Android phones need 6-8GB RAM? Why?
One version or another of this vision has existed since the 60s. I think the issue all along has been standards and interoperability. The issue has morphed of course, but in essence it is always the same.
As a consumer of this superconverged device, how do you shop for which system is best for you if not all "stations" will be compatible with your device? As a purchaser or operator of these "stations," how do you select which devices to support and in which categories.
We can't even get all the companies to agree on a which plug to use to supply basic power - let alone all the interfaces required for the type of "station" you're describing. It's not a unique issue, we can't agree on a charging standard for EVs either. Heck, most countries can't even agree on what type of fuel to use for cars or which type of plug to use for AC electricity.
And before someone chimes in the "USB," as the answer - it's not. Among many problems, USB as a standard setting organization has done a pretty poor job of it and is constantly fiddling with the standard to the point of where they can't get out of their own way. Further, how comfortable are you with letting the huge corporations in charge of the USB consortium own such an important standard?
The argument might also go that this reluctance to standardize is a good thing. Standards hinder innovation and discourage feature differentiation. It is a 100 times more difficult to disrupt an industry which has been standardized because there is almost no room through which to drive a wedge - if you're standard compliant then you can't stand out, if you stand out then people will be unwilling to stray from the standard.
So I think this vision for a "station" anyone can use and have all their files and apps on will continue to elude us until computation and computational power become a commodity like potatoes and we don't really care anymore. Probably not in our lifetimes.
Apple excels at creating this type of elegant closed system. They're so big now that I don't think standardization across all makers is as much of an issue as you make it out to be. The lightning connector, iTunes, App Store, etc are all standardized inside the garden walls and there are plenty of 3rd party vendors reaping profits. If Apple built this sort of thing the 3rd party monitor and input device manufacturers would continue to follow suit, because there are enough participants in the ecosystem to make it very profitable.
Because even with 4GB, and the 835 processor, my Samsung S8 stutters and lags more than I like. So I keep going back to my iPhone 7. (Galaxy S8 was a "curiosity buy" for me). The experience with iPhone 7 is smooth like a fluent flow, it just works, no matter which app I use. The S8 has frustrating hiccups.
That experience, with 2 gigs of RAM, really shows how polished iOS is, and the apps that run on it.
I'm eagerly waiting for the "iPhone 8", as the only thing I'd want from the S8 is the bigger screen in a smallish form factor. The 4.7" screen seems so tiny after using the S8. And about the curved edges? No thank you. It looks like a nice design, but the curves are not practical at all.
Steve viewed Andy not very favourably:
http://www.businessinsider.com/steve-jobs-on-android-founder-andy-rubin-big-arrogant-f-2013-11
I like the idea of titanium and logo-free clean design as well as his price target, but it's still Android inside.
More impressed by the echo competitor than the phone. Makes me wonder though where we go with smart phones once we've gone completely bezel free. I guess just spec bumps year after year? I guess it had to happen eventually, but for me the enthusiasm I once had for following this sector is fading fast and I don't think even Apple can pull something magical out of the bag anymore. I really hope I'm wrong though.
In my eyes, once we have just a screen, most phones will begin to resemble the exact same thing. It will all come down to software, core technologies (touch ID, 3D touch, chip development, AI, etc.), service, and support. I think Apple is in a great position here.
Because even with 4GB, and the 835 processor, my Samsung S8 stutters and lags more than I like. So I keep going back to my iPhone 7. (Galaxy S8 was a "curiosity buy" for me). The experience with iPhone 7 is smooth like a fluent flow, it just works, no matter which app I use. The S8 has frustrating hiccups.
That experience, with 2 gigs of RAM, really shows how polished iOS is, and the apps that run on it.
I'm eagerly waiting for the "iPhone 8", as the only thing I'd want from the S8 is the bigger screen in a smallish form factor. The 4.7" screen seems so tiny after using the S8. And about the curved edges? No thank you. It looks like a nice design, but the curves are not practical at all.
Android needs way more memory than iOS.Android phones need 6-8GB RAM? Why?
Foldable devices with responsive screens. Meaning they adjust their UI layout depending on how much of the screen is folded out. Devices that are both full blown 12" tablets and fold up to the size and thickness of an 5" iPhone...More impressed by the echo competitor than the phone. Makes me wonder though where we go with smart phones once we've gone completely bezel free. I guess just spec bumps year after year? I guess it had to happen eventually, but for me the enthusiasm I once had for following this sector is fading fast and I don't think even Apple can pull something magical out of the bag anymore. I really hope I'm wrong though.
That Essential Home is essentiallywhat I expect Apple to do for the Siri Speaker. Something between an AppleTV and a Google Home, using a circular display on the top just like that.
But Essentials seem to be going for the localized AI-like handling of tasks between devices and processing information. Google and Amazon want to do it in the cloud, but Andy seems to agree with Apple that this stuff is better done on the device itself.
Because even with 4GB, and the 835 processor, my Samsung S8 stutters and lags more than I like. So I keep going back to my iPhone 7. (Galaxy S8 was a "curiosity buy" for me). The experience with iPhone 7 is smooth like a fluent flow, it just works, no matter which app I use. The S8 has frustrating hiccups.
That experience, with 2 gigs of RAM, really shows how polished iOS is, and the apps that run on it.
I'm eagerly waiting for the "iPhone 8", as the only thing I'd want from the S8 is the bigger screen in a smallish form factor. The 4.7" screen seems so tiny after using the S8. And about the curved edges? No thank you. It looks like a nice design, but the curves are not practical at all.
I like the looks of it, especially the vanishingly thin bezels. But will it measure up performance-wise? Considering how crowded the smartphone market is, and how labor-and-research-intensive new entries to the available offerings are, at least if they are to offer a distinguishing user experience, you gotta hand it to Andy for even attempting.It's interesting and wish them all the best.
Doubt many people will buy it but it's always good when a company comes with fresh ideas.
Yes I also noticed this on the iPhone. At first I thought it was broken lol, then I looked up why scrolling is so slow and it seems that's the iPhone way. It would drive me crazy.I just got my S8 for last few days and it is pretty fast and smooth. I think one reason there are stutters sometimes is because Android can scroll much faster than IOS. So the loading of data needs to catch up with the scroll. If you scroll at the slow speed of Iphone then it will be buttery smooth. Personally, I rather have the fast scroll with occasional stutters than Iphone slow buttery scroll.
Yes I also noticed this on the iPhone. At first I thought it was broken lol, then I looked up why scrolling is so slow and it seems that's the iPhone way. It would drive me crazy.
I much prefer Android's scrolling - I scroll very fast, and my phone does it generally very smoothly. It can stutter a bit when loading stuff on the fly, but then again, in these scenarios my iPad stutters a lot more and crashes its browser window quite frequently, so I think iOS has no lessons whatsoever to teach in respect to scrolling, being rubbish at it and giving the fake perception of smoothness simply by artificially limiting scroll rates.
I much prefer Android's scrolling - I scroll very fast, and my phone does it generally very smoothly. It can stutter a bit when loading stuff on the fly, but then again, in these scenarios my iPad stutters a lot more and crashes its browser window quite frequently, so I think iOS has no lessons whatsoever to teach in respect to scrolling, being rubbish at it and giving the fake perception of smoothness simply by artificially limiting scroll rates.
Apparently Apple is changing their scrolling for iOS 11. It should be faster inertia scrolling like the rest of their apps. Only Safari scrolls like this.
Android phones need 6-8GB RAM? Why?
I think 4GB is enough if the software is close to "stock" Android. Samsung phones typically need tons of RAM because they have so many useless services running in the background.
Yeah, totally. /s
None need it, but some benefit from it because they're trying to do so much. Samsung phones typically have tons of extra services running and they eat up RAM. As Android O introduces picture in picture to all phones, I imagine having more RAM will be nice. But more RAM does need power to run, and so I do wish these companies would balance things a bit better.
Chrome on Android isn't a drain. It's on desktops that it gets crappy.