... It's an Apple Cinema Display.NWAMacTech said:
If PM (for PowerMac), PB (for PowerBook), iB (for iBook), and a handful of other acronyms (FCP, etc) are acceptable ... why not ACD?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Annoying MR community typos
- Thread starter Peyton
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
- Status
If PM (for PowerMac), PB (for PowerBook), iB (for iBook), and a handful of other acronyms (FCP, etc) are acceptable ... why not ACD?
I, on the other hand, love these threads. Why? Because without fail, the person posting about how people should be more grammatically correct in their responses makes their own errors in the initial post.SamIchi said:
For anyone tempted to start another one of these threads - by all means, please do it. And even better, split a few infinitives while you're at it.
Well this is by far my most popular post to date, and as everyone has pointed out, I made mistakes of my own. Too bad I'm not being graded or getting paid for this, I might actually care more.
As for its and it's...
It's shows possession such as
"I have a dog and it's back leg is broken"
Its - a combo of it and is
"Its a nice day outside"
Now PLEASE correct me if I'm wrong!
As for its and it's...
It's shows possession such as
"I have a dog and it's back leg is broken"
Its - a combo of it and is
"Its a nice day outside"
Now PLEASE correct me if I'm wrong!
I would like to correctly answer that question, but to really find the root of the issue, I think you need to go beyond my scope of understanding.Mr Skills said:
My guess - I believe the "infinitive" of a verb in many languages is one word. For example, "etre" in French meaning "to be". Therefore, if you split an infinitive in English, you are splitting a single word, in essence. That would be un-*******-forgivable.
Mr Skills said:
The rule against splitting an infinitive in English seems to date back to the 19th century when there was a feeling that Greek and Latin were more pure languages than English (not surprisingly since English is a hodge podge of Greek, Latin, Saxon, Angle, Nordic, French, German etc). Since you can't split an infinitive in Latin, it was felt that you shouldn't be able to do it in formal English either. IIRC, it can be traced back to a single textbook on the English language by someone who felt strongly about the issue.
My only feeling on splitting infinitives with adverbs is where it might make the meaning ambiguous. Occasionally whether the adverb is before or after the verb can affect the meaning of the sentence since the subject for the adverb can vary. If you split the verb with the infinitive, then it might not be so clear.
Peyton - you're kidding, right?
You're wrong. You are officially asked to STOP trying to be the Grammar and Spelling Police, as you're clearly unqualified for the job.Peyton said:
Maybe it is too hard for non-English speaker to post. That would make them become paranoid of making mistake of their grammar.
Peyton said:
Okay, since you said please, you're WRONG. You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. You just successfully proved to everyone here, yet again, that you have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to grammar and spelling. Majoring in English? Better study up, because right now you're failing.
And you make the effort to create a thread to criticze other people's grammar? Pot, meet kettle.
clayj said:
And like all those threads about official posts, I'm glad an official has asked me to stop
I really don't take this as seriously as it might have seemed. Hindsight is 20/20, I wouldn't have opened this can of worms if I could go back. I am soo sorry, you don't even know, please forgive me.
And seriously, I didn't mean to annoy anyone
~Shard~ said:Okay, since you said please, you're WRONG. You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. You just successfully proved to everyone here, yet again, that you have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to grammar and spelling. Majoring in English? Better study up, because right now you're failing.
And you make the effort to create a thread to criticze other people's grammar? Pot, meet kettle.
Yikes, I should have added a
after the end of that, I was joking!
Peyton said:Yikes, I should have added a
Yes, that would have been proper use of "Internet grammar" in that instance.
You should of known that you would be digested coming here trying to "kick knowledge" to MR.
digested and ready to pass through..
Bless
digested and ready to pass through..
Bless
Doesn't a thread like this pop up every two or three months or so?
Its getting annoying to see this over and over and over again.
Its getting annoying to see this over and over and over again.
Don't worry, if someone makes a typo, someone will point it out.
Im seriously considering changing my signature back to Im not a psycho! I just play one on these forms....
Just to see how many people will "correct" me.
I say: Unless you can't actually understand what people are saying, there's no harm done.
Nouw, letes guo on ower meary waghs.
Im seriously considering changing my signature back to Im not a psycho!
I just play one on these forms....Just to see how many people will "correct" me.
I say: Unless you can't actually understand what people are saying, there's no harm done.
Nouw, letes guo on ower meary waghs.
Think we've all had enough of this. No one is going to change anything here. If my or anyone elses speeling
bugs you, hard luck.- Status