in the Mac Mini. If 4200 RPM is fast enough for the Mini, then it's fast enough for the eMac.
gwangung said:Apple's margins of 25-30% are NORMAL (not fat!).
kingjr3 said:Dear Bill Palmer,
Please refund my 3 minutes for reading that crap you consider a legitimate gripe with Apple.
Sincerely,
kingjr3
PS. My pc only has 2 USB ports. Damn crappy IBM laptop...
DanTheMan said:...I like using a two button mouse with scroll wheel contrary to what Steve Jobs thinks
In their quarterly financial statements. It's a very significant number for any manufacturer. Just for comparison, Sun Microsystems, considered to be in the dumps the last 3 years, has a +40% margin, regularly. People point to Apple's margin because they are comparing them to Dell. Dell has *much* higher volume on *much* lower margin and, for all intents and purposes, no R&D. Dell doesn't innovate, they manufacture, period. I think Apple is right where they need to be.Chip NoVaMac said:I keep hearing people mention this, where is this info from Apple directly?
Chubypig said:I think what everyone (critics included) must remember is that this is a BUDGET machine.
daveL said:People point to Apple's margin because they are comparing them to Dell. Dell has *much* higher volume on *much* lower margin and, for all intents and purposes, no R&D. Dell doesn't innovate, they manufacture, period. I think Apple is right where they need to be.
cmvsm said:I hear people, mainly on this board, talking about these Dell monitors. They may be equivalent to the Apple's in screen quality, but man are they generic UGLY! If it were sitting on a shelf full of other Viewsonics, Sony's, Samsungs, etc, I never could tell the difference between any of them. If you are going to spend cash on an LCD, get the whole package...quality and asthetics. Hopefully the quality and resale on the Dell monitors are better than their computers. But then again, that's another story.