Current Equipment:
I'm looking for something for shooting mostly wildlife and kids.
Examples:
Other important factors:
I'm not a professional and don't expect to ever get paid for my photos unless I stumble across Bigfoot while on a hike.
The nikon 70-200 2.8 or any other PRO Nikon lens is out of the question with the exception of maybe a used 80-200 2.8 based on what I can afford.
This all brings me to my initial conclusion that it's between the Nikon 70-300 VR 4.5-5.6 and the Sigma 70-200 2.8 HSM II Macro (non-OS version). Obviously the big differences between the two are:
For my intended use, I'd like to know from anyone who has an opinion (especially if you have one or both lenses or do a lot of the types of shooting I mention above) on which one makes the most sense.
Thanks.
- Nikon D90
- Tokina 12-24mm AT-X 124 AF PRO DX
- Nikon 15-105mm VR Kit lens
- Nikon 50mm 1.8 D AF
I'm looking for something for shooting mostly wildlife and kids.
Examples:
- Deer
- Elk
- Animals at the zoo
- The occasional bird in a tree/nest
- Not a lion or grizzly bear at 1000m
- Kids at karate practice (indoors)
- Kids playing football (outdoors - daylight)
- Maybe some street photography where I can maintain some distance
Other important factors:
I'm not a professional and don't expect to ever get paid for my photos unless I stumble across Bigfoot while on a hike.
The nikon 70-200 2.8 or any other PRO Nikon lens is out of the question with the exception of maybe a used 80-200 2.8 based on what I can afford.
This all brings me to my initial conclusion that it's between the Nikon 70-300 VR 4.5-5.6 and the Sigma 70-200 2.8 HSM II Macro (non-OS version). Obviously the big differences between the two are:
- Weight (the Sigma is much heaver)
- Low light capability (2.8 on the Sigma)
- Range (an extra 100mm on the Nikon. However, I can address this with a teleconverter for the Sigma down the road).
- Price (probably $300 more for the Sigma).
For my intended use, I'd like to know from anyone who has an opinion (especially if you have one or both lenses or do a lot of the types of shooting I mention above) on which one makes the most sense.
Thanks.