Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I like it. Apples OS is a good choice - and the bigger Apple gets the more it gets regulated. No more proprietary Lightning and no more Wallet Garden with the DMA in reach.

Apple should change its mind and turn into a service company.

Think different!!

Gallery-Steve-Jobs-Think-different-von-bono01.424412.jpg
Turn into a service company? Easy to say, as this isn't your dime.

They should develop products people want to use and the government should stay out of what ports and sideloading. Let prople vote with their dollars, which apparently they are. The governments do not get that a product can actually be popular.
 
Would be nice to have another choice. We had already - at least nearly. 30% commission will be dust with the DMA.
Sounds like a good business opportunity for you. No? There aren't any legal barriers to entering the market. Financial barriers, maybe. But you can design your own ecosystem, create an app store that you host and pay for and let others sell their wares for free. It would be Nirvana.
 
I like it. Apples OS is a good choice - and the bigger Apple gets the more it gets regulated. No more proprietary Lightning and no more Wallet Garden with the DMA in reach.

Apple should change its mind and turn into a service company.

Think different!!

Gallery-Steve-Jobs-Think-different-von-bono01.424412.jpg
Think tyrannical.
 
Unfortunately it’s too late. Microsoft had a chance but blew it.

The other incumbents blew it too. There were mobile smartphone platforms before Apple and Google jumped into the ring.

Blackberry, Palm, Symbian, etc.
 
Turn into a service company? Easy to say, as this isn't your dime.

They should develop products people want to use and the government should stay out of what ports and sideloading. Let prople vote with their dollars, which apparently they are. The governments do not get that a product can actually be popular.

The government is very good at trying to fix what isn't broken.
 
I'm always more interested in Apple's American teen monopoly statistics. Was close to 90% last time I checked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mech986
For me it would we a great progress, if I would not be forced into an "ecosystem" bei either Apple and Google. Devices and software should both be things that you buy once and then you are not forced into any kind of connection with the manufacturer. Basically like buying a toaster. Or like buying a PC game in the good old times when those games did not establish any intertent connection with the software company. You bought the game in a physical store, installed it from the CD and the manufacturer would not even know that you bought it.

Today you can chose to either lose your freedom by getting caged into Apples's ecosystem or you lose your privacy with Android, which was just created by Google to gather data to deleiver targeted ads.

Both could easily be stopped by lawmakers. I have some hopes that lawmakers will force Apple to open up things like iMessage, which still has to use SMS to communicate with Android users and als stopp the insane data collection of Google, which uses every dirty trick and even lies to get new data.

How powerful Google is became visible when it stopped providing Android updates to Huawei phones because of US sanctions. That made it very hard for Huawei to sell phones in many parts of the world, although their phones are much better than Samsung phones in the same price range for example. The main losers were the customers.
 
The market has spoken. Developers aren’t willing to support a third OS.

And I look at the gaming market, where every gaming console more or less charges the standard 30%, so I am not sure what exactly competition is supposed to fix.
Agreed with most of your assessment, but in the gaming market, I count at least 4 major players that many/most developers are supporting: PlayStation, Xbox, PC, and Switch.
 
Agreed with most of your assessment, but in the gaming market, I count at least 4 major players that many/most developers are supporting: PlayStation, Xbox, PC, and Switch.

Hardware companies subsidize lots of game development. To launch a new phone architecture you'll pretty much have to do the same. Problem is that Microsoft tried that with last release of Windows phone and just got crapware.
 
For me it would we a great progress, if I would not be forced into an "ecosystem" bei either Apple and Google. Devices and software should both be things that you buy once and then you are not forced into any kind of connection with the manufacturer. Basically like buying a toaster. Or like buying a PC game in the good old times when those games did not establish any intertent connection with the software company. You bought the game in a physical store, installed it from the CD and the manufacturer would not even know that you bought it.

Today you can chose to either lose your freedom by getting caged into Apples's ecosystem or you lose your privacy with Android, which was just created by Google to gather data to deleiver targeted ads.

Both could easily be stopped by lawmakers. I have some hopes that lawmakers will force Apple to open up things like iMessage, which still has to use SMS to communicate with Android users and als stopp the insane data collection of Google, which uses every dirty trick and even lies to get new data.

How powerful Google is became visible when it stopped providing Android updates to Huawei phones because of US sanctions. That made it very hard for Huawei to sell phones in many parts of the world, although their phones are much better than Samsung phones in the same price range for example. The main losers were the customers.

You can still get a flip phone. Or a version of Android with google software removed. Anyone can fork android and build a phone entirely without Google's involvement, why aren't these phones selling?

Today even Toasters have over the air updates. OTAs aren't perfect but they are far better than having no way to fix a critical issue once hardware ships.

And iMessage is open, it uses SMS.
 
The data is very suspicious. In the last quarter, both Android and iOS market share dropped significantly, but no any other platforms increased their market shares accordingly.
 
I remember Steve Jobs was just trying to get 1% or 10 million units of the market share with their new iPhone. :rolleyes:

AED6F783-C80B-4EC8-8924-793FAB212CDB.jpeg

 
It's sad to see that there are only two real* competitors.


edit:
*I don't really consider Android's Vanilla vs Samsung One vs MIUI vs ... as a true competition unlike "old times" of iOS vs Android vs Windows Phone vs webOS vs ... with all the constant one-upmanship. But I guess it comes with the maturity of the platforms plus the immense costs of keeping up both technically and adoption/app-wise.
Stock Android is not even a contender as Google Pixel market share is actually very small. Majority of Android users around the world would never ever see stock Android. From front end perspective, it's between iOS, OneUI, ColorOS and MiUI. Since both ColorOS and MiUI are basically just trying to be iOS knock off, it's pretty much just between iOS and OneUI.
 
It said StockApps, and then the picture said source Statista, and Statsita doesn't have that actual stats....

And from the official number Apple and GSMA posted, those stats were wrong.
 
It said StockApps, and then the picture said source Statista, and Statsita doesn't have that actual stats....

And from the official number Apple and GSMA posted, those stats were wrong.

Eh... does it really matter?

Every three months we get estimates from a variety of external sources since companies don't have to disclose actual sales numbers. And the estimates fluctuate constantly.

But it's been basically Android 70% and iOS 30% in worldwide market share for a while.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.