OK, any sportbike fans out there like myself? A few in the back? You car guys can relate too but I just hit on this as a good analogy:
Macs and Wintel boxes are like sportbikes.
1) Both have different classes
2) Both have a speed myth idealogy/myth to deal with
3) Both suffer instantly from bad-press
4) The real-world difference boil-down to preference.
I know this all may be a bit out-there but the analogy can be explained further.
Anyone who reads one of the top motorcycles magazines immeadiately recognize that nearly every year the "new" bike gets a nod over it's predecessors. The example that is very handy to this argument this year is the Yamaha R1 vs. the GSX-R 1000. Now. Like an Intel processor based machine, the GSX-R has a bit more power than the R1. However, Yamaha completely redesigned the entire bike this year with the focus being an overall improvment rather than just giving it more power. In other words, the R1's handling, brakes, chassis, and ergos combined together to make a more complete whole.
In this way, the R1 is like a Mac. A Mac G4's subsystem componetry is general much higher grade than a competing Intel machines (in some cases they are exactly the same component, but no one will argue that the OS integrates better in the Wintel world). The G4 is a better machine in this way for is primary role - professional design/graphics/video work.
So, just because Intel machines have a slightly faster processor (yes, Mac should be using DDR - I will give that to the Wintel crowd) it does not mean that the current G4 is a substandard machine.
Having said all that, I, like every other Mac proponent have been eager waiting for the new systems and expect to see them this summer - even if only in preview mode.
Prediction? Expect mulit G4, be surprised by G5. DDR or better RAM up to 4GB. Gigawire, Bluetooth, 50 MBps+ Airport, new chassis that some will love and others hate...
Macs and Wintel boxes are like sportbikes.
1) Both have different classes
2) Both have a speed myth idealogy/myth to deal with
3) Both suffer instantly from bad-press
4) The real-world difference boil-down to preference.
I know this all may be a bit out-there but the analogy can be explained further.
Anyone who reads one of the top motorcycles magazines immeadiately recognize that nearly every year the "new" bike gets a nod over it's predecessors. The example that is very handy to this argument this year is the Yamaha R1 vs. the GSX-R 1000. Now. Like an Intel processor based machine, the GSX-R has a bit more power than the R1. However, Yamaha completely redesigned the entire bike this year with the focus being an overall improvment rather than just giving it more power. In other words, the R1's handling, brakes, chassis, and ergos combined together to make a more complete whole.
In this way, the R1 is like a Mac. A Mac G4's subsystem componetry is general much higher grade than a competing Intel machines (in some cases they are exactly the same component, but no one will argue that the OS integrates better in the Wintel world). The G4 is a better machine in this way for is primary role - professional design/graphics/video work.
So, just because Intel machines have a slightly faster processor (yes, Mac should be using DDR - I will give that to the Wintel crowd) it does not mean that the current G4 is a substandard machine.
Having said all that, I, like every other Mac proponent have been eager waiting for the new systems and expect to see them this summer - even if only in preview mode.
Prediction? Expect mulit G4, be surprised by G5. DDR or better RAM up to 4GB. Gigawire, Bluetooth, 50 MBps+ Airport, new chassis that some will love and others hate...