Doubtful as they would just keep pushing the ad's as that's the mentality now. Companies with good products sell themselves and dont need such shoddy tactics as their goods sell by word of mouth...
Q-6
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
And they wonder why people use an ad blocker???
- Thread starter romanof
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Q-6
What are examples of web content that you pay for right now? Not counting any video/music/etc streaming services.
You are much more tolerant than I am. One of the things AT&T did when destroying DirectTV was to replace the screensaver with ads for Pay Per View movies. Dropped it.
Time is precious. Why should women have to watch commercials for men specific products, or visa versa? Or baby products when the kids are gone? Or all of those pharmaceutical ads for diseases you don't have? That's what my doctor is for.
I pay for the NY Times (which annoyingly began hitting even its subscribers with ads) and am a subscriber at Ars Technica. I also regularly send money to NPR and Wikipedia. I pay to have the ads removed here (there used to be a much more active private community, but these days it's generally about removal of the ads). It all adds up to about $10/month. But I realize it's ultimately a losing battle.
If I pay and still see ad's I cancel and move on. Sooner people wake up the better, problem being most are comatose to such matters and meekly accept whatever is dished out to them...
Q-6
Yeah, I almost rage-quit the NYT right then and there when I first saw ads in the app. Part of the issue is that I'm paying for my in-laws to have it delivered to their house, which is even more upsetting because I'm paying these guys $500/year instead of the $50 I'd be paying for digital only. I absolutely agree with you in principle, but I think my situation illustrates that today's model is unsustainable. I don't think NYT is showing me ads to further line their pockets - I think they're in crisis mode.
Again, I don't know what the answer is. I'd pay more for an ad-free digital tier, but I'm not sure how much more, and I don't think today's market can sustain what it takes to employ actual journalists on purely an ad-free basis, and of course the ad-supported side just continues its slide into more obnoxiousness. It'd be interesting to know the financials behind MR - people talk about how obnoxious the ads and tracking are here (I pay the $25 to avoid it), and this is a very active site. I'd be surprised if arn is making much money at all once everyone is getting paid. If that's true it just goes to show that it's impossible to 'do it right' and still make any money, which is a shame.
I would like to recommend 1Blocker.
Yes, it is a small subscription and yes, it is only for Apple devices.
But it is an all in one. With a Firewall to block In-App-Trackers and a full-YouTube-Adblocker. And no problems with Apples private relay.
Using it for years.
Yes, it is a small subscription and yes, it is only for Apple devices.
But it is an all in one. With a Firewall to block In-App-Trackers and a full-YouTube-Adblocker. And no problems with Apples private relay.
Using it for years.
I use BitDefender on my Mac, PC, iPhone and iPad, its TrafficLight plugins on Safari and Chrome really keeps you locked down.
You need to take the rest of my reply into context.
By "fine" I mean I can deal with them/ignore them, accept them as a cost of free content hosting.
I don't like it but as someone who's seen the costs of hosting and bandwidth provision I can accept that ads are needed for free content.
But when they start stealing information, tracking me, being obnoxious with spawning pop-overs, pop under windows, etc. (i.e., today's reality) then sorry... I'm blocking it. And I do run ad blockers both on my edge firewall and my browsers.
Good grief, my ad blocker has stopped working on YouTube and it seems to be worse than free-to-air TV at this point!
- A 2-minute ad for what appeared to be a phone game
- A 15-second ad for dairy-free chocolate
- A 70-second ad for some sort of writing tablet.
That's a total of 3:25 before I could actually watch the video I wanted. I'm not interested in any of those products, and none of the ads were skippable. At least with TV the ads are short and have the potential of keeping your attention, but spending more than a minute slogging through the features of the game and tablet was enough to bore me silly.
- A 2-minute ad for what appeared to be a phone game
- A 15-second ad for dairy-free chocolate
- A 70-second ad for some sort of writing tablet.
That's a total of 3:25 before I could actually watch the video I wanted. I'm not interested in any of those products, and none of the ads were skippable. At least with TV the ads are short and have the potential of keeping your attention, but spending more than a minute slogging through the features of the game and tablet was enough to bore me silly.
Much as I hate google, I eventually paid for it.
I realised I spend more time watching YouTube both for work related educational content and hobbies/entertainment than I do Netflix, appletv, disney+, etc. - and I pay for them.
So I now pay for YouTube.
Same. I have stopped subscribing to Netflix, disney+ and Apple One and now pay only for YouTube premium. 😛
Would you say it's better than Wipr? I feel like Wipr is like an "Apple approach" as in "set-it-and-forget-it" type of thing, but there's no information anywhere about which lists it uses. I'm assuming it's a variant of EasyList, but who knows?
I want to use Private Relay but it NEVER works. Every network I join, even cellular, says "not supported". I don't know what's going on. I guess it could be NextDNS, but it's not set to block any Apple services.
This happened on my iPad when a link opened up a YouTube video in Safari...I couldn't skip the ad. I noticed I could skip the ad after five seconds if I turned off content blockers (from the address bar). It was the same ad both times too.
I tried this a few more times with other videos/ads and had the same results. Looks like YouTube is now making the ads non-skippable if they detect you're using an ad blocker.
Last edited: